AMD Radeon 610M vs Intel UHD Graphics 770

We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Radeon 610M with 2 pipelines and 128 shaders against the 11 months older Intel UHD Graphics 770 that utilizes 32 pipelines and 256 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of UHD Graphics 770 over Radeon 610M
Reasons to consider the Radeon 610M
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 6 nm process technology
  • Ray-tracing support with 2 dedicated RT cores
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 770
  • Performs better (up to 34%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • 33% higher maximum theoretical performance (0.8 vs 0.6 TFLOPS)
  • Achieves 61% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (8K vs 5K)
  • Has 2x more shading units (256 vs 128)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
11
-
-
-
16
-
-
-
The Witcher 3 -
-
-
-
-
Counter-Strike 2
16
11
-
-
14
10
-
-
Far Cry 6
9
-
-
-
10
-
-
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
13
11
9
-
-
-
-
-
Ghost of Tsushima
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
-
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 9 9
1080p Ultra - -
1440p Ultra - -
4K Ultra - -
Margin of Error Low Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 519 809
Solar Bay 2068 -
Port Royal 291 -
Fire Strike 1745 2899
Wild Life Extreme 998 1960
Night Raid 7335 11888
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
8223
Background Blur 12 img/sec 17.9 img/sec
Face Detection 6.42 img/sec 11.6 img/sec
Horizon Detection 0.16 Gpixels/sec 0.32 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 0.23 Gpixels/sec 0.51 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 0.16 Gpixels/sec 0.31 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.1 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 18.2 Gpixels/sec 20.2 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 828.6 FPS 1156.4 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark 535 551
DirectX 11 17 FPS 11 FPS
DirectX 12 7 FPS 9 FPS
GPU Compute 768 Ops/s 816 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6] – 194 & 13496 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
47.48
118.45
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 47 & 2 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Radeon 610M
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-05-05 (StarSophia)Steel Nomad Light614
Intel UHD Graphics 770
No benchmark results yet

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 660 -
Image Segmentation (HP) 627 -
Image Super Resolution (Q) 2053 -
Face Detection (HP) 2153 -
Pose Estimation (Q) 5787 -
Text Classification (SP) 713 -
Machine Translation (HP) 1114 -
Object Detection (SP) 709 -
Depth Estimation (Q) 3233 -
Style Transfer (SP) 11091 -
Framework ONNX -
Backend DirectML -
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon 610M and Intel UHD Graphics 770

General

Vendor Amd Intel
Build Integrated Integrated
Released October 1, 2022 November 4, 2021
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Generic
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture RDNA 2.0 Generation 12.2
GPU Codename Mendocino Alder Lake GT1
Recommended CPU - AMD Ryzen 5 7520U or above - Intel Core i5 12500 or above
Used in CPUs - AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX
- AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
- AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX
- AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
- AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
- AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
- AMD Ryzen 7 9700X
- AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
- and 6 more
- Intel Core i7 14700HX
- Intel Core i7 14650HX
- Intel Core i5 14500HX
- Intel Core i9 14900KS
- Intel Core i9 14900
- Intel Core i7 14700
- Intel Core i5 14600
- Intel Core i5 14500
- and 24 more
Laptop GPU ranking (126th and 136th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 400 MHz 300 MHz
Boost Clock 1900-2200 MHz (configurable) 1350-1650 MHz (configurable)
Shading Units 128 256
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 8 16
Render Output Units (ROPs) 4 8
Compute Units (Pipelines) 2 32
Tensor Cores - No
Ray-tracing Cores 2 No
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster -
L2 Cache 2MB shared -
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 8-9 GPixel/s 11-13 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 15-18 GTexel/s 22-26 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
0.5-0.6 TFLOPS
0.7-0.8 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 Ring Bus
TGP 15 W 15 W
Manufacturing TSMC Intel
Fabrication Process 6 nm 10 nm
Die Size 122 mm² -
Transistor Count 3.4 billion -
Transistor Density 27.87 MTr/mm² -
Max. Temperature - 100°C

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
ECC No -

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.0 3.0
Ray Tracing Yes No
DLSS No No
DisplayPort - 1.4a

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
7 (53.8%)
6 (46.2%)
Total votes: 13

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!