Exynos 1580 vs Snapdragon 7s Gen 3

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 1580 (with Samsung Xclipse 540 graphics) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (Adreno 810). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 1580
  • Performs 2.5x better in floating-point computations
  • 16% higher CPU clock speed (2900 vs 2500 MHz)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~24%)
  • Shows better (up to 20%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1251K vs 1041K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1251512
CPU 490457 405718
GPU 296896 179932
Memory 173263 193010
UX 290896 263239
Total score 1251512 1041899
Samples [139 tests] [140 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 187.2 MB/sec 157.5 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 98.5 pages/sec 83.5 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 138.9 Mpixels/sec 116.6 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 73.4 images/sec 59.8 images/sec
HDR 119.7 Mpixels/sec 96.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 15.9 images/sec 11.7 images/sec
Photo processing 34.9 images/sec 26.5 images/sec
Ray tracing 5.13 Mpixels/sec 4.29 Mpixels/sec
Samples 25 tests 14 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 13.8 images/sec 8.39 images/sec
Face detection 6.57 images/sec 4.05 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.23 Gpixels/sec 0.16 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.29 Gpixels/sec 0.2 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.41 Gpixels/sec 0.31 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.1 Gpixels/sec 0.05 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 30.7 Gpixels/sec 17.4 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 727.6 FPS 628.9 FPS
API Vulkan Vulkan
Samples 19 tests 12 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 655 379
Stability 98% -
Graphics test 5 FPS 3 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 12398 13557
Video editing score 7114 7169
Data manipulation score 10983 11111
Photo editing score 23206 21690
Writing score 16063 16942
Phones tested 3 models 8 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 1580
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-04 (Neagu Mihai)GeekBench CPU1348 / 3823
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-04 (Neagu Mihai)AnTuTu1287132
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-19 (Ferran)AnTuTu1269203
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-11 (Datssemble)GeekBench CPU1349 / 3757
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-18 (Claus)AnTuTu1264715
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-15 (Floyd)AnTuTu1054677
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-14 (nandoAp)AnTuTu1091436
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-31 (SilentSPHINX)AnTuTu936025
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-11 (Đat)AnTuTu959029
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-04 (Chicha | #LYT-600)AnTuTu1059547

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 1580 and Snapdragon 7s Gen 3

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
1x 2.5 GHz – Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720)
3x 2.4 GHz – Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2900 MHz 2500 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv9.2-A
L2 cache 512 KB -
L3 cache 4 MB -
Process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 540 Adreno 810
Architecture RDNA 3 Adreno 800
GPU frequency 1300 MHz 1050 MHz
Pipelines 2 2
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 256 256
FLOPS 1331.2 Gigaflops 537.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.4 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
NPU theoretical performance 14.7 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 25.6 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 1920 x 1200
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 18 -
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 5100 Mbps Up to 2900 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1280 Mbps Up to 1600 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.4 5.4
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2024 August 2024
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number S5E8855 SM7635
Official page Samsung Exynos 1580 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 official site
Successor - - Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
864 (86.1%)
140 (13.9%)
Total votes: 1004

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 and Exynos 1580, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Rohit July 18, 2025 at 04:14 AM
Samsung destroyed competition among mid ranged processor with this
+35 Reply
Avatar
mohamed sherif May 29, 2025 at 11:13 AM
Snapdragon is better anyway.
+47 Reply
Avatar
DroidLover May 12, 2025 at 05:35 PM
I have a56 and i side by side compared with nothing phone 3a, i can tell the amount of stock application filled in samsung really annoying. Nothing phone look so simple and smoother
+8 Reply
Avatar
saged May 1, 2025 at 09:51 PM
i dont like samsung processor but exynos 1580 is very good
+21 Reply
Avatar
Pi90 March 9, 2025 at 03:17 AM
Che pasa! Exynos 1580 is enough power for an average user.
+26 Reply
Avatar
Blublu March 5, 2025 at 08:33 PM
So samsung A56 would be better? Than nothing 3a pro?
+34 Reply
Avatar
Pipino March 7, 2025 at 12:05 AM
Performance wise, yes. It is also better in software support, but the Nothing should have some better specs in camera, wait the reviews
+39 Reply
Avatar
BrokeCashier April 13, 2025 at 10:22 PM
Not really. Despite having higher benchmark scores, Exynos 1580's gaming performance is noticeably worse than Nothing Phone 3(a). This is mainly due to how every single game these days is fully optimized for Snapdragon chipsets. Furthermore, Exynos graphics driver sucks and Samsung never updates their driver through SW or FW updates. So don't expect to get a better performance on A56 later on.
+11 Reply
Avatar
Beast May 4, 2025 at 09:10 AM
BrokeCashier, Only game that has issue is stupid pubg / bgmi rest all games real heavy games 1580 crushes 7gen3 lol and in ray tracing based ones it destroys 7sgen3
+20 Reply
Avatar
BrokeCashier June 26, 2025 at 07:24 PM
Beast, Beast, wrong. Games like Genshin Impact, Wuthering Waves, Car X Street, etc run much better on 7s Gen 3. Warzone gets like 10fps with constant stutter on Exynos 1580. 7s gen 3 absolutely crushes Exynos 1580 in pretty much every single heavy games. And what ray tracing game are you talking about?
+1 Reply
ITZVIKTOH_77 July 9, 2025 at 05:17 PM
BrokeCashier, Warzone is a poorly optimized game in general. I play every game you mentioned except for Warzone, and they work flawlessly. I get 60 fps on all the games.
+5 Reply
Avatar
Polk August 6, 2025 at 12:50 PM
BrokeCashier, I just watched videos of gaming on the A56 vs on Nothing Phone 3a, and while the Nothing Phone 3a performed better in some games, I would say that in 80% of the games, the A56 performs better (watch newer videos for this, as the A56 was really unoptimized for games at launch)
+3 Reply