OnePlus Pad 2 vs Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro
74
out of 100
VS
71
out of 100
Here we compared two tablets: the 12.1-inch OnePlus Pad 2 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3) that was released on July 16, 2024, against the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 8300 and came out 9 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the OnePlus Pad 2
- Delivers 102% higher peak brightness (793 against 392 nits)
- 58% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2465K versus 1564K)
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
- Supports higher wattage charging (67W versus 45W)
- Ability to record video in 4K resolution
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- More recent OS version: Android 15 versus 14
- 11% higher pixel density (304 vs 273 PPI)
- 59% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2232 and 1407 points
Reasons to consider the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro
- Water-resistant body (IP52 classification)
- Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 1024GB
- Fingerprint scanner
- Faster storage type - UFS 4.0 versus UFS 3.1
- Reverse charging feature
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 12.1 inches | 12.7 inches |
| Resolution | 2120 x 3000 pixels | 2944 x 1840 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 7:5 | 16:10 |
| PPI | 304 ppi | 273 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (30-144 Hz) | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 900 nits | 400 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10 |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.2% | 84.8% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 |
| RGB color space | - | 93.7% |
| PWM | - | Not detected |
| Response time | - | 28 ms |
| Contrast | - | 918:1 |
Screen space comparison
Moto Pad 60 Pro
12.7β³ (16:10 ratio) = 72.5 in2
Pad 2
12.1β³ (7:5 ratio) = 69.2 in2
~4% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 268.7 mm (10.58 inches) | 291.8 mm (11.49 inches) |
| Width | 195.1 mm (7.68 inches) | 189.1 mm (7.44 inches) |
| Thickness | 6.5 mm (0.26 inches) | 6.9 mm (0.27 inches) |
| Weight | 584 g (20.6 oz) | 620 g (21.87 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | IP52 |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray | Green |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | Yes, in-button |
| Area | 524 cm2 (81.3 inches2) | 552 cm2 (85.5 inches2) |
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (50th and 61st place)
Android Tablet Ranking (36th and 45th place)
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 |
| Max clock | 3300 MHz | 3350 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 2 cores at 2.27 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 2 cores at 2.96 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.15 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
- 4 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A510 - 3 cores at 3.2 GHz: Cortex-A715 - 1 core at 3.35 GHz: Cortex-A715 |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | MediaTek APU 780 |
| Graphics | Adreno 750 | Mali-G615 MP6 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 768 |
| GPU clock | 903-1000 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~2774 GFLOPS | ~2150.4 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 13973 | - |
| Single-core score | 2232 | 1407 |
| Multi-core score | 6715 | 4370 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 832412 | 458662 |
| GPU | 816369 | 368791 |
| Memory | 282439 | 303801 |
| UX | 534458 | 433346 |
| Total score | 2465678 | 1564600 |
| Samples | [3 tests] | Less than 3 |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 89% | - |
| Graphics test | 12 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 1622 | - |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 31 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 35 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 31 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 26 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 8032 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 11703 | - |
| Video editing | 6168 | - |
| Photo editing | 23642 | - |
| Data manipulation | 13108 | - |
| Writing score | 13852 | - |
Recent User Tests
OnePlus Pad 2
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-23 (Zeeshan Ali) | AnTuTu 11 | 2317592 |
| π 2026-09-06 (Ashish) | AnTuTu 11 | 2259113 |
| π 2026-07-14 (BhullarOp) | AnTuTu 11 | 2197635 |
| π 2026-01-14 (winterofhell) | AnTuTu 11 | 2579463 |
| π 2025-12-25 (highsocialdude) | AnTuTu 11 | 2465678 |
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-05-21 -> abangzamani92 | AnTuTu 11 | 1564600 |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 4200 MHz | - |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | - | Up to 1024 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 15) | Android 14 |
| ROM | OxygenOS 15 | - |
| OS size | - | 28 GB |
Battery
| Capacity | 9510 mAh | 10200 mAh |
| Max charge power | 67 W | 45 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (65% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full charging time | 0:56 hr | - |
| Web browsing | 08:27 hr | - |
| Watching video | 09:12 hr | - |
| Gaming | 06:18 hr | - |
| Standby | 125 hr | - |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 4160 x 3120 | 4128 x 3096 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 13 MP |
1) Standard: 13 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- |
| Image resolution | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | - |
| Focal length | 23 mm | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 8 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | - |
| Aperture | f/2.3 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (β 0.25 inch) | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | - | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Type of SIM card | No | No |
| eSIM support* | - | No |
| Hybrid slot | - | No |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 6.0 | 4.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | July 2024 | April 2025 |
| Release date | August 2024 | April 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $549 | $315 |
| Successor | - OnePlus Pad 3 | - |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Fingerprint |
| Keyboard weight | 504 g | - |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Yes, 68 W |
Further details
Notes on Moto Pad 60 Pro:
- The 128 GB version comes with slower UFS 3.1 storage.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the camera, performance, gaming, connectivity, and software are more important to you, then choose the OnePlus Pad 2. But if the battery life and sound are more of a priority β go for the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 8