Tiger T616 vs Snapdragon 680

We compared two 8-core processors: Unisoc Tiger T616 (with Mali-G57 MP1 graphics) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (Adreno 610). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
  • Performs 5.9x better in floating-point computations
  • Has a smaller size transistor (6 versus 12 nm)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~49%)
  • 20% higher CPU clock speed (2400 vs 2000 MHz)
  • Shows better (up to 9%) AnTuTu 11 score – 424K vs 390K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
390317
424216
CPU 158155 185604
GPU 17920 26544
Memory 120251 114814
UX 93991 97254
Total score 390317 424216
Samples [6 tests] [82 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Tiger T616 +10%
452
Multi-Core Score
1490
Asset compression 73.1 MB/sec 85.7 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 45.9 pages/sec 43.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 52.5 Mpixels/sec 59.4 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 23.8 images/sec 15.7 images/sec
HDR 43.2 Mpixels/sec 49.8 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 3.11 images/sec 2.98 images/sec
Photo processing 14.2 images/sec 11.3 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.16 Mpixels/sec 2.59 Mpixels/sec
Samples 7 tests 35 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Tiger T616 +47%
512
Background blur 0.81 images/sec 0.32 images/sec
Face detection 0.42 images/sec 0.16 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.03 Gpixels/sec 0.03 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.04 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.01 Gpixels/sec 0.01 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 1.39 Gpixels/sec 1.48 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 79 FPS 26.6 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples 4 tests 20 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 54 -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 172
Stability - 97%
Graphics test - 1 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
8112
Web score 8248 7531
Video editing score 4823 4072
Data manipulation score 5662 6097
Photo editing score 16913 14785
Writing score 9412 8535
Phones tested 2 models 16 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 59 FPS
[Medium]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 60 FPS
[Low]
Fortnite - 23 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends - 65 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz - 62 FPS
[Medium]
Genshin Impact - 26 FPS
[Low]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 54 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Unisoc Tiger T616
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-24 (Sealme C35)AnTuTu 11402854
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-15 (Jerry)AnTuTu 11390317
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-14 (Jerry)Geekbench 6 GPU510
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-14 (Jerry)Geekbench 6 CPU452 / 1511
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-23 (Explosivo)AnTuTu 11370494
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 (Croze)AnTuTu 12490622
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Arsts)AnTuTu 12516449
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 -> Oleg 16 cmAnTuTu 11426265
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-16 (ZION)AnTuTu 12514393
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-15 (Raick)AnTuTu 12486423

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Tiger T616 and Snapdragon 680

CPU

Architecture 2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75
6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
4x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2000 MHz 2400 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
Process 12 nanometers 6 nanometers
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G57 MP1 Adreno 610
Architecture Valhall 1st gen Adreno 600
GPU frequency 750 MHz 1114 MHz
Pipelines 1 1
Shading units 32 128
Total shaders 32 128
FLOPS 48 Gigaflops 285.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version - 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) No Hexagon 686

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 1866 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth - 17 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.0, UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2400 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 1K at 60FPS 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem - X11
4G support LTE Cat. 7 LTE Cat. 13
5G support No No
Download speed Up to 300 Mbps Up to 390 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.0 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced January 2021 October 2021
Class Low end Low end
Model number - SM6225
Official page Unisoc Tiger T616 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
285 (20.4%)
1111 (79.6%)
Total votes: 1396

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 680 and Tiger T616, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
No comparison November 16, 2024 at 06:00 PM
While it seems that the performance is quite similar, CPU wise. The GPU in unisoc is shockingly weak. It struggles in basic basic games. This is based on my experience with the moto g14. I couldn't understand how this processor could be used in any smartphone. What if games isn't your thing at all. Then keep running away as well. Endless connection problems. Bluetooth not working most of the time, Wifi speed being extremely low, hotspot not working at all, Lag while just scrolling and doing basic tasks. I thought this processor matched the helio g85. I was never more wrong. I believe this will continue to be true even if you choose a different phone. Realme , Itel, and many more use these chipsets. Avoide them completely.
0 Reply
Avatar
Choco September 27, 2024 at 10:57 AM
Unisoc, though a budget player, lacks far behind on battery optimization.
+8 Reply