Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 vs Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus)
Redmi Pad 2
6 / 128 GB
Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus)
8 / 128 GB
Here we compared two mid-range tablets: the 11-inch Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 (with MediaTek Helio G100 Ultra) that was released on June 5, 2025, against the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus), which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 and came out 1 year and 8 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2
- Comes with 1960 mAh larger battery capacity: 9000 vs 7040 mAh
- Shows 23% longer battery life (31:12 vs 25:25 hours)
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.3)
- More recent OS version: Android 15 versus 13
- Delivers 16% higher peak brightness (528 against 457 nits)
- Has 2 SIM card slots
- 33% higher pixel density (274 vs 206 PPI)
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus)
- Has 33% more RAM: 8GB versus 6GB
- 25% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 908 and 725 points
- Ready for eSIM technology
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| Size | 11 inches | 11 inches |
| Resolution | 1600 x 2560 pixels | 1200 x 1920 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 8:5 |
| PPI | 274 ppi | 206 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max rated brightness | 600 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Touch sampling rate | 360 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83% | 80.9% |
| RGB color space | 92.5% | 94.2% |
| PWM | 14999 Hz | Not detected |
| Response time | 29 ms | 42 ms |
| Contrast | 1421:1 | 1409:1 |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 254.58 mm (10.02 inches) | 257.1 mm (10.12 inches) |
| Width | 166.04 mm (6.54 inches) | 168.7 mm (6.64 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.36 mm (0.29 inches) | 6.9 mm (0.27 inches) |
| Weight | 510 g (17.99 oz) | 480 g (16.93 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray, Green, Purple | Silver, Gray, Blue |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | No |
| Area | 423 cm2 (65.5 inches2) | 434 cm2 (67.2 inches2) |
| Repairability | Average (2.74/5) | Average (2.81/5) |
| Drop resistance | Good (C) Β· 156 drops | - |
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (104th and 124th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (79th and 96th place)
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G100 Ultra | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 |
| Max clock | 2200 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A76 |
- 6 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55) - 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78) |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 6 nanometers | 6 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Hexagon 686 |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | Adreno 619 |
| GPU shading units | 64 | 256 |
| GPU clock | 1000 MHz | 840 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~128 GFLOPS | ~430.1 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 1260 | 1405 |
| Single-core score | 725 | 908 |
| Multi-core score | 1980 | 2072 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 219481 | 245267 |
| GPU | 48406 | 57538 |
| Memory | 146071 | 108723 |
| UX | 156511 | 170923 |
| Total score | 570469 | 582451 |
| Samples | [74 tests] | [14 tests] |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 10522 | 10572 |
| Video editing | 5262 | 4298 |
| Photo editing | 17642 | 22564 |
| Data manipulation | 7941 | 8881 |
| Writing score | 11407 | 13360 |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-12 (Maksik) | AnTuTu 12 | 634343 |
| π 2026-04-24 (Mentos_uzbek) | Battery life | SOT 11:48 / 41:40 |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus)
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 1246 |
| π 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 917 / 1939 |
| π 2026-07-31 (Samsung galaxy tab A9+) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 907 / 2014 |
| π 2026-07-31 (Samsung galaxy tab A9+) | AnTuTu 11 | 582451 |
| π 2026-07-26 (Abolfazl) | AnTuTu 11 | 601154 |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | Up to 2048 GB | Up to 1024 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 13 |
| ROM | HyperOS 2.0 | One UI 5.1 |
| OS size | 24 GB | 22.9 GB |
| OS updates | 0 years | 5 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 9000 mAh | 7040 mAh |
| Max charge power | 18 W | 15 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | - | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (17% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 60 min) |
| Full charging time | 2:59 hr | 2:58 hr |
| Battery cycles | 1000 cycles | 1200 cycles |
| Web browsing | 08:38 hr | 08:57 hr |
| Watching video | 09:17 hr | 11:07 hr |
| Gaming | 06:30 hr | 05:44 hr |
| Standby | 233 hr | 155 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | - |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Slow motion | No | No |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - | - |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | - |
| Sensor | GalaxyCore GC08A3 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/4" (β 0.25 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 5 megapixels | 5 megapixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | - |
| Focal length | 17 mm | - |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/5.0" (β 0.2 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 1 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | - |
| eSIM support* | No | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | - | 18 |
| 5G support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | June 2025 | October 2023 |
| Release date | June 2025 | October 2023 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | $219 |
| Successor | - | - Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ (Plus) |
| Sensors | - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass |
- Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 15 W | Not included |
Further details
Notes on Redmi Pad 2:
- Gyroscope, GPS and compass are only available on the 4G model.
Notes on Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus):
- Doesn't have S Pen support.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 134