Home > Tablet comparison > Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro vs Oppo Pad 5 – which one to choose?

Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro vs Oppo Pad 5

85 out of 100
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
VS
84 out of 100
Oppo Pad 5
Pad 8 Pro
Pad 5

Here we compared two tablets: the 11.2-inch Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon Elite) that was released on September 25, 2025, against the Oppo Pad 5, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory
  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery life
  6. Camera
  7. Comments

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each tablet
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
  • Fingerprint scanner
  • 10% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3153K versus 2873K)
  • Much smaller footprint: 16% more compact case (67.6 vs 80 square inches)
  • 13% higher pixel density (344 vs 304 PPI)
  • Reverse charging feature
  • Weighs 92 grams less
  • 10% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3028 and 2762 points
  • Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Oppo Pad 5
  • Has a 0.9 inch larger screen size
  • Comes with 1220 mAh larger battery capacity: 10420 vs 9200 mAh

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro and Oppo Pad 5 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Pad 8 Pro
81
Pad 5
83*
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Pad 8 Pro
85
Pad 5
84*
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 128 GB
VS
8 / 128 GB
79.7
(Good)
Value Index
53.1
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Tablet:
Pad 8 Pro
vs
Pad 5

Display

Type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Size 11.2 inches 12.1 inches
Resolution 2136 x 3200 pixels 2120 x 3000 pixels
Aspect ratio 3:2 7:5
PPI 344 ppi 304 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes
Max rated brightness 800 nits 900 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision -
Touch sampling rate 360 Hz -
Screen protection Tempered glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 85.7% 86.5%
Display features - DCI-P3 - DCI-P3
Display tests
RGB color space 99.8% -
PWM Not detected -
Response time 28 ms -
Contrast 2087:1 -
Screen space comparison
Pad 5
12.1″ (7:5 ratio) = 69.2 in2
Pad 8 Pro
11.2″ (3:2 ratio) = 57.9 in2
~19% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Pad 8 Pro
809 nits
Pad 5
n/a
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 251.22 mm (9.89 inches) 266.9 mm (10.51 inches)
Width 173.42 mm (6.83 inches) 193.4 mm (7.61 inches)
Thickness 5.75 mm (0.23 inches) 6 mm (0.24 inches)
Weight 485 g (17.11 oz) 577 g (20.35 oz)
Waterproof No No
Rear material Metal Metal
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Gray, Blue, Green Silver, Gray, Purple
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-button No
Area 436 cm2 (67.5 inches2) 516 cm2 (80 inches2)
Repairability Average (2.74/5) Good (3.49/5)
Drop resistance Very good (B) · 208 drops Bad (E) · 10 drops
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Pad 8 Pro
85.7%
Pad 5 +1%
86.5%
Tablet Ranking (22nd and 23rd place)
Android Tablet Ranking (16th and 17th place)

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro and Oppo Pad 5
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon Elite MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
Max clock 4320 MHz 3630 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)		 - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 1 core at 3.73 GHz: Cortex-X925
L3 cache 8 MB 12 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon MediaTek NPU 890
GPU
Graphics Adreno 830 Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1100 MHz 1612 MHz
FLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS ~4952.1 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro and Oppo Pad 5
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Pad 8 Pro +10%
3028
Pad 5
2762
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Pad 8 Pro +12%
9557
Pad 5
8560
Compute Score (GPU)
Pad 8 Pro +13%
24482
Pad 5
21671
Compute Score (GPU) 24482 21671
Single-core score 3028 2762
Multi-core score 9557 8560
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
Pad 8 Pro +10%
3153053
Pad 5
2873296
CPU 950473 838002
GPU 1169909 1024333
Memory 360775 398068
UX 671896 612893
Total score 3153053 2873296
Samples [7 tests] [114 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Pad 8 Pro
2476
Pad 5
n/a
Graphics test 18 FPS -
Graphics score 2476 -
3DMark Solar Bay
Pad 8 Pro
11483
Pad 5
n/a
Graphics test 44 FPS -
Section 1 49 FPS -
Section 2 44 FPS -
Section 3 37 FPS -
Graphics score 11483 -
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
Pad 8 Pro
18343
Pad 5
n/a
Web score 20463 -
Video editing 8142 -
Photo editing 35214 -
Data manipulation 16669 -
Writing score 20187 -
Submit your benchmark results

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-18 (Ровный Вась на районе)AnTuTu 123372673
📘 2026-09-14 (Jopher Gayeta)AnTuTu 123170305
📘 2026-08-13 (Zei)Geekbench 6 CPU3028 / 9557
📘 2026-08-13 (Zei)AnTuTu 113206291
📘 2026-08-08 (Fadhilah sinaga)AnTuTu 113095623
Add View all (11)
Oppo Pad 5
No benchmark results yet
Add

Memory

Configuration
RAM
RAM size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz -
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 128 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 16
ROM HyperOS 3 ColorOS 16
OS size 50 GB -
OS updates 5 years 5 years

Battery

Capacity 9200 mAh 10420 mAh
Max charge power 67 W 67 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes No
Fast charging Yes (52% in 30 min) Yes
Full charging time 1:17 hr -
Battery cycles 1000 cycles 1200 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 08:46 hr -
Watching video 12:31 hr -
Gaming 07:23 hr -
Standby 175 hr -
General battery life
Pad 8 Pro
27:53 hr
Pad 5
n/a
Add your battery life

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 8 megapixels
Image resolution 8160 x 6144 -
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 30FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 30FPS
Slow motion - No
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
1) Standard: 8 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode -
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/2.2
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 -
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) -
Pixel size 0.64 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 8 megapixels
Image resolution 6528 x 4896 3264 x 2448
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Sensor Omnivision OV32D CMOS
Sensor size 1/3.6" (≈ 0.28 inch) 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size 0.61 micron 1.12 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
NFC* No No
Infrared port Yes No
Network
Type of SIM card No No
eSIM support* No No
5G support No No

Sound

Speakers 4.0 4.0
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes -
Speakers test
Max loudness
Pad 8 Pro
86.3 dB
Pad 5
n/a

Other

Category Mid-range Flagship
Announced September 2025 October 2025
Release date September 2025 October 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $499 $499
Successor - - Oppo Pad 3 Pro
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint		 - Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Compass
Bundled charger Yes, 67 W Yes, 67 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

These tablets have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro. It has a better performance, gaming, software, and sound.

Cast your vote

So, which tablet would you choose?
3 (37.5%)
5 (62.5%)
Total votes: 8

Related comparisons

1. Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro vs Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
2. Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro vs Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro
3. Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro vs Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (2025)
4. Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro vs Xiaomi Pad Mini (2)
5. Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
6. Oppo Pad 5 vs OnePlus Pad 2
7. Oppo Pad 5 vs Vivo Pad 5 Pro
8. Oppo Pad 5 vs Oppo Pad 3 Pro
9. Oppo Pad 5 vs Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
10. Oppo Pad 5 vs Apple iPad Air 11" (7th Gen, 2025)
Compare other tablets (80+)

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
EnglishРусский