Intel Core i5 13600K vs AMD Ryzen 7 9700X

We compared two desktop CPUs: the 3.5 GHz Intel Core i5 13600K with 14-cores against the 3.8 GHz AMD Ryzen 7 9700X with 8-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
The "iGPU" and "Power Efficiency" have a minor impact on the NanoReview Score for desktop CPU.
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Value for money (Beta)

Global average CPU prices are used by default! For better accuracy, enter your current prices and click β€œCalculate".
Currency
VS
29.7
(Mediocre)
Value Index
83.3
(Good)

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 9700X and 13600K
Advantages of Intel Core i5 13600K
  • Has 6 more physical cores
  • More powerful Intel UHD Graphics 770 integrated graphics: 0.8 vs 0.6 TFLOPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 9700X
  • More modern manufacturing process – 4 versus 10 nanometers
  • Newer - released 1 year and 9 months later
  • Has 8 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming
  • 23% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 3331 vs 2718 points
  • 8% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.5 GHz vs 5.1 GHz)

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Single) 492 760
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) 5581 4822
Cinebench Scores (94th and 90th place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
3331
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
17511
File compression 1300 MB/sec 1650 MB/sec
Clang compilation 134.7 Klines/sec 140.9 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 374.2 pages/sec 323.7 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 465.8 Mpixels/sec 501 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 277.2 pages/sec 351.5 pages/sec
Background blur 68.3 images/sec 88.2 images/sec
Photo processing 136 images/sec 127.3 images/sec
Ray tracing 30.1 Mpixels/sec 30.6 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2] – 448 & 4 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
4643
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
37461
Integer math 122 GOps/sec 119.8 GOps/sec
Floating point math 90.2 GOps/sec 78.8 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 153M Primes/sec 190M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 50.8M Strings/sec 46.4M Strings/sec
Data encryption 26.9 GBytes/sec 21.7 GBytes/sec
Data compression 473.1 MBytes/sec 434.5 MBytes/sec
Physics 2245 Frames/sec 2214 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 28.6B Matrices/sec 35.1B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 5100 & 9483 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU
310.15

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 10.3 PPW 20.2 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 128.8 PPW 269.4 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 299.7 PPW 568.6 PPW
Blender / Watt 2.48 PPW 4.63 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core i5 13600K
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-09 (Shinigami)Cinebench 2026492 / 5581
πŸ“˜ 2025-04-29 (DSMJohn)Cinebench 2024118 / 1289
πŸ“˜ 2025-04-20 (io)Cinebench 2024114 / 1206
πŸ“˜ 2025-04-09 (stuchi)Cinebench 2024124 / 1248
πŸ“˜ 2024-09-23 (Fireman12402)Cinebench 2024112 / 1258
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-09 (none)Cinebench 2026705 / 4273
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-24 (NDHK)Cinebench 2026712 / 4879
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-28 (Curry)Cinebench 2024137 / 1147
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-26 (Worldbreaker76)Cinebench 2026779 / 5648
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-26 (Worldbreaker76)Cinebench 2024136 / 1323

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core i5 13600K and AMD Ryzen 7 9700X

General

Vendor Intel Amd
Released September 27, 2022 June 3, 2024
Type Desktop Desktop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Raptor Lake Zen 5 (Granite Ridge)
Model number i5-13600K -
Integrated GPU UHD Graphics 770 Radeon 610M
Rival Equivalent - AMD Ryzen 5 7600X - Intel Core i7 14700K
Successor - Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus -
Intel CPU rating (#60th place)
AMD Ryzen CPU ranking (#17th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 6 8
P-Threads 12 16
Base Frequency (P) 3.5 GHz 3.8 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.1 GHz 5.5 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 8 -
E-Threads 8 -
Base Frequency (E) 2.6 GHz -
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 3.9 GHz -
Total
Total Cores 14 8
Total Threads 20 16
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 35x 38x
L1 Cache 80K (per core) 80K (per core)
L2 Cache 2MB (per core) 1MB (per core)
L3 Cache 24MB (shared) 32MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier Yes Yes

Package

Fabrication Process 10 nm 4 nm
TDP (PL1) 125 W 65 W
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 181 W 142 W
Socket LGA-1700 AM5
Peak Temperature 100Β°C 95Β°C
Die Size - 70.6 mmΒ²
Desktop CPU ranking (61st and 34th place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 770 Radeon 610M
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 400 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 1500 MHz 2200 MHz
Shading Units 256 128
TMUs 16 8
ROPs 8 4
Execution Units 32 2
TGP 15 W 15 W
iGPU FLOPS
0.8 TFLOPS
0.6 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - DDR5-5600
- DDR4-3200
- DDR5-5600
Max. Memory Size 192 GB 192 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 89.6 GB/s 89.6 GB/s
ECC Support Yes Yes

Misc

Official Site Intel Core i5 13600K official page AMD Ryzen 7 9700X official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 5.0
PCI Express Lanes 20 28

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
22 (47.8%)
24 (52.2%)
Total votes: 46

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen 7 9700X or Intel Core i5 13600K?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
BDπŸ‡§πŸ‡© September 24, 2026 at 02:27 PM
13600k winner for ram compatibility
0 Reply