Unisoc T9100 vs Dimensity 8050
We compared two 8-core processors: Unisoc T9100 (with Mali-G57 MP4 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 8050 (Mali-G77 MP9). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8050
- Performs 2.6x better in floating-point computations
- Supports 100% higher memory bandwidth (34.1 against 17.07 GB/s)
- Shows significantly better (up to 42%) AnTuTu 11 score β 1029K vs 723K
- 11% higher CPU clock speed (3000 vs 2700 MHz)
- Higher GPU frequency (~14%)
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksAnTuTu 11
| CPU | 292879 | 378209 |
| GPU | 61687 | 135451 |
| Memory | 147055 | 206995 |
| UX | 222204 | 308829 |
| Total score | 723825 | 1029484 |
| Samples | [11 tests] | [21 tests] |
GeekBench 6
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
| Asset compression | 134.1 MB/sec | 163.8 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 51.9 pages/sec | 96.3 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 85.6 Mpixels/sec | 128.8 Mpixels/sec |
| Image detection | 41.7 images/sec | 69.7 images/sec |
| HDR | 75.1 Mpixels/sec | 117.2 Mpixels/sec |
| Background blur | 8.19 images/sec | 9.86 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 20.3 images/sec | 33.4 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 4.09 Mpixels/sec | 4.59 Mpixels/sec |
| Samples | Less than 3 | 15 tests |
Compute Score (GPU)
| Background blur | 4.54 images/sec | 7.18 images/sec |
| Face detection | 1.97 images/sec | 3.68 images/sec |
| Horizon detection | 0.1 Gpixels/sec | 0.22 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge detection | 0.15 Gpixels/sec | 0.37 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian blur | 0.13 Gpixels/sec | 0.23 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature matching | 0.04 Gpixels/sec | 0.06 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo matching | 10.4 Gpixels/sec | 14.3 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle physics | 398.1 FPS | 764.6 FPS |
| API | OpenCL | Vulkan |
| Samples | 2 tests | 12 tests |
3DMark
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Score | 233 | 445 |
| Stability | 97% | - |
| Graphics test | 2 FPS | 3 FPS |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Score | - | 1300 |
| Graphics test | - | 7 FPS |
PCMark 3.0
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 14936 | 11867 |
| Video editing score | 7599 | 6512 |
| Data manipulation score | 9940 | 9539 |
| Photo editing score | 32237 | 41710 |
| Writing score | 15432 | 21233 |
| Phones tested | Less than 3 | 4 models |
Recent User Tests
Unisoc T9100
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-13 (Vinnzzx67) | AnTuTu 12 | 821056 |
| π 2026-09-12 -> Chizu | AnTuTu 11 | 746898 |
| π 2026-06-22 (Firdausss) | AnTuTu 11 | 754254 |
| π 2026-05-04 -> Gil_lipata33 | AnTuTu 11 | 723825 |
| π 2026-05-04 (Zypher) | AnTuTu 11 | 723825 |
MediaTek Dimensity 8050
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-08-02 (Saint) | AnTuTu 11 | 1041022 |
| π 2026-04-01 (Javohir) | AnTuTu 11 | 1038280 |
| π 2026-03-21 (xmalle) | AnTuTu 11 | 1033346 |
| π 2026-03-19 (Ivan) | AnTuTu 11 | 937684 |
| π 2026-03-08 (ParimKnight) | AnTuTu 11 | 999486 |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Unisoc T9100 and Dimensity 8050CPU
| Architecture | 1x 2.7 GHz β Cortex-A76 3x 2.3 GHz β Cortex-A76 4x 2.1 GHz β Cortex-A55 |
1x 3 GHz β Cortex-A78 3x 2.6 GHz β Cortex-A78 4x 2 GHz β Cortex-A55 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2700 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Process | 6 nanometers | 6 nanometers |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP4 | Mali-G77 MP9 |
| Architecture | Valhall 1st gen | Valhall 1st gen |
| GPU frequency | 780 MHz | 886 MHz |
| Pipelines | 4 | 9 |
| Shading units | 32 | 32 |
| Total shaders | 128 | 288 |
| FLOPS | 199.7 Gigaflops | 510.3 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
AI Accelerator
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | MediaTek APU 570 |
| NPU theoretical performance | 8 TOPS | - |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 17.07 Gb/s | 34.1 Gb/s |
| Max size | 32 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Max display resolution | 3440 x 1440 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 200MP |
| Video capture | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 18 | LTE Cat. 21 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | - | Up to 4700 Mbps |
| Upload speed | - | Up to 2500 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
Info
| Announced | March 2025 | May 2023 |
| Class | Mid range | Mid range |
| Model number | - | MT6893, MT6893Z_T/CZA |
| Official page | Unisoc T9100 official site | MediaTek Dimensity 8050 official site |
Further details
Notes on Unisoc T9100:
- It's just rebranded Unisoc T820 chip.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 43
Related Comparisons
6.
Unisoc T9100 vs Unisoc T820 (5)