Intel Core i9 12900H vs Apple M4 (10-Core)

We compared two laptop CPUs: the 2.5 GHz Intel Core i9 12900H with 14-cores against the 4.46 GHz Apple M4 (10-Core) with 10-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Key Differences

What are the key differences between (10-Core) and 12900H
Advantages of Intel Core i9 12900H
  • Supports up to 64 GB DDR5-4800 RAM
  • Has 4 more physical cores
Advantages of Apple M4 (10-Core)
  • More modern manufacturing process – 3 versus 10 nanometers
  • Newer - released 2 years and 4 months later
  • More powerful Apple M4 GPU (10-core) integrated graphics: 3.8 vs 2.2 TFLOPS
  • 58% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 3777 vs 2397 points

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) - 3211
Cinebench Scores (157th and 158th place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
3777
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
14818
File compression 898.1 MB/sec 1500 MB/sec
Clang compilation 97.6 Klines/sec 120.2 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 270 pages/sec 329.3 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 325.3 Mpixels/sec 362.1 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 248.3 pages/sec 352.1 pages/sec
Background blur 52.7 images/sec 69.8 images/sec
Photo processing 94.2 images/sec 114.4 images/sec
Ray tracing 23.8 Mpixels/sec 18.1 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2] – 626 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
4499
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
26596
23603
Integer math 91.3 GOps/sec 54.2 GOps/sec
Floating point math 66 GOps/sec 49.6 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 104M Primes/sec 263M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 34.4M Strings/sec 34.3M Strings/sec
Data encryption 18 GBytes/sec 15.1 GBytes/sec
Data compression 308.2 MBytes/sec 280.5 MBytes/sec
Physics 1700 Frames/sec 2527 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 18.4B Matrices/sec 13.6B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 3998 & 2752 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU
229.85

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 21.9 PPW 40.9 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 265.9 PPW 617.4 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 591 PPW 983.5 PPW
Blender / Watt 4.67 PPW 9.58 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core i9 12900H
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-21 (Robert L)Cinebench 2024104 / 765
πŸ“˜ 2025-05-02 (Toksik Vegeta)Cinebench 2024107 / 984
Apple M4 (10-Core)
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-13 (doannguuyenmfs)Geekbench 6 CPU3703 / 15450
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-18 (Avacada)Geekbench 6 CPU3906 / 15577
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-05 (Dovlet)Geekbench 6 CPU3916 / 15202
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-31 (gmamorim)Geekbench 6 CPU3730 / 15258
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-28 (LC)Cinebench 2024174 / 993

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core i9 12900H and Apple M4 (10-Core)

General

Vendor Intel Apple
Released January 4, 2022 May 7, 2024
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set x86-64 ARMv9
Codename Alder Lake Apple M4
Model number i9-12900H APL1206
Integrated GPU Iris Xe Graphics (96EU) Apple M4 GPU (10-core)
Rival Equivalent - AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS - Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite (X1E-84-100)
Successor - Intel Core Ultra 9 288V - Apple M5 (10-Core)
Intel CPU rating (#115th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 6 4
P-Threads 12 4
Base Frequency (P) 2.5 GHz 4.46 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5 GHz -
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 8 6
E-Threads 8 6
Base Frequency (E) 1.8 GHz 2.89 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 3.8 GHz -
Total
Total Cores 14 10
Total Threads 20 10
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 25x 44x
L1 Cache 80K (per core) 192K (per core)
L2 Cache 1280K (per core) 16MB (shared)
L3 Cache 24MB (shared) -
Unlocked Multiplier No No

Package

Transistors - 28 billions
Fabrication Process 10 nm 3 nm
TDP (PL1) 35-45 W (configurable) 24 W
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 115 W -
Socket BGA-1744 Apple M-Socket
Peak Temperature 100Β°C 100Β°C
Die Size - 169.4 mmΒ²
Laptop processors ranking (152nd and 28th place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Intel Iris Xe Graphics (96EU) Apple M4 GPU (10-core)
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 500 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 1450 MHz 1470 MHz
Shading Units 768 1280
TMUs 48 80
ROPs 24 40
Execution Units 96 160
TGP 15 W 18 W
iGPU FLOPS
2.2 TFLOPS
3.8 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - DDR5-4800
- DDR4-3200
- LPDDR5-5200
- LPDDR4x-4267
- LPDDR5X-7500
Max. Memory Size 64 GB 32 GB
Memory Channels 2 8
Max. Memory Bandwidth - 120 GB/s
ECC Support No No

Misc

Official Site Intel Core i9 12900H official page -
PCI Express Version 4.0 -
PCI Express Lanes 28 -
Further details
Notes on M4 (10-Core):
    - SoC is designed using ARMv9.4-A architecture.

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
15 (12.8%)
102 (87.2%)
Total votes: 117

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: Apple M4 (10-Core) or Intel Core i9 12900H?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Md Mostafizur Rahman April 8, 2026 at 02:32 AM
I bought Mac Mini M4 last week. I'm quite impressed.
0 Reply
Avatar
JBs May 7, 2025 at 12:38 AM
Apple makes computers. They don't have to run on Windows. Perhaps an exchange of common file suffixes and connections to achieve a unified, steady, and stable format would benefit the consumer, hopefully producing better, standardized products, allowing manufacturers to innovate instead of competing. With an integrated approach, soon we'll see great advances and ideas. Good luck, everyone.
0 Reply
Avatar
agahan berdiyev July 24, 2024 at 01:11 AM
The better one is Kirin, which is Huawei.
+2 Reply
Avatar
sarah May 9, 2024 at 09:14 AM
M4 much better. Low energy consumption , high performance
+2 Reply