Xring O3 vs Exynos 2600
We compared two 10-core processors: Xiaomi Xring O3 (with Mali-G2 Ultra NX MP16 graphics) and Samsung Exynos 2600 (Samsung Xclipse 960). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of Xiaomi Xring O3
- Shows significantly better (up to 65%) AnTuTu 11 score β 5228K vs 3161K
- Higher GPU frequency (~63%)
- Supports 33% higher memory bandwidth (113.8 against 85.3 GB/s)
- 14% higher CPU clock speed (4350 vs 3800 MHz)
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2600
- Has a smaller size transistor (2 versus 3 nm)
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksAnTuTu 11
| CPU | 1359147 | 1023425 |
| GPU | 2143582 | 1236436 |
| Memory | 941063 | 384525 |
| UX | 784222 | 516740 |
| Total score | 5228014 | 3161126 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | [20 tests] |
GeekBench 6
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
| Asset compression | - | 459.4 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | - | 328.1 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | - | 345 Mpixels/sec |
| Image detection | - | 259.1 images/sec |
| HDR | - | 344.2 Mpixels/sec |
| Background blur | - | 41.7 images/sec |
| Photo processing | - | 97.1 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | - | 12.2 Mpixels/sec |
| Samples | - | 8 tests |
Compute Score (GPU)
| Background blur | - | 43.4 images/sec |
| Face detection | - | 20.2 images/sec |
| Horizon detection | - | 1.03 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge detection | - | 1.41 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian blur | - | 2.05 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature matching | - | 0.28 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo matching | - | 95 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle physics | - | 4524 FPS |
| API | - | Vulkan |
| Samples | - | 7 tests |
3DMark
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Score | 4700 | 3109 |
| Graphics test | - | 23 FPS |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Score | - | 11935 |
| Graphics test | - | 45 FPS |
| Section 1 | - | 51 FPS |
| Section 2 | - | 44 FPS |
| Section 3 | - | 39 FPS |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Score | 11474 | - |
PCMark 3.0
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | - | 21279 |
| Video editing score | - | 8171 |
| Data manipulation score | - | 16909 |
| Photo editing score | - | 40764 |
| Writing score | - | 30248 |
| Phones tested | - | Less than 3 |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Xring O3
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-23 -> manvancongggg | AnTuTu 12 | 4862080 |
| π 2026-09-08 (KarlderaL) | AnTuTu 12 | 5558210 |
Samsung Exynos 2600
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-30 -> Serost | AnTuTu 12 | 3359689 |
| π 2026-09-26 (gollim) | AnTuTu 12 | 3269772 |
| π 2026-09-24 (Pires) | AnTuTu 12 | 3302245 |
| π 2026-09-20 (Shaco) | AnTuTu 12 | 3216468 |
| π 2026-09-06 (Artem) | AnTuTu 11 | 3113554 |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Xring O3 and Exynos 2600CPU
| Architecture | 2x 4.35 GHz β C1-Ultra 4x 3.68 GHz β C1-Premium 4x 3.15 GHz β C1-Pro |
1x 3.8 GHz β C1-Ultra 3x 3.25 GHz β C1-Pro 6x 2.75 GHz β C1-Pro |
| Cores | 10 | 10 |
| Frequency | 4350 MHz | 3800 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv9.3-A | ARMv9.3-A |
| L1 cache | - | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 12 MB | 3 MB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 16 MB |
| Process | 3 nanometers | 2 nanometers |
| Transistor count | 24 billion | - |
| TDP (Sustained Power Limit) | - | 8 W |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | Samsung |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G2 Ultra NX MP16 | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
| Architecture | Valhall 6th gen | RDNA 4 |
| GPU frequency | 1600 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Pipelines | 16 | 8 |
| Shading units | 128 | 448 |
| Total shaders | 2048 | 1792 |
| FLOPS | 6554 Gigaflops | 7024.6 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenCL version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| DirectX version | 12.2 | 12.1 |
AI Accelerator
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | AI engine with 32K MAC NPU |
| NPU theoretical performance | 200 TOPS | 59 TOPS |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR6 | LPDDR5X |
| Memory frequency | 5333 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Bus | 4x 24 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 113.8 Gb/s | 85.3 Gb/s |
| Max size | 24 GB | 24 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Max display resolution | - | 3840 x 2160 |
| Max camera resolution | - | 1x 320MP |
| Video capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video playback | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 |
- AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 |
Connectivity
| Modem | - | Exynos 5410 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | - | Up to 14790 Mbps |
| Upload speed | - | Up to 4900 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 7 | 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
Info
| Announced | August 2026 | December 2025 |
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Model number | - | S5E9965 |
| Official page | - | Samsung Exynos 2600 official site |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 77