OnePlus Pad vs Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro

62 out of 100
OnePlus Pad
VS
71 out of 100
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro

Here we compared two mid-range tablets: the 11.61-inch OnePlus Pad (with MediaTek Dimensity 9000) that was released on February 7, 2023, against the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 8300 and came out 2 years and 3 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each tablet
Reasons to consider the OnePlus Pad
  • Supports higher wattage charging (67W versus 45W)
  • Ability to record video in 4K resolution
  • Delivers 12% higher peak brightness (439 against 392 nits)
  • More recent OS version: Android 15 versus 14
  • Smaller footprint: 11% more compact case (75.8 vs 85.6 square inches)
  • 20% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1691 and 1407 points
  • Weighs 68 grams less
Reasons to consider the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro
  • Water-resistant body (IP52 classification)
  • Has a 1.09 inches larger screen size
  • Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 1024GB
  • Fingerprint scanner
  • 31% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1564K versus 1190K)
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.0 versus UFS 3.1
  • Reverse charging feature

Review

Evaluation of OnePlus Pad and Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 128 GB
VS
8 / 128 GB
56.1
(Average)
Value Index
98.7
(Very good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Size 11.61 inches 12.7 inches
Resolution 2000 x 2800 pixels 2944 x 1840 pixels
Aspect ratio 7:5 16:10
PPI 296 ppi 273 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No Yes
Max rated brightness 500 nits 400 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10
Screen protection Tempered glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 84.2% 84.8%
Display features - DCI-P3 - DCI-P3
Display tests
RGB color space 99.8% 93.7%
PWM 60 Hz Not detected
Response time 20 ms 28 ms
Contrast 1481:1 918:1
Screen space comparison
Moto Pad 60 Pro
12.7″ (16:10 ratio) = 72.5 in2
OnePlus Pad
11.61″ (7:5 ratio) = 63.8 in2
~13% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
439 nits
392 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 258.03 mm (10.16 inches) 291.8 mm (11.49 inches)
Width 189.41 mm (7.46 inches) 189.1 mm (7.44 inches)
Thickness 6.54 mm (0.26 inches) 6.9 mm (0.27 inches)
Weight 552 g (19.47 oz) 620 g (21.87 oz)
Waterproof No IP52
Rear material Metal Metal
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Green Green
Fingerprint scanner No Yes, in-button
Area 489 cm2 (75.8 inches2) 552 cm2 (85.5 inches2)
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
84.2%
84.8%
Tablet Ranking (89th and 61st place)
Android Tablet Ranking (67th and 45th place)

Performance

Chipset specifications of OnePlus Pad and Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9000 MediaTek Dimensity 8300
Max clock 3050 MHz 3350 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A510
- 3 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-A710
- 1 core at 3.05 GHz: Cortex-X2
- 4 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A510
- 3 cores at 3.2 GHz: Cortex-A715
- 1 core at 3.35 GHz: Cortex-A715
L3 cache 8 MB 4 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 590 MediaTek APU 780
GPU
Graphics Mali-G710 MC10 Mali-G615 MP6
GPU shading units 640 768
GPU clock 848 MHz 1400 MHz
FLOPS ~1085.4 GFLOPS ~2150.4 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of OnePlus Pad and Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
1691
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 6296 -
Single-core score 1691 1407
Multi-core score 4386 4370
Sources: Geekbench [3]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
1190167
1564600
CPU 410160 458662
GPU 253720 368791
Memory 203220 303801
UX 323067 433346
Total score 1190167 1564600
Samples Less than 3 Less than 3
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 99% -
Graphics test 6 FPS -
Graphics score 787 -
Sources: 3DMark [5]

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
OnePlus Pad
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2025-10-25 (Akash)AnTuTu 111190167
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-05-21 -> abangzamani92AnTuTu 111564600

Memory

Configuration
RAM
RAM size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5X
Memory clock 3200 MHz -
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 128 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 4.0
Memory card No MicroSD
Memory card max size - Up to 1024 GB

Software

Operating system Android 13 (Can be upgraded to Android 15) Android 14
ROM OxygenOS 15 -
OS size 23 GB 28 GB

Battery

Capacity 9510 mAh 10200 mAh
Max charge power 67 W 45 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging No Yes
Fast charging Yes (50% in 30 min) Yes
Full charging time 1:18 hr -
Battery life tests
Web browsing 08:15 hr -
Watching video 12:45 hr -
Gaming 05:59 hr -
Standby 112 hr -
General battery life

Main camera

Matrix 13 megapixels 13 megapixels
Image resolution 4160 x 3120 4128 x 3096
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 30FPS No
1080p video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
Slow motion No -
Lenses 1) Standard: 13 MP
1) Standard: 13 MP
Camera features - -
Standard lens
Image resolution 13 MP 13 MP
Aperture f/2.2 -
Focal length 23 mm -
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 8 megapixels 8 megapixels
Aperture f/2.3 -
Sensor CMOS -
Sensor size 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.3 5.3
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Galileo
NFC* No No
Infrared port No No
Network
Type of SIM card No No
eSIM support* - No
Hybrid slot - No
5G support No No

Sound

Speakers 4.0 4.0
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
86.6 dB
85.5 dB

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced February 2023 April 2025
Release date April 2023 April 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $479 $315
Successor - OnePlus Pad 3 -
Sensors - Hall-effect sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Fingerprint
Keyboard weight 360 g -
Bundled charger Yes, 67 W Yes, 68 W
Further details
Notes on Moto Pad 60 Pro:
    - The 128 GB version comes with slower UFS 3.1 storage.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which tablet would you choose?
0 (0%)
6 (100%)
Total votes: 6

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!