Xring O3 vs M5 (iPad)

We compared two 10-core processors: Xiaomi Xring O3 (with Mali-G2 Ultra NX MP16 graphics) and Apple M5 (iPad) (Apple M5 GPU). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Xiaomi Xring O3
  • Performs 58% better in floating-point computations
  • Shows significantly better (up to 54%) AnTuTu 11 score – 5228K vs 3396K
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of Apple M5 (iPad)
  • Supports 34% higher memory bandwidth (153 against 113.8 GB/s)
  • 6% higher CPU clock speed (4610 vs 4350 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Xring O3 +54%
5228014
3396957
CPU 1359147 965229
GPU 2143582 1313129
Memory 941063 458312
UX 784222 660296
Total score 5228014 3396957
Samples Less than 3 [3 tests]
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores.

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
3715
M5 (iPad) +13%
4193
Multi-Core Score
14213
M5 (iPad) +12%
15913
Asset compression - 576.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser - 374.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer - 380 Mpixels/sec
Image detection - 452.7 images/sec
HDR - 549.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur - 55 images/sec
Photo processing - 161.4 images/sec
Ray tracing - 18.3 Mpixels/sec
Samples - 4 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
36901
M5 (iPad) +106%
76009
Background blur - 153 images/sec
Face detection - 177.6 images/sec
Horizon detection - 2.22 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection - 2.84 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur - 5.76 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching - 0.95 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching - 188 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics - 6580.5 FPS
API - Metal
Samples - 4 tests
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Xring O3 +15%
4700
4104
Score 4700 4104
Stability - 71%
Graphics test - 30 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
n/a
17310
Score - 17310
Graphics test - 66 FPS
Section 1 - 88 FPS
Section 2 - 63 FPS
Section 3 - 46 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
11474
n/a
Score 11474 -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Xring O3
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 -> manvanconggggAnTuTu 124862080
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 (KarlderaL)AnTuTu 125558210
Apple M5 (iPad)
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-06 (Ty)AnTuTu 113824321
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-09 (patrick)AnTuTu 113511739
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-12 (LBWNB)AnTuTu 113396957
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-17 -> LiberoGeekbench 6 GPU76909
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-17 -> LiberoGeekbench 6 CPU4193 / 15913

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Xring O3 and M5 (iPad)

CPU

Architecture 2x 4.35 GHz – C1-Ultra
4x 3.68 GHz – C1-Premium
4x 3.15 GHz – C1-Pro
4x 4.61 GHz –
6x 2.95 GHz –
Cores 10 10
Frequency 4350 MHz 4610 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.3-A ARMv9.2-A
L1 cache - 192 KB
L2 cache 12 MB 16 MB
L3 cache 16 MB -
Process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Transistor count 24 billion -
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G2 Ultra NX MP16 Apple M5 GPU
Architecture Valhall 6th gen Apple GPU
GPU frequency 1600 MHz 1620 MHz
Pipelines 16 10
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 2048 1280
FLOPS 6554 Gigaflops 4147.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.4 -
OpenCL version 3.0 -
DirectX version 12.2 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Apple Neural Engine
NPU theoretical performance 200 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR6 LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 5333 MHz 4800 MHz
Bus 4x 24 Bit 8x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 113.8 Gb/s 153 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.1 NVMe
Max display resolution - 2752 x 2064
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem - C1X
4G support - LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Wi-Fi 7 7
Bluetooth 6.0 6.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Info

Announced August 2026 October 2025
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number - T8142

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
84 (71.2%)
34 (28.8%)
Total votes: 118

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of M5 (iPad) and Xring O3, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Deathcall666 September 9, 2026 at 07:30 AM
Tight fight, but in sure there are use case scenarios where apple is better
+1 Reply
Avatar
James October 21, 2026 at 02:38 PM
I agree M is computer chip is powerfully
0 Reply