Xiaomi Pad 7 vs Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro
70
out of 100
VS
71
out of 100
Here we compared two mid-range tablets: the 11.2-inch Xiaomi Pad 7 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3) that was released on October 29, 2024, against the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 8300 and came out 6 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Pad 7
- Delivers 107% higher peak brightness (813 against 392 nits)
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
- Ability to record video in 4K resolution
- More recent OS version: Android 15 versus 14
- 26% higher pixel density (344 vs 273 PPI)
- Much smaller footprint: 21% more compact case (67.6 vs 85.6 square inches)
- 31% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1843 and 1407 points
- Weighs 120 grams less
- Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro
- Water-resistant body (IP52 classification)
- Has a 1.5 inches larger screen size
- Comes with 1350 mAh larger battery capacity: 10200 vs 8850 mAh
- Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 1024GB
- Fingerprint scanner
- Reverse charging feature
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 11.2 inches | 12.7 inches |
| Resolution | 2136 x 3200 pixels | 2944 x 1840 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 16:10 |
| PPI | 344 ppi | 273 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | - | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 800 nits | 400 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, HDR10 |
| Touch sampling rate | 360 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.7% | 84.8% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 |
| RGB color space | 97.3% | 93.7% |
| PWM | Not detected | Not detected |
| Response time | 23 ms | 28 ms |
| Contrast | 952:1 | 918:1 |
Screen space comparison
Moto Pad 60 Pro
12.7β³ (16:10 ratio) = 72.5 in2
Pad 7
11.2β³ (3:2 ratio) = 57.9 in2
~25% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 251.22 mm (9.89 inches) | 291.8 mm (11.49 inches) |
| Width | 173.42 mm (6.83 inches) | 189.1 mm (7.44 inches) |
| Thickness | 6.18 mm (0.24 inches) | 6.9 mm (0.27 inches) |
| Weight | 500 g (17.64 oz) | 620 g (21.87 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | IP52 |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Black, Blue, Green | Green |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | Yes, in-button |
| Area | 436 cm2 (67.5 inches2) | 552 cm2 (85.5 inches2) |
| Repairability | Average (2.74/5) | - |
| Drop resistance | Very good (B) Β· 208 drops | - |
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (62nd and 61st place)
Android Tablet Ranking (46th and 45th place)
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3 | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 |
| Max clock | 2800 MHz | 3350 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 4 + 3) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 3 cores at 1.9 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 4 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
- 4 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A510 - 3 cores at 3.2 GHz: Cortex-A715 - 1 core at 3.35 GHz: Cortex-A715 |
| L3 cache | - | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | MediaTek APU 780 |
| Graphics | Adreno 732 | Mali-G615 MP6 |
| GPU shading units | 768 | 768 |
| GPU clock | 950 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~1459.2 GFLOPS | ~2150.4 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 8926 | - |
| Single-core score | 1843 | 1407 |
| Multi-core score | 4978 | 4370 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 552288 | 458662 |
| GPU | 419835 | 368791 |
| Memory | 290516 | 303801 |
| UX | 434805 | 433346 |
| Total score | 1697444 | 1564600 |
| Samples | [18 tests] | Less than 3 |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 98% | - |
| Graphics test | 7 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 967 | - |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Pad 7
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-08-29 (SmokerPH) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 9571 |
| π 2026-08-29 (SmokerPH) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 1884 / 5226 |
| π 2026-07-05 (Aditay) | AnTuTu 11 | 1672445 |
| π 2026-07-04 (Samarth Kawade) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 1918 / 5161 |
| π 2026-07-04 (Samarth Kawade) | AnTuTu 11 | 1776424 |
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-05-21 -> abangzamani92 | AnTuTu 11 | 1564600 |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 4200 MHz | - |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | - | Up to 1024 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| ROM | HyperOS 2.0 | - |
| OS size | 32 GB | 28 GB |
| OS updates | 5 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 8850 mAh | 10200 mAh |
| Max charge power | 45 W | 45 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (50% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full charging time | 1:20 hr | - |
| Battery cycles | 1000 cycles | - |
| Web browsing | 10:46 hr | - |
| Watching video | 15:40 hr | - |
| Gaming | 07:07 hr | - |
| Standby | 128 hr | - |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 4160 x 3120 | 4128 x 3096 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 13 MP |
1) Standard: 13 MP |
| Camera features | - | - |
| Image resolution | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | - |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV13B10 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/3.06" (β 0.33 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 8 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Aperture | f/2.3 | - |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV08D10 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (β 0.25 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | - | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | Yes | No |
| Type of SIM card | No | No |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | - | No |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | October 2024 | April 2025 |
| Release date | October 2024 | April 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | $315 |
| Successor | - Xiaomi Pad 8 | - |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 45 W | Yes, 68 W |
Further details
Notes on Pad 7:
- The 128 GB variant features UFS 3.1 memory, other models have UFS 4.0.
Notes on Moto Pad 60 Pro:
- The 128 GB version comes with slower UFS 3.1 storage.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the camera and battery life are more important to you, then choose the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro. But if the performance, gaming, and software are more of a priority β go for the Xiaomi Pad 7.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 50