AMD Ryzen AI Max+ Pro 395 vs AI 9 HX 370

We compared two laptop CPUs: the 3.0 GHz AMD Ryzen AI Max+ Pro 395 with 16-cores against the 2.0 GHz AI 9 HX 370 with 12-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 370 and 395
Advantages of AMD Ryzen AI Max+ Pro 395
  • Has 40 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming
  • More powerful Radeon 8060S integrated graphics: 14.8 vs 5.9 TFLOPS
  • Supports quad-channel memory
  • Newer - released 7 months later
  • Has 4 more physical cores
Advantages of AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
  • Supports up to 256 GB DDR5-5600 RAM

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Single) - 475
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) - 5200
Cinebench Scores (44th and 103rd place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 2190 MB/sec 1340 MB/sec
Clang compilation 228.7 Klines/sec 139.9 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 513 pages/sec 335.1 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 613 Mpixels/sec 468.2 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 337 pages/sec 322.1 pages/sec
Background blur 69.7 images/sec 63.8 images/sec
Photo processing 233.1 images/sec 124.6 images/sec
Ray tracing 48 Mpixels/sec 33.5 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2] – 3 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 191.3 GOps/sec 122.2 GOps/sec
Floating point math 121.2 GOps/sec 76.4 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 285M Primes/sec 127M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 70.6M Strings/sec 48.3M Strings/sec
Data encryption 33.1 GBytes/sec 22.1 GBytes/sec
Data compression 643.9 MBytes/sec 442.7 MBytes/sec
Physics 3190 Frames/sec 1881 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 52.5B Matrices/sec 31.4B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 353 & 3074 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 14.9 PPW 23 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 191.2 PPW 295.9 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 431.2 PPW 647.4 PPW
Blender / Watt 3.12 PPW 5.21 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ Pro 395
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-15 (etheory)Cinebench 2024113 / 1785
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-26 (Nvdya)Cinebench 2024114 / 1135
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-24 (Peterr)Cinebench 2024117 / 962
πŸ“˜ 2025-03-18 (Rennsport)Geekbench 6 CPU2904 / 15532
πŸ“˜ 2025-03-18 (Asus Tuf FA608WI)Cinebench 2024104 / 1050
πŸ“˜ 2025-03-15 (Urxelix)Cinebench 2024116 / 1217

Specifications

Full technical specification of AMD Ryzen AI Max+ Pro 395 and AI 9 HX 370

General

Vendor Amd Amd
Released January 7, 2025 June 3, 2024
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Zen 5 (Strix Halo) Zen 5 (Strix Point)
Model number - 370
Integrated GPU Radeon 8060S Radeon 890M
Rival Equivalent - Apple M4 Pro (14-Core) - Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Successor - - AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470
AMD Ryzen CPU ranking (13th and 31st place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 16 4
P-Threads 32 8
Base Frequency (P) 3.0 GHz 2.0 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.1 GHz 5.1 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores - 8
E-Threads - 16
Base Frequency (E) - 2.0 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) - 3.3 GHz
Total
Total Cores 16 12
Total Threads 32 24
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 30x 20x
L1 Cache 80K (per core) 80K (per core)
L2 Cache 1MB (per core) 1MB (per core)
L3 Cache 64MB (shared) 24MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No No

Package

Fabrication Process 4 nm 4 nm
TDP (PL1) 45-120 W (configurable) 15-54 W (configurable)
Socket Custom FP8
Peak Temperature 100Β°C 100Β°C
Laptop processors ranking (23rd and 42nd place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Radeon 8060S AMD Radeon 890M
GPU Base Clock 1295 MHz 400 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 2900 MHz 2900 MHz
Shading Units 2560 1024
TMUs 160 64
ROPs 64 32
Execution Units 40 16
TGP 55 W 15 W
iGPU FLOPS
14.8 TFLOPS
5.9 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - LPDDR5X-8000 - DDR5-5600
- LPDDR5X-8000
Max. Memory Size 128 GB 256 GB
Memory Channels 4 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 256 GB/s -
ECC Support Yes No

Misc

Official Site AMD Ryzen AI Max+ Pro 395 official page AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 official page
PCI Express Version 4.0 4.0
PCI Express Lanes 16 16

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
141 (81.5%)
32 (18.5%)
Total votes: 173

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 or AI Max+ Pro 395?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Hery February 28, 2025 at 06:46 AM
it's look like AMD will be Pioneer of AI X86 CPU rather than competitor. always advance every year. But the value still on the equal of average AMD CPU's hopefully.
+17 Reply
Avatar
Mikejones April 23, 2025 at 02:02 PM
nope! MSRP is through the roof. "Absolute power corrupts absolutely" AMD is turning into Intel and we shouldn't support this monopoly.
+15 Reply