Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra vs Vivo Pad 6 Pro
86
out of 100
VS
89
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship tablets: the 14-inch Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra (with Xiaomi Xring O1) that was released on May 22, 2025, against the Vivo Pad 6 Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 and came out 11 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
- Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
- Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 66W)
- Fingerprint scanner
- OLED display (versus competitor's IPS LCD)
- Weighs 54 grams less
- Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Vivo Pad 6 Pro
- 40% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (4152K versus 2963K)
- Comes with 1000 mAh larger battery capacity: 13000 vs 12000 mAh
- Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- 27% higher pixel density (348 vs 275 PPI)
- 37% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3747 and 2737 points
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | OLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 14 inches | 13.2 inches |
| Resolution | 2136 x 3200 pixels | 2512 x 3840 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 |
| PPI | 275 ppi | 348 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | - |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 1600 nits | 1200 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, HDR10 |
| Touch sampling rate | 360 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 92% | 87.5% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 |
Screen space comparison
Pad 7 Ultra
14″ (3:2 ratio) = 90.5 in2
Pad 6 Pro
13.2″ (3:2 ratio) = 80.4 in2
~12% more screen space
Design and build
| Height | 305.82 mm (12.04 inches) | 297 mm (11.69 inches) |
| Width | 207.47 mm (8.17 inches) | 199.8 mm (7.87 inches) |
| Thickness | 5.1 mm (0.2 inches) | 6.2 mm (0.24 inches) |
| Weight | 609 g (21.48 oz) | 663 g (23.39 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray, Blue | Gray, Blue, Purple |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-button | No |
| Area | 634 cm2 (98.4 inches2) | 593 cm2 (92 inches2) |
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (17th and 9th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (13th and 7th place)
Performance
| Chipset | Xiaomi Xring O1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| Max clock | 3700 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| CPU cores | 10 (2 + 4 + 2 + 2) | - |
| Architecture | - 2 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 2 cores at 1.9 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 4 cores at 3.4 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 2 cores at 3.9 GHz: Cortex-X925 |
- |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | - |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | - |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | - |
| Graphics | Immortalis-G925 MP16 | Adreno 840 |
| GPU shading units | 2048 | - |
| GPU clock | 1392 MHz | - |
| FLOPS | ~5701.6 GFLOPS | - |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 20977 | - |
| Single-core score | 2737 | 3747 |
| Multi-core score | 9191 | 11695 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 937172 | 1110159 |
| GPU | 996086 | 1516479 |
| Memory | 409648 | 602280 |
| UX | 620146 | 923467 |
| Total score | 2963052 | 4152385 |
| Samples | [2 tests] | Less than 3 |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 93% | - |
| Graphics test | 19 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 2510 | - |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 37 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 39 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 38 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 34 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 9767 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 19150 | - |
| Video editing | 7129 | - |
| Photo editing | 29727 | - |
| Data manipulation | 18881 | - |
| Writing score | 21285 | - |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 4800 MHz | - |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| ROM | HyperOS 2.0 | OriginOS 6 |
Battery
| Capacity | 12000 mAh | 13000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 120 W | 66 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 4160 x 3120 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 13 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode | - |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | - |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 3264 x 2448 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | - |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV32D | - |
| Sensor size | 1/3.6" (≈ 0.28 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.61 micron | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | Yes | No |
| Type of SIM card | No | No |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | - | No |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | May 2025 | March 2026 |
| Release date | May 2025 | April 2026 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | - | $839 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 120 W | Yes, 66 W |
Further details
Notes on Pad 7 Ultra:
- The Nano Soft screen model is 10g heavier.
- NFC is supported for data transfer only.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the gaming and battery life are more important to you, then choose the Vivo Pad 6 Pro. But if the camera and sound are more of a priority – go for the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 5