Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro vs Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
84
out of 100
VS
86
out of 100
Here we compared two tablets: the 11.2-inch Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon Elite) that was released on September 25, 2025, against the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra, which is powered by Xiaomi Xring O1 and came out 4 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
- Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- 25% higher pixel density (344 vs 275 PPI)
- Much smaller footprint: 31% more compact case (67.6 vs 98.3 square inches)
- Weighs 124 grams less
- 11% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3028 and 2737 points
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
- Has a 2.8 inches larger screen size
- Comes with 2800 mAh larger battery capacity: 12000 vs 9200 mAh
- Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
- Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 67W)
- Thinner bezels – 6.3% more screen real estate
- OLED display (versus competitor's IPS LCD)
- CPU with a higher amount of cores (+2)
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | OLED |
| Size | 11.2 inches | 14 inches |
| Resolution | 2136 x 3200 pixels | 2136 x 3200 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 |
| PPI | 344 ppi | 275 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 800 nits | - |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | - | 1600 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | 360 Hz | 360 Hz |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.7% | 92% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 |
| RGB color space | 99.8% | - |
| PWM | Not detected | - |
| Response time | 28 ms | - |
| Contrast | 2087:1 | - |
Screen space comparison
Pad 7 Ultra
14″ (3:2 ratio) = 90.5 in2
Pad 8 Pro
11.2″ (3:2 ratio) = 57.9 in2
~56% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 251.22 mm (9.89 inches) | 305.82 mm (12.04 inches) |
| Width | 173.42 mm (6.83 inches) | 207.47 mm (8.17 inches) |
| Thickness | 5.75 mm (0.23 inches) | 5.1 mm (0.2 inches) |
| Weight | 485 g (17.11 oz) | 609 g (21.48 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray, Blue, Green | Gray, Blue |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-button | Yes, in-button |
| Area | 436 cm2 (67.5 inches2) | 634 cm2 (98.4 inches2) |
| Repairability | Average (2.74/5) | - |
| Drop resistance | Very good (B) · 208 drops | - |
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (24th and 17th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (18th and 13th place)
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon Elite | Xiaomi Xring O1 |
| Max clock | 4320 MHz | 3700 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 10 (2 + 4 + 2 + 2) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M) - 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L) |
- 2 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 2 cores at 1.9 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 4 cores at 3.4 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 2 cores at 3.9 GHz: Cortex-X925 |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | - |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 830 | Immortalis-G925 MP16 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 2048 |
| GPU clock | 1100 MHz | 1392 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3379.2 GFLOPS | ~5701.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 24482 | 20977 |
| Single-core score | 3028 | 2737 |
| Multi-core score | 9557 | 9191 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 950473 | 937172 |
| GPU | 1169909 | 996086 |
| Memory | 360775 | 409648 |
| UX | 671896 | 620146 |
| Total score | 3153053 | 2963052 |
| Samples | [7 tests] | [2 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | - | 93% |
| Graphics test | 18 FPS | 19 FPS |
| Graphics score | 2476 | 2510 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 44 FPS | 37 FPS |
| Section 1 | 49 FPS | 39 FPS |
| Section 2 | 44 FPS | 38 FPS |
| Section 3 | 37 FPS | 34 FPS |
| Graphics score | 11483 | 9767 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 20463 | 19150 |
| Video editing | 8142 | 7129 |
| Photo editing | 35214 | 29727 |
| Data manipulation | 16669 | 18881 |
| Writing score | 20187 | 21285 |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-18 (Ровный Вась на районе) | AnTuTu 12 | 3372673 |
| 📘 2026-09-14 (Jopher Gayeta) | AnTuTu 12 | 3170305 |
| 📘 2026-08-13 (Zei) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 3028 / 9557 |
| 📘 2026-08-13 (Zei) | AnTuTu 11 | 3206291 |
| 📘 2026-08-08 (Fadhilah sinaga) | AnTuTu 11 | 3095623 |
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
No benchmark results yet
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 5300 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| ROM | HyperOS 3 | HyperOS 2.0 |
| OS size | 50 GB | - |
| OS updates | 5 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 9200 mAh | 12000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 67 W | 120 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (52% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full charging time | 1:17 hr | - |
| Battery cycles | 1000 cycles | - |
| Web browsing | 08:46 hr | - |
| Watching video | 12:31 hr | - |
| Gaming | 07:23 hr | - |
| Standby | 175 hr | - |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8160 x 6144 | - |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode | - Bokeh mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 6528 x 4896 | - |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV32D | Omnivision OV32D |
| Sensor size | 1/3.6" (≈ 0.28 inch) | 1/3.6" (≈ 0.28 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.61 micron | 0.61 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Type of SIM card | No | No |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 8.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | - |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | September 2025 | May 2025 |
| Release date | September 2025 | May 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | - |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 67 W | Yes, 120 W |
Further details
Notes on Pad 7 Ultra:
- The Nano Soft screen model is 10g heavier.
- NFC is supported for data transfer only.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the display and battery life are more important to you, then choose the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra. But if the gaming, software, and sound are more of a priority – go for the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 51