Samsung Exynos 1580 – an 8-core chipset that was announced on October 24, 2024, and is manufactured using a 4-nanometer process technology. It has 1 core Cortex-A720 at 2900 MHz, 3 cores Cortex-A720 at 2600 MHz, and 4 cores Cortex-A520 at 1950 MHz.
Review
CPU Performance
47
Gaming Performance
25
Battery life
89
NanoReview Score
49
Compare Samsung Exynos 1580 with other SoCs
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarks
AnTuTu 11
The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Off-topic, but this just reminded me that Samsung actually never sold a laptop with an AMD chip. They're collaborating when it comes to Exynos GPU Architecture though. Also wonder if they can bring FSR4 on 1680 (successor of this chip) which will likely have RDNA 4. It'd be nice. But then Samsung and AMD would need to collaborate with game studios regarding the FSR4 implementation on which they likely won't bother with since FSR4 rollout isn't as wide as Nvidia's DLSS.
+9Reply
ZeroSeptember 2, 2025 at 05:12 PM
Nope, only might come with RDNA 3.5. Filtered scores implies that.
If it continues with the same evolution curve, probably the exynos 1680 will reach 1,1/1,2 million points in antutu, a 25% increase with the CPU reaching 340K/380K (15/20%), while the GPU will reach 300/350K (20/25%).
The single core score reaching between 1500/1600 (10/15%), the multicore score being between 4100/4300 (10/15%) respectively, probably the configuration will be the same as 1+3+4 or 1+4+3 (1 prime core Cortex-A725/A720 running at 3/2.95/2.9GHz, 3 or 4 Cortex-A725A/720 running at 2.6GHz and 4 or 3 Cortex-A525/A520 running at 2GHz).
I confess that lately I am more excited for the launch of Samsung's Intermediate processors than any other brand, I would still like to see Samsung launch an intermediate SoC in the 2+4+2 configuration (2 Prime Cortex-A725/720 cores running at 3.0/2.8GHz, 4 Cortex-A725/720 intermediate cores running at 2.6/2.4GHz and 2 Cortex-A525/A520 energy efficiency cores at 2.0GHz) or in a more powerful configuration of 2+6 (2 Prime Cortex X4 cores at 3.0/2.8Gz and 6 cores. Cortex-A725/720 running at 2.6/2.4GHz)
The Exynos 1680 should be on par with Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vanilla. While SD 7 Gen 5 might be on par with the Plus version.
And seeing a 2+4+2 configuration could be the next step. I don't be surprised if is Mediatek approach next year for their Dimensity 7500.
+3Reply
MrschMarch 13, 2025 at 09:56 AM
Curious if Exynos 1680 would use (1+4+3) config: A725+A725+A520. And 3 nm. I've heard Samsung is making progress with its' 3 nm, but also they're reevaluating their position as a manufacturer. Might be the last chips made by Samsung. Which isn't a good thing - TSMC already has a huge market share and Intel is still behind / considers quitting lithography. If this comes to pass, TSMC will become world's most valuable company of all time!
Confirmed. Uses (1+4+3) config: A725+A725+A520. Is on Geekbench.
+1Reply
MrschJanuary 19, 2026 at 11:57 AM
HijikataX, Nice. Yeah, saw ~ 4300 multi-core score on Geekbench, which is pretty good for a midrange SoC. With all the geopolitical turmoil going on nowadays, US brands may become very expensive. It's nice to have options.
+1Reply
NerooMarch 4, 2025 at 11:51 AM
So based on recent Antutu test, Exynos 1580 CPU can reach 300K which is pretty good, however the GPU score is 250K-270K. Its GPU is slightly stronger than SD 7 Gen 3 but still weaker than Exynos 2100 and SD 888 which is a bit disappointing really, I expect the GPU score to be also 300K.
+45Reply
PerOre15March 3, 2025 at 10:23 PM
So how can we edit this page ??? Because A56 did 936k on antutu benchmark and 6930 on geekbench vulkan !!
+30Reply
akp831February 28, 2025 at 01:22 PM
GPU: Xclipse 540
Based on RDNA 3
256 Shaders
16 TMUs/ROPs
4 RT Cores
1300 MHZ
Max Gflops: 1331.2 In FP32 (256 SU X (2 Add + 2 Multiply) X 1300 MHZ)
BTW, the (2 Add + 2 Multiply) is due to the RDNA 3 architecture having 2 shader microprocessors for each
Other GPUs usually only have one, this includes the Apple silicon GPUs, the Qualcomm Adreno GPUs, the IMG aka PowerVR GPUs, and the Arm-Mail GPUs.
+5Reply
CRJ1997March 8, 2025 at 01:22 PM
I am so curious about what is the GPU clock speed of Exynos 1580 & when i compared this soc to dimensity 8100 & 8200 it says that the GPU of exynos 1580 is better so i wonder if this is real that it has 1.3 or maybe 1.5 FP32 TFLOPS
+10Reply
Mmmmmm...March 21, 2025 at 12:38 AM
What's the source of the technical details you listed? GPU manufacturers don't release the technical details of their GPUs to the general public.
I hope the A56 could sustain performance with less heat. The early antutu score leak is immature maybe the GPU score is near to SD7G3 or even slightly higher. If samsung could make Exynos get 300K+ on GPU score only, this A56 would be the beast among smartphones.
+25Reply
MrschFebruary 8, 2025 at 05:44 AM
Can see a real winner here. Early tests show it's faster than 7s Gen 3, so... Yeah. Fairly happy with Samsung's midrange SoCs.
+17Reply
Zoom LensFebruary 10, 2025 at 02:14 PM
I don't think its a "real winner" by just simply faster than 7s gen 3. For upper midrange SoCs in 2025, the Antutu score should or must reach 1M+ Antutu score.
+4Reply
MrschFebruary 14, 2025 at 10:45 AM
Zoom Lens, Perhaps. But phones with 1M+ Antutu tend to cost > $ 400 where I live. The A55 can be bought for ~ $ 300, right now. Maybe a few months after the A56 launches, it might be found for a similar price. Besides, you can't really tell that much of a difference between mid-range and high-end SoCs these days. No point in spending more, unless you want to.
+8Reply
PixellFebruary 17, 2025 at 03:34 AM
Mrsch, Reminder that the Samsung A56 is prepared by Samsung to rival the iPhone SE and Google Pixel 9a, all of which will be released at the same time and have the same price range, around $400+. The SoCs in the iPhone SE and Pixel 9a have proven to reach 1.1M+ AnTuTu scores. If the Exynos 1580 fails to reach 1M+, then the A56 has already lost against its competitors.
+18Reply
PixieFebruary 24, 2025 at 11:42 PM
Pixell, It is absolutely not in the same price range. Iphone 16e in Europe costs around €700, much more than usa while the A5X series usually starts at €500 and you can find it even at less than 300€ by the summer, 4-5 months later.
+6Reply
Boy.February 27, 2025 at 12:37 AM
Pixell, It will not be meant to rival 16e or pixel 9a. S24 FE is meant to rival both of them. It has 1.5M+ on antutu, and overall better experience than iphone 16e and pixel 9a could give.
+11Reply
hhhMarch 29, 2025 at 05:34 AM
Pixell, FE series is their competitor.S25 FE will release with exynos 2500.
+3Reply
whatApril 28, 2025 at 05:10 PM
hhh, it will release with the same exynos 2400e
+1Reply
NahSeptember 4, 2025 at 02:09 PM
what, 2400 actually.......
+4Reply
dfdsDecember 31, 2024 at 08:20 AM
hellond warmer since it's on a much more optimized node, and these mid range designs of Samsung are more efficient.
+6 Reply
+30Reply
HijibijDecember 12, 2024 at 07:01 AM
Is Exynos 1580's gaming ok. I don't think it is. I think it should be 37, why it is 32. Can you explain ?
+20Reply
Someone out thereDecember 13, 2024 at 08:53 AM
I wonder? Though, no phone have been officially released yet using the Samsung Exynos 1580, but considering the success of The Exynos 1480, I think the 1580 should definitely have a GPU score of between 35-40
+6Reply
No telephoto yetJanuary 1, 2025 at 11:15 AM
Maybe bacause there are no phone released with Exynos 1580 yet? Exynos 1580 GPU use the same architecture as Exynos 2400 (RDNA 3) with 2 WGP instead of 6, and with Exynos 1480 gaming is already on par or slightly below SD 7 Gen 3, I'd expect 40+ gaming performance.
+8Reply
noncinqueJanuary 11, 2025 at 08:37 AM
No telephoto yet, I think the tab S10 FE will come out on this chipset.
+2Reply
AnonymousJanuary 16, 2025 at 12:58 PM
Someone out there, samsung a56 will come with it
+4Reply
Boy.December 2, 2024 at 11:19 AM
It seems like the GPU is weaker than the SD 7 Gen 3.
0Reply
Chirag.sryNovember 26, 2024 at 07:43 AM
What's the gpu Frequency??? Hrtz???
+8Reply
EfsdDecember 8, 2024 at 10:07 AM
Nobody knows until Samsung A56 released next year
+2Reply
ZeroDecember 9, 2024 at 04:06 PM
Efsd, Aparently the S10 FE tablet will have it.
+2Reply
TruthNovember 13, 2024 at 05:12 AM
This series and their phone are real examples of
opposite of vale for money .
+12Reply
KauçukDecember 17, 2024 at 04:17 PM
Bro thinks raw power is enough to render a phone superior
+9Reply
Someone out thereNovember 12, 2024 at 11:59 AM
I personally think the Antutu score for Exynos1580 could be higher, especially its GPU score points.
+12Reply
KauçukNovember 15, 2024 at 12:14 PM
Yea, I was expecting a total of at least 920K on antutu. There were spwculations of 1580 exceeding a million points
+13Reply
MediatekNovember 1, 2024 at 01:21 PM
4×256 or 4×128 for the gpu??
+15Reply
14501December 4, 2024 at 11:58 AM
I think 4x128 like exynos 2400 with xclips 940 6x128
+4Reply
¯\_(ツ)_/¯October 26, 2024 at 12:18 PM
My only concern is thermals. I hope they've fixed their boiling Chipsets.
+13Reply
SpeedsterNovember 7, 2024 at 10:04 AM
Mid-range Exynos chipsets have never had any issues with heat.
+18Reply
KauçukNovember 12, 2024 at 06:13 AM
Speedster, Excuse me? Both Exynos 1280 and 1380 had substantial thermal throttling issues which were almost fixed with 1480. I think 1580 is going to be better.
+13Reply
HičilkNovember 22, 2024 at 02:05 AM
Kauçuk, 70-80% stability for CPU and 99% for GPU, on both Exynos 1280 and 1380, check GSMArena or any throttling test...
Midrange and Low end Exynos never had any throttling issues
+6Reply
ZeroNovember 28, 2024 at 07:30 PM
Kauçuk, Indeed, Exynos 1480 shows promise and I do not want to see it abandoned. Samsung should use it for Global A36
+7Reply
KauçukNovember 30, 2024 at 02:10 PM
Hičilk, Both 1280 and 850 were total jokes for the price/performance and heat and its a very widely known fact. Why even bother glazing such bad chipsets? (You said their budget chips weren't thermal throttling)
Checked many throttling tests and both exynos 1280 and 1380 both were way hotter than their equelivents and was experiencing substantial lack of optimization while oppening apps (exynos 1380 vs dimensity 1080 is a classic example for this).
Youtube is filled to brim with proof over these exynosses gasping for air during heavy use while mediatek/snapdragon counter parts not strugling much (even 1480 is a bit warmer than snapdragon 7s gen 3 but the diffirence is insignicifant)
+2Reply
KauçukNovember 30, 2024 at 02:12 PM
Zero, Yea but they have opted for 7 gen 1 it seems which is manufactured by Samsungs litography. This chipset did heat back in the day but Snapdragon 720G (another samsung manufactured chip) was never as hot as exynos 1280 so we can expect to be a middle of the road thermals from it. (There was even some speculations of them using 7s Gen 3 but it is too good to be true due to the price and how new the chip is)
+1Reply
TruthNovember 30, 2024 at 06:06 PM
Kauçuk, I agree with you , i have a21s , and it's the worst processor , in rs 15000 i have ever seen .
0Reply
Desolate IntentionDecember 1, 2024 at 05:01 PM
Hičilk, From my testing with the A54 it has 63% stability in Genshin under room temperature of 22 °C.
The CPU or GPU stability tests are never accurate to the actual usage because they only max out a single component, which is very unrealistic and not representative of any form of possible usage.
Today my A54 throtted significantly by multitasking Instagram, Reddit, and Discord. Room temperature was unknown but couldn't have been above 25 °C. The battery hit 38 °C and the SoC hit 80 °C.
The 1380 has SIGNIFICANT throttling issues.
+2Reply
ZeroDecember 10, 2024 at 09:41 PM
Desolate Intention, Funny story my friend have an A35, same processor and even in Genshin has better heat management. We concluded that maybe the cooling in the newer gens are better than older ones.
+2Reply
MrschDecember 28, 2024 at 11:49 PM
Kauçuk, 1280 and 1380 used inferior 5LPE litography. 1480 and 1580 are using 4LPP.
+3Reply
Desolate IntentionFebruary 8, 2025 at 01:35 PM
Zero, The vapor chamber is about 2x bigger on the A35, so that's correct.
0Reply
WillMathOctober 24, 2024 at 10:36 PM
Is this Antutu score right? There's no Galaxy phone with It.
+11Reply
DuyDangOctober 25, 2024 at 02:33 PM
Easy to guess! Of course, it's the Samsung Galaxy A56
A53: exynos 1280
A54: exynos 1380
A55: exynos 1480
A56: exynos 1580
+74Reply
EfsdOctober 26, 2024 at 12:28 PM
DuyDang, I'm sure what he means is currently there is no phone with exynos 1580, so the aforementioned Antutu score is questionable. Samsung A56 will be released next year
+12Reply
ZeroOctober 24, 2024 at 08:33 PM
Compared to Snapdragon 888 and the 888 wins GPU wise, but let's see how the optimizations can close the gap. If they pulls it, is a win for Samsung.
+5Reply
IhwaOctober 28, 2024 at 04:40 PM
Yeah but this is surely guaranteed to not be a living hand warmer since it's on a much more optimized node, and these mid range designs of Samsung are more efficient.
