Intel Core i5 8600K vs i5 12400F

We compared two 6-core desktop CPUs: the 3.6 GHz Intel Core i5 8600K against the 2.5 GHz i5 12400F. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
The "iGPU" and "Power Efficiency" have a minor impact on the NanoReview Score for desktop CPU.
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
๐Ÿ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Value for money (Beta)

Global average CPU prices are used by default! For better accuracy, enter your current prices and click โ€œCalculate".
Currency
VS
44.7
(Average)
Value Index
66.9
(Good)

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 12400F and 8600K
Advantages of Intel Core i5 8600K
  • Unlocked multiplier
  • Includes an integrated GPU Intel UHD Graphics 630
Advantages of Intel Core i5 12400F
  • Has 9 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming
  • Newer - released 4 years and 3 months later
  • Around 34.2 GB/s (80%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
  • Newer PCI Express version โ€“ 5.0
  • More modern manufacturing process โ€“ 10 versus 14 nanometers
  • 43% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 2300 vs 1605 points
  • 2% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4.4 GHz vs 4.3 GHz)

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2300
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
9477
File compression 473.5 MB/sec 789 MB/sec
Clang compilation 40.5 Klines/sec 69.9 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 144.1 pages/sec 221 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 191 Mpixels/sec 263.7 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 156.7 pages/sec 230 pages/sec
Background blur 39.9 images/sec 49.5 images/sec
Photo processing 62.7 images/sec 77.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 7.6 Mpixels/sec 16.2 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2] โ€“ 1138 & 1128 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
3486
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
19551
Integer math 27.7 GOps/sec 60.1 GOps/sec
Floating point math 23.8 GOps/sec 46.9 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 42M Primes/sec 74M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 17.2M Strings/sec 23.2M Strings/sec
Data encryption 3.1 GBytes/sec 11.7 GBytes/sec
Data compression 140.7 MBytes/sec 233.1 MBytes/sec
Physics 722 Frames/sec 1257 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 12.5B Matrices/sec 15.9B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] โ€“ 3889 & 17200 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU
161.36

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 3.6 PPW 9.8 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 64.4 PPW 145.8 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 106.8 PPW 300.8 PPW
Blender / Watt 0.95 PPW 2.48 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core i5 8600K
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2025-03-16 (london)Cinebench 202463 / 342
Intel Core i5 12400F
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-01-24 (Ecstatify)Geekbench 6 CPU2918 / 13277
๐Ÿ“˜ 2025-08-17 (Olini)Cinebench 2024101 / 664
๐Ÿ“˜ 2025-07-21 (Rolling Manatee)Cinebench 202495 / 640
๐Ÿ“˜ 2025-05-12 (inoklike)Cinebench 202493 / 646
๐Ÿ“˜ 2025-03-04 (RD)Cinebench 202488 / 620

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core i5 8600K and i5 12400F

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Released October 5, 2017 January 4, 2022
Type Desktop Desktop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Coffee Lake Alder Lake
Model number i5-8600K i5-12400F
Integrated GPU UHD Graphics 630 No
Rival Equivalent - AMD Ryzen 5 2600X -
Successor - Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus - Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
Intel CPU rating (#163rd place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 6 6
P-Threads 6 12
Base Frequency (P) 3.6 GHz 2.5 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 4.3 GHz 4.4 GHz
Total
Total Cores 6 6
Total Threads 6 12
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 36x 25x
Bus Bandwidth 8 GT/s -
L1 Cache 64K (per core) 80K (per core)
L2 Cache 256K (per core) 1280K (per core)
L3 Cache 9MB (shared) 18MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier Yes No

Package

Fabrication Process 14 nm 10 nm
TDP (PL1) 95 W 65 W
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) - 117 W
Socket LGA-1151 LGA-1700
Peak Temperature 100ยฐC 100ยฐC
Desktop CPU ranking (164th and 108th place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 630 -
GPU Base Clock 350 MHz -
GPU Boost Clock 1150 MHz -
Shading Units 192 -
TMUs 24 -
ROPs 3 -
Execution Units 24 -
TGP 15 W -
iGPU FLOPS
0.4 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - DDR4-2666 - DDR5-4800
- DDR4-3200
Max. Memory Size 128 GB 128 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 42.6 GB/s 76.8 GB/s
ECC Support No No

Misc

Official Site Intel Core i5 8600K official page Intel Core i5 12400F official page
PCI Express Version 3.0 5.0
PCI Express Lanes 16 20

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
1 (12.5%)
7 (87.5%)
Total votes: 8

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: Intel Core i5 12400F or i5 8600K?
๐ŸŒ Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!