Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus vs i5 14600K

We compared two desktop CPUs: the 4.2 GHz Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus with 18-cores against the 3.5 GHz i5 14600K with 14-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
The "iGPU" and "Power Efficiency" have a minor impact on the NanoReview Score for desktop CPU.
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
๐Ÿ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Value for money (Beta)

Global average CPU prices are used by default! For better accuracy, enter your current prices and click โ€œCalculate".
Currency
VS
169.6
(Excellent)
Value Index
74.8
(Good)

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 14600K and Plus
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus
  • Newer - released 2 years and 5 months later
  • More modern manufacturing process โ€“ 3 versus 10 nanometers
  • More powerful Intel Arc iGPU (4-Cores) integrated graphics: 1.9 vs 0.8 TFLOPS
  • Has 4 more physical cores
  • Has 6 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming
  • Supports up to 256 GB DDR5-7200 RAM
  • Around 25.6 GB/s (29%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
  • 15% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 3225 vs 2804 points

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Single) 575 628
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) 7413 4994
Cinebench Scores (39th and 100th place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 1600 MB/sec 1500 MB/sec
Clang compilation 211.6 Klines/sec 140.5 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 485.7 pages/sec 429.5 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 588 Mpixels/sec 507.8 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 400 pages/sec 288.4 pages/sec
Background blur 95.2 images/sec 74 images/sec
Photo processing 170.8 images/sec 154.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 39.7 Mpixels/sec 31.5 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1] โ€“ 786 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 125.4 GOps/sec 125.6 GOps/sec
Floating point math 163.3 GOps/sec 92.7 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 487M Primes/sec 157M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 69.3M Strings/sec 52.1M Strings/sec
Data encryption 42.2 GBytes/sec 27.5 GBytes/sec
Data compression 570.1 MBytes/sec 480.7 MBytes/sec
Physics 3481 Frames/sec 2371 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 44.7B Matrices/sec 28.4B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] โ€“ 254 & 4251 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 14.8 PPW 10.2 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 171.2 PPW 127.6 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 413.9 PPW 307.3 PPW
Blender / Watt 3.68 PPW 2.44 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-05-20 (sparehobos)Cinebench 2024150 / 2004
Intel Core i5 14600K
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-07-25 (zgabbySims)Cinebench 2026628 / 4994
๐Ÿ“˜ 2025-11-14 (Batela)Cinebench 2024122 / 1386
๐Ÿ“˜ 2025-10-01 (Tom)Cinebench 2024119 / 1278
๐Ÿ“˜ 2025-10-01 (Tom B)Cinebench 2024117 / 882
๐Ÿ“˜ 2025-07-11 (GAMERZ)Cinebench 2024118 / 1273

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus and i5 14600K

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Released March 12, 2026 October 16, 2023
Type Desktop Desktop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Arrow Lake Raptor Lake Refresh
Model number 250K+ i5-14600K
Integrated GPU Arc iGPU (4-Cores) UHD Graphics 770
Rival Equivalent - AMD Ryzen 5 9600X - AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
Successor - - Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus
Intel CPU rating (11th and 51st place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 6 6
P-Threads 6 12
Base Frequency (P) 4.2 GHz 3.5 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.3 GHz 5.3 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 12 8
E-Threads 12 8
Base Frequency (E) 3.3 GHz 2.6 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 4.6 GHz 4 GHz
Total
Total Cores 18 14
Total Threads 18 20
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 42x 35x
L1 Cache 192K (per core) 80K (per core)
L2 Cache 3MB (per core) 2MB (per core)
L3 Cache 30MB (shared) 24MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier Yes Yes

Package

Transistors 17.8 billions -
Fabrication Process 3 nm 10 nm
TDP (PL1) 125 W 125 W
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 159 W 181 W
Socket FCLGA-1851 LGA-1700
Peak Temperature 105ยฐC 100ยฐC
Desktop CPU ranking (19th and 52nd place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Intel Arc iGPU (4-Cores) Intel UHD Graphics 770
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 300 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 1900 MHz 1550 MHz
Shading Units 512 256
TMUs 32 16
ROPs 16 8
Execution Units 64 32
TGP 14 W 15 W
iGPU FLOPS
1.9 TFLOPS
0.8 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - DDR5-7200 - DDR5-5600
- DDR4-3200
Max. Memory Size 256 GB 192 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 115.2 GB/s 89.6 GB/s
ECC Support Yes Yes

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus official page Intel Core i5 14600K official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 5.0
PCI Express Lanes 24 20

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
17 (89.5%)
2 (10.5%)
Total votes: 19

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: Intel Core i5 14600K or Ultra 5 250K Plus?
๐ŸŒ Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!