Snapdragon 888 vs Kirin 990 (5G)

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 (with Adreno 660 graphics) and HiSilicon Kirin 990 (5G) (Mali-G76 MP16). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
  • Performs 2.8x better in floating-point computations
  • Supports 50% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 34.1 GB/s)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 7 nm)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~40%)
  • Shows better (up to 28%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1135K vs 887K
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1135878
CPU 406119 370957
GPU 233383 142673
Memory 188085 172126
UX 308291 202120
Total score 1135878 887876
Samples [127 tests] [7 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 156.9 MB/sec 146.4 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 86.4 pages/sec 82.7 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 104.6 Mpixels/sec 114.4 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 72.9 images/sec 68.9 images/sec
HDR 104.7 Mpixels/sec 100.5 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 12.1 images/sec 12.1 images/sec
Photo processing 26.5 images/sec 34.5 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.04 Mpixels/sec 4.44 Mpixels/sec
Samples 49 tests 5 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 7.75 images/sec 7.73 images/sec
Face detection 3.37 images/sec 4.68 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.22 Gpixels/sec 0.12 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.28 Gpixels/sec 0.42 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.32 Gpixels/sec 0.26 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.03 Gpixels/sec 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 13.1 Gpixels/sec 16.1 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 851.2 FPS 628.3 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 19 tests -

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 505 -
Stability 77% -
Graphics test 4 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 1508 -
Stability 91% -
Graphics test 9 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 12232 -
Video editing score 7638 -
Data manipulation score 10494 -
Photo editing score 29866 -
Writing score 15219 -
Phones tested 11 models -

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 83 FPS
[Ultra]
58 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Ultra]
44 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite 26 FPS
[Ultra]
30 FPS
[High]
Shadowgun Legends 89 FPS
[Ultra]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 112 FPS
[Ultra]
60 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact 58 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 60 FPS
[Ultra]
59 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Asus Zenfone 8
1080 x 2400
Huawei Honor 30 Pro Plus
1200 x 2640
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-02 -> NotezitGeekBench CPU1412 / 3348
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-18 (Soul)AnTuTu1210861
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-14 (Marchi1962)GeekBench CPU1537 / 3989
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-14 (Marchi1962)AnTuTu1253342
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-08 -> AlicanTuTuAnTuTu1198886
HiSilicon Kirin 990 (5G)
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-17 (Nikotik)AnTuTu891785
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-17 (Demon_007)CPU Throttle90%
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-17 (Demon_007)AnTuTu823339
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-24 (Maestro)AnTuTu827011
πŸ“˜ 2025-09-30 (AMK)GeekBench CPU1018 / 3387

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 888 and Kirin 990 (5G)

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.84 GHz – Kryo 680 Prime (Cortex-X1)
3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55)
2x 2.86 GHz – Cortex-A76
2x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2840 MHz 2860 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.4-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache 512 KB 512 KB
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L3 cache 4 MB -
Process 5 nanometers 7 nanometers
Transistor count 10.3 billion 8 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 8 W 6 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 660 Mali-G76 MP16
Architecture Adreno 600 Bifrost 3rd gen
GPU frequency 840 MHz 600 MHz
Pipelines 3 16
Shading units 256 24
Total shaders 768 384
FLOPS 1290.2 Gigaflops 460.8 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 780 Da Vinci

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gb/s 34.1 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3360 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP -
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VC-1
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem X60 Balong 5000
4G support LTE Cat. 22 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7500 Mbps Up to 4600 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3000 Mbps -
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou

Info

Announced December 2020 October 2019
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number SM8350 -
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 official site HiSilicon Kirin 990 (5G) official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 - HiSilicon Kirin 9000S

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
232 (50.8%)
225 (49.2%)
Total votes: 457

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 990 (5G) and Snapdragon 888, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!