OnePlus Pad Lite vs Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro
Here we compared two mid-range tablets: the 11-inch OnePlus Pad Lite (with MediaTek Helio G100) that was released on July 8, 2025, against the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 8300 and came out 2 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the OnePlus Pad Lite
- More recent OS version: Android 15 versus 14
- Much smaller footprint: 23% more compact case (65.7 vs 85.6 square inches)
- Weighs 90 grams less
Reasons to consider the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro
- Water-resistant body (IP52 classification)
- 2.7x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1564K versus 570K)
- Has a 1.7 inches larger screen size
- Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
- Comes with 860 mAh larger battery capacity: 10200 vs 9340 mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.3)
- Fingerprint scanner
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
- Has 33% more RAM: 8GB versus 6GB
- 32% higher pixel density (273 vs 207 PPI)
- Supports higher wattage charging (45W versus 33W)
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 11 inches | 12.7 inches |
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels | 2944 x 1840 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| PPI | 207 ppi | 273 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 500 nits | 400 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes, HDR10 |
| Touch sampling rate | 180 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.7% | 84.8% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 |
| RGB color space | - | 93.7% |
| PWM | - | Not detected |
| Response time | - | 28 ms |
| Contrast | - | 918:1 |
Screen space comparison
Moto Pad 60 Pro
12.7″ (16:10 ratio) = 72.5 in2
Pad Lite
11″ (16:10 ratio) = 54.4 in2
~33% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 254.91 mm (10.04 inches) | 291.8 mm (11.49 inches) |
| Width | 166.46 mm (6.55 inches) | 189.1 mm (7.44 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.39 mm (0.29 inches) | 6.9 mm (0.27 inches) |
| Weight | 530 g (18.69 oz) | 620 g (21.87 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | IP52 |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Blue | Green |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | Yes, in-button |
| Area | 424 cm2 (65.8 inches2) | 552 cm2 (85.5 inches2) |
| Repairability | Good (3.73/5) | - |
| Drop resistance | Bad (E) · 10 drops | - |
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (106th and 59th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (81st and 43rd place)
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G100 | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 |
| Max clock | 2200 MHz | 3350 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A76 |
- 4 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A510 - 3 cores at 3.2 GHz: Cortex-A715 - 1 core at 3.35 GHz: Cortex-A715 |
| L3 cache | - | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 6 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | MediaTek APU 780 |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G615 MP6 |
| GPU shading units | 64 | 768 |
| GPU clock | 1000 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~128 GFLOPS | ~2150.4 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
| Single-core score | 729 | 1407 |
| Multi-core score | 2031 | 4370 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 219481 | 458662 |
| GPU | 48406 | 368791 |
| Memory | 146071 | 303801 |
| UX | 156511 | 433346 |
| Total score | 570469 | 1564600 |
| Samples | [74 tests] | Less than 3 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 11014 | - |
| Video editing | 6369 | - |
| Photo editing | 20895 | - |
| Data manipulation | 6712 | - |
| Writing score | 10550 | - |
Recent User Tests
OnePlus Pad Lite
No benchmark results yet
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-05-21 -> abangzamani92 | AnTuTu | 1564600 |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | - |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | - | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | - | Up to 1024 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| ROM | OxygenOS 15 | - |
| OS size | - | 28 GB |
| OS updates | 6 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 9340 mAh | 10200 mAh |
| Max charge power | 33 W | 45 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery cycles | 800 cycles | - |
Main camera
| Matrix | 5 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 4128 x 3096 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | No | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 5 MP |
1) Standard: 13 MP |
| Camera features | - | - |
| Image resolution | 5 MP | 13 MP |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 5 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Sensor | CMOS | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | - | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| GPS | - | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 1 | - |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | No |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | - |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | - | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | July 2025 | April 2025 |
| Release date | July 2025 | April 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | $315 |
| Sensors | - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Yes, 68 W |
Further details
Notes on Pad Lite:
- Only the higher-end version with 8/256 GB of storage supports LTE.
Notes on Moto Pad 60 Pro:
- The 128 GB version comes with slower UFS 3.1 storage.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 1