Vivo Pad 5 Pro vs Oppo Pad 5
Here we compared two flagship tablets: the 13-inch Vivo Pad 5 Pro (with MediaTek Dimensity 9400) that was released on April 21, 2025, against the Oppo Pad 5, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus and came out 6 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo Pad 5 Pro
- Has a 0.9 inch larger screen size
- Comes with 1630 mAh larger battery capacity: 12050 vs 10420 mAh
Reasons to consider the Oppo Pad 5
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- Smaller footprint: 10% more compact case (80 vs 89 square inches)
- Weighs 58 grams less
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 13 inches | 12.1 inches |
| Resolution | 2064 x 3096 pixels | 2120 x 3000 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 7:5 |
| PPI | 286 ppi | 304 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 1200 nits | 900 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10 | - |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.6% | 86.5% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 |
| RGB color space | 99.5% | - |
| PWM | Not detected | - |
| Response time | 48 ms | - |
| Contrast | 1366:1 | - |
Screen space comparison
Pad 5 Pro
13″ (3:2 ratio) = 78 in2
Pad 5
12.1″ (7:5 ratio) = 69.2 in2
~12% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 289.56 mm (11.4 inches) | 266.9 mm (10.51 inches) |
| Width | 198.32 mm (7.81 inches) | 193.4 mm (7.61 inches) |
| Thickness | 6.64 mm (0.26 inches) | 6 mm (0.24 inches) |
| Weight | 635 g (22.4 oz) | 577 g (20.35 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Gray, Blue, Pink | Silver, Gray, Purple |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | No |
| Area | 574 cm2 (89 inches2) | 516 cm2 (80 inches2) |
| Repairability | - | Good (3.49/5) |
| Drop resistance | - | Bad (E) · 10 drops |
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (31st and 23rd place)
Android Tablet Ranking (23rd and 17th place)
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus |
| Max clock | 3630 MHz | 3630 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.62 GHz: Cortex-X925 |
- 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.73 GHz: Cortex-X925 |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 12 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU 890 | MediaTek NPU 890 |
| Graphics | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1612 MHz | 1612 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~4952.1 GFLOPS | ~4952.1 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 24474 | 21671 |
| Single-core score | 2738 | 2762 |
| Multi-core score | 8542 | 8560 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 889187 | 838002 |
| GPU | 966129 | 1024333 |
| Memory | 370036 | 398068 |
| UX | 600124 | 612893 |
| Total score | 2825476 | 2873296 |
| Samples | [51 tests] | [114 tests] |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 5333 MHz | - |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| ROM | OriginOS 5 | ColorOS 16 |
| OS size | 17 GB | - |
| OS updates | - | 5 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 12050 mAh | 10420 mAh |
| Max charge power | 66 W | 67 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery cycles | - | 1200 cycles |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 4160 x 3120 | - |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Slow motion | - | No |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 13 MP |
1) Standard: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode | - |
| Image resolution | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 8 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3264 x 2448 |
| Aperture | - | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | - | 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Type of SIM card | No | No |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 8.0 | 4.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | - |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | April 2025 | October 2025 |
| Release date | April 2025 | October 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $539 | $499 |
| Successor | - | - Oppo Pad 3 Pro |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor |
- Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Compass |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 66 W | Yes, 67 W |
Further details
Notes on Pad 5 Pro:
- The 128GB model has UFS 3.1, while 256GB and 512GB use UFS 4.1.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
These tablets have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Oppo Pad 5. It has a better display, camera, software, and sound.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 40