Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro vs Lenovo Tab P12
71
out of 100
VS
53
out of 100
Here we compared two mid-range tablets: the 12.7-inch Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro (with MediaTek Dimensity 8300) that was released on April 17, 2025, against the Lenovo Tab P12, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 7050 and came out 1 year and 9 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro
- Water-resistant body (IP52 classification)
- Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
- 2x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1564K versus 800K)
- Has 2x more RAM: 8GB versus 4GB
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.3)
- More recent OS version: Android 14 versus 13
- Supports higher wattage charging (45W versus 30W)
Reasons to consider the Lenovo Tab P12
- Ability to record video in 4K resolution
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 12.7 inches | 12.7 inches |
| Resolution | 2944 x 1840 pixels | 1840 x 2944 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| PPI | 273 ppi | 273 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| Max rated brightness | 400 nits | 400 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10 | No |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.8% | 83.6% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 |
| RGB color space | 93.7% | 98.6% |
| PWM | Not detected | 280300 Hz |
| Response time | 28 ms | 29 ms |
| Contrast | 918:1 | 750:1 |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 291.8 mm (11.49 inches) | 293.3 mm (11.55 inches) |
| Width | 189.1 mm (7.44 inches) | 190.7 mm (7.51 inches) |
| Thickness | 6.9 mm (0.27 inches) | 6.9 mm (0.27 inches) |
| Weight | 620 g (21.87 oz) | 612 g (21.59 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP52 | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Green | Gray, Green |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-button | Yes, in-button |
| Area | 552 cm2 (85.5 inches2) | 559 cm2 (86.7 inches2) |
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (61st and 114th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (45th and 89th place)
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 | MediaTek Dimensity 7050 |
| Max clock | 3350 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A510 - 3 cores at 3.2 GHz: Cortex-A715 - 1 core at 3.35 GHz: Cortex-A715 |
- 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A78 |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | - |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 6 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek APU 780 | MediaTek APU 550 |
| Graphics | Mali-G615 MP6 | Mali-G68 MP4 |
| GPU shading units | 768 | 128 |
| GPU clock | 1400 MHz | 950 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~2150.4 GFLOPS | ~243.2 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | - | 2392 |
| Single-core score | 1407 | 966 |
| Multi-core score | 4370 | 2424 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 458662 | 285232 |
| GPU | 368791 | 80158 |
| Memory | 303801 | 188153 |
| UX | 433346 | 247047 |
| Total score | 1564600 | 800617 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | [11 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | - | 97% |
| Graphics test | - | 2 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 233 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | - | 9630 |
| Video editing | - | 5765 |
| Photo editing | - | 28539 |
| Data manipulation | - | 8000 |
| Writing score | - | 15985 |
Recent User Tests
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-05-21 -> abangzamani92 | AnTuTu 11 | 1564600 |
Lenovo Tab P12
No benchmark results yet
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | - | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | Up to 1024 GB | Up to 1024 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| OS size | 28 GB | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 10200 mAh | 10200 mAh |
| Max charge power | 45 W | 30 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | No |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes (50% in 60 min) |
| Full charging time | - | 2:35 hr |
| Web browsing | - | 11:47 hr |
| Watching video | - | 17:12 hr |
| Gaming | - | 07:44 hr |
| Standby | - | 159 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 4128 x 3096 | - |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 13 MP |
1) Standard: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - | - |
| Image resolution | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | - | f/2.2 |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 8 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 4128 x 3096 |
| Aperture | - | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | - | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Type of SIM card | No | Nano |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | April 2025 | July 2023 |
| Release date | April 2025 | July 2023 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $315 | $349 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Fingerprint |
- Hall-effect sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 68 W | Yes, 20 W |
Further details
Notes on Moto Pad 60 Pro:
- The 128 GB version comes with slower UFS 3.1 storage.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: < 1