Xring O3 vs Dimensity 9500

We compared the 10-core Xiaomi Xring O3 (Mali-G2 Ultra NX MP16) with the older 8-core MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (Mali-G1 Ultra MP12) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Xiaomi Xring O3
  • Shows better (up to 39%) AnTuTu 11 score – 5228K vs 3760K
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Supports 33% higher memory bandwidth (113.8 against 85.3 GB/s)
  • Performs 24% better in floating-point computations
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9500
  • Higher GPU frequency (~7%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Xring O3 +39%
5228014
3760662
CPU 1359147 1048345
GPU 2143582 1432351
Memory 941063 476680
UX 784222 803286
Total score 5228014 3760662
Samples Less than 3 [119 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Xring O3 +11%
3715
Multi-Core Score
Xring O3 +37%
14213
Asset compression - 397.3 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser - 292.7 pages/sec
PDF Renderer - 328.1 Mpixels/sec
Image detection - 234.3 images/sec
HDR - 328.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur - 40.9 images/sec
Photo processing - 109.9 images/sec
Ray tracing - 10.3 Mpixels/sec
Samples - 29 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Xring O3 +45%
36901
Background blur - 47.2 images/sec
Face detection - 26.1 images/sec
Horizon detection - 0.78 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection - 1.31 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur - 1.68 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching - 0.31 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching - 91.9 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics - 3324.6 FPS
API - Vulkan
Samples - 14 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Xring O3 +51%
4700
Score 4700 3119
Stability - 57%
Graphics test - 23 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score - 13319
Graphics test - 51 FPS
Section 1 - 55 FPS
Section 2 - 52 FPS
Section 3 - 43 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 11474 -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 14375
Video editing score - 5995
Data manipulation score - 12159
Photo editing score - 34571
Writing score - 22695
Phones tested - 4 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Xring O3
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 -> manvanconggggAnTuTu 124862080
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 (KarlderaL)AnTuTu 125558210
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-04 (Elvin)AnTuTu 113330144
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-04 (SillyKilly)AnTuTu 123461876
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-03 (ISLAH AMINE)AnTuTu 123544347
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-03 (hi)AnTuTu 123485917
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-02 (weipoh09)AnTuTu 123319530

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Xring O3 and Dimensity 9500

CPU

Architecture 2x 4.35 GHz – C1-Ultra
4x 3.68 GHz – C1-Premium
4x 3.15 GHz – C1-Pro
1x 4.21 GHz – C1-Ultra
3x 3.5 GHz – C1-Premium
4x 2.7 GHz – C1-Pro
Cores 10 8
Frequency 4350 MHz 4210 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.3-A ARMv9.3-A
L1 cache - 192 KB
L2 cache 12 MB 2 MB
L3 cache 16 MB 16 MB
Process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Transistor count 24 billion -
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) - 9 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G2 Ultra NX MP16 Mali-G1 Ultra MP12
Architecture Valhall 6th gen Valhall 5th gen
GPU frequency 1600 MHz 1716 MHz
Pipelines 16 12
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 2048 1536
FLOPS 6554 Gigaflops 5271.5 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.4 1.4
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.2 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek NPU 990
NPU theoretical performance 200 TOPS 100 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR6 LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 5333 MHz 5333 MHz
Bus 4x 24 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 113.8 Gb/s 85.3 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1
Max camera resolution - 1x 320MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

4G support - LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed - Up to 10700 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 7
Bluetooth 6.0 6.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced August 2026 September 2025
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number - MT6993
Official page - MediaTek Dimensity 9500 official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
77 (87.5%)
11 (12.5%)
Total votes: 88

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 9500 and Xring O3, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Zeeshan August 26, 2026 at 03:36 PM
I have never seen that much improvement in cpu and gpu performance and efficiency in a single generation without upgrading to that much advanced process node, last time i saw these jumps were when we went from 16nm nodes to sub 10nm nodes
+3 Reply
Avatar
pavlecom September 5, 2026 at 02:15 PM
Good observation, and that shows an incredible power of good design of SoC. πŸ”₯
+1 Reply
Avatar
Abdul Quddus August 25, 2026 at 02:17 PM
I guess this is the best cpu performance ever made for photos πŸ˜‰
0 Reply
Avatar
Nulluser.arg September 1, 2026 at 10:20 PM
It is the best SoC, in performance for photos, games and battery life. Competing even with the Dimensity, and Snapdragon
+2 Reply
Samuel28 September 4, 2026 at 01:15 AM
Nulluser.arg, For dimensity 9500 i would say not the best if your hand cant capable of huge heats
0 Reply