Xiaomi Poco Pad vs Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro
64
out of 100
VS
71
out of 100
Here we compared two mid-range tablets: the 12.1-inch Xiaomi Poco Pad (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2) that was released on May 23, 2024, against the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 8300 and came out 11 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco Pad
- Weighs 49 grams less
- Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Reasons to consider the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro
- 2x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1564K versus 778K)
- Higher display refresh rate β 144 Hz
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.3)
- Fingerprint scanner
- Supports higher wattage charging (45W versus 33W)
- Faster storage type - UFS 4.0 versus UFS 2.2
- 10% higher pixel density (273 vs 249 PPI)
- 36% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1407 and 1032 points
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 12.1 inches | 12.7 inches |
| Resolution | 1600 x 2560 pixels | 2944 x 1840 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| PPI | 249 ppi | 273 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 600 nits | 400 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, HDR10 |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.4% | 84.8% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 |
| RGB color space | - | 93.7% |
| PWM | - | Not detected |
| Response time | - | 28 ms |
| Contrast | - | 918:1 |
Screen space comparison
Moto Pad 60 Pro
12.7β³ (16:10 ratio) = 72.5 in2
Poco Pad
12.1β³ (16:10 ratio) = 65.8 in2
~10% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 280 mm (11.02 inches) | 291.8 mm (11.49 inches) |
| Width | 181.85 mm (7.16 inches) | 189.1 mm (7.44 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.52 mm (0.3 inches) | 6.9 mm (0.27 inches) |
| Weight | 571 g (20.14 oz) | 620 g (21.87 oz) |
| Waterproof | - | IP52 |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray, Blue | Green |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | Yes, in-button |
| Area | 509 cm2 (78.9 inches2) | 552 cm2 (85.5 inches2) |
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (87th and 61st place)
Android Tablet Ranking (66th and 45th place)
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 |
| Max clock | 2400 MHz | 3350 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.95 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A78 |
- 4 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A510 - 3 cores at 3.2 GHz: Cortex-A715 - 1 core at 3.35 GHz: Cortex-A715 |
| L3 cache | - | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | MediaTek APU 780 |
| Graphics | Adreno 710 | Mali-G615 MP6 |
| GPU shading units | 256 | 768 |
| GPU clock | 940 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~481.3 GFLOPS | ~2150.4 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 2314 | - |
| Single-core score | 1032 | 1407 |
| Multi-core score | 2976 | 4370 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 297225 | 458662 |
| GPU | 73188 | 368791 |
| Memory | 152467 | 303801 |
| UX | 255286 | 433346 |
| Total score | 778166 | 1564600 |
| Samples | [2 tests] | Less than 3 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 13631 | - |
| Video editing | 6946 | - |
| Photo editing | 24734 | - |
| Data manipulation | 11507 | - |
| Writing score | 13590 | - |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Poco Pad
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-03-29 (SRG) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 1025 / 2768 |
| π 2026-03-28 (SRG) | AnTuTu 11 | 770063 |
| π 2026-01-15 (Jeff) | AnTuTu 11 | 778166 |
| π 2025-04-20 (Vxmpiri) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 2314 |
| π 2025-04-20 (Vxmpiri) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 1032 / 2976 |
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-05-21 -> abangzamani92 | AnTuTu 11 | 1564600 |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | - |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | Up to 1024 GB | Up to 1024 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| ROM | HyperOS 1.0 | - |
| OS size | - | 28 GB |
Battery
| Capacity | 10000 mAh | 10200 mAh |
| Max charge power | 33 W | 45 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (29% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full charging time | 2:00 hr | - |
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 4128 x 3096 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Slow motion | No | - |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 13 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode | - |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (β 0.25 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 8 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Sensor | CMOS | - |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (β 0.25 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/a/ac) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| GPS | - | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 1 | - |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | No |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | Yes | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | May 2024 | April 2025 |
| Release date | May 2024 | April 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | $315 |
| Sensors | - Hall-effect sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 33 W | Yes, 68 W |
Further details
Notes on Poco Pad:
- The 5G model has water resistance, a 128 GB memory option, and GPS. The Wi-Fi model has none of these features.
Notes on Moto Pad 60 Pro:
- The 128 GB version comes with slower UFS 3.1 storage.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 1