Xring O3 vs M4 (iPad)

We compared two 10-core processors: Xiaomi Xring O3 (with Mali-G2 Ultra NX MP16 graphics) and Apple M4 (iPad) (). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Xiaomi Xring O3
  • Performs 74% better in floating-point computations
  • Shows significantly better (up to 68%) AnTuTu 11 score – 5228K vs 3116K
  • Higher GPU frequency (~9%)
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of Apple M4 (iPad)
  • Supports 5% higher memory bandwidth (120 against 113.8 GB/s)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Xring O3 +68%
5228014
3116013
CPU 1359147 915032
GPU 2143582 1135331
Memory 941063 349968
UX 784222 715682
Total score 5228014 3116013
Samples Less than 3 [3 tests]
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores.

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Xring O3 +1%
3715
3683
Multi-Core Score
Xring O3 +6%
14213
13402
Asset compression - 501.5 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser - 305.6 pages/sec
PDF Renderer - 317.1 Mpixels/sec
Image detection - 416.7 images/sec
HDR - 461.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur - 54.3 images/sec
Photo processing - 139.8 images/sec
Ray tracing - 14.9 Mpixels/sec
Samples - 7 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
36901
M4 (iPad) +46%
53792
Background blur - 103 images/sec
Face detection - 124.8 images/sec
Horizon detection - 1.7 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection - 2.32 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur - 2.8 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching - 0.73 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching - 164.7 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics - 4657.1 FPS
API - Metal
Samples - 6 tests
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Xring O3 +35%
4700
3477
Score 4700 3477
Stability - 71%
Graphics test - 26 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
n/a
14286
Score - 14286
Graphics test - 54 FPS
Section 1 - 63 FPS
Section 2 - 56 FPS
Section 3 - 43 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
11474
n/a
Score 11474 -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Xring O3
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 -> manvanconggggAnTuTu 124862080
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 (KarlderaL)AnTuTu 125558210
Apple M4 (iPad)
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-07 (Lexapes)Geekbench 6 GPU57080
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-07 (Lexapes)Geekbench 6 CPU3907 / 15397
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-07 (Lexapes)AnTuTu 113396741
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-03 (Astreeek)AnTuTu 112940000
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-26 (BG-M4-User)Geekbench 6 GPU52952

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Xring O3 and M4 (iPad)

CPU

Architecture 2x 4.35 GHz – C1-Ultra
4x 3.68 GHz – C1-Premium
4x 3.15 GHz – C1-Pro
4x 4.41 GHz –
6x 2.85 GHz –
Cores 10 10
Frequency 4350 MHz 4410 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.3-A ARMv9.2-A
L1 cache - 192 KB
L2 cache 12 MB 16 MB
L3 cache 16 MB -
Process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Transistor count 24 billion 28 billion
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G2 Ultra NX MP16 -
Architecture Valhall 6th gen -
GPU frequency 1600 MHz 1470 MHz
Pipelines 16 -
Shading units 128 -
Total shaders 2048 -
FLOPS 6554 Gigaflops 3763.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.4 -
OpenCL version 3.0 -
DirectX version 12.2 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Apple Neural Engine
NPU theoretical performance 200 TOPS 38 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR6 LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 5333 MHz 7500 MHz
Bus 4x 24 Bit 8x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 113.8 Gb/s 120 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.1 NVMe
Max display resolution - 2752 x 2064
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem - Snapdragon X71
4G support - LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed - Up to 10000 Mbps
Upload speed - Up to 3500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 6
Bluetooth 6.0 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Info

Announced August 2026 May 2024
Class Flagship Flagship
Further details
Notes on M4 (iPad):
    - There is slightly slower (5-7%) version of M4 that uses 3 performance + 6 efficiency cores array in 256GB/512GB models of iPad Pro.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
57 (89.1%)
7 (10.9%)
Total votes: 64

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of M4 (iPad) and Xring O3, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
J11 September 1, 2026 at 11:47 PM
Damn, Xring O3 on the next Xiaomi Pad lineup will literally be a beast πŸ’€ Android has officially rival the Apple in terms of Tablet category.
+2 Reply
Avatar
Garrett August 25, 2026 at 12:44 PM
They have the Xring listed as 4x 16 bit bus. I could be wrong, but I think it 4x 24 bit
+2 Reply
Avatar
Garrett August 26, 2026 at 05:31 PM
Edit: they fixed it!
0 Reply
Serhii August 27, 2026 at 07:31 AM
Garrett, Appreciate your comments.
0 Reply