Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs i7 13700

We compared two desktop CPUs: the 2.4 GHz Intel Core Ultra 7 265 with 20-cores against the 2.1 GHz i7 13700 with 16-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
The "iGPU" and "Power Efficiency" have a minor impact on the NanoReview Score for desktop CPU.
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
๐Ÿ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Value for money (Beta)

Global average CPU prices are used by default! For better accuracy, enter your current prices and click โ€œCalculate".
Currency
VS
68.9
(Good)
Value Index
26.5
(Mediocre)

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 13700 and 265
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 7 265
  • More modern manufacturing process โ€“ 3 versus 10 nanometers
  • Newer - released 2 years later
  • Has 4 more physical cores
  • Supports up to 256 GB DDR5-6400 RAM
  • 4% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.3 GHz vs 5.1 GHz)

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench Scores (82nd and 149th place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
18843
File compression 1340 MB/sec 1250 MB/sec
Clang compilation 189 Klines/sec 147.2 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 378.8 pages/sec 360.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 525.9 Mpixels/sec 466.6 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 326.6 pages/sec 285.4 pages/sec
Background blur 78.5 images/sec 66.7 images/sec
Photo processing 138.5 images/sec 122.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 41.5 Mpixels/sec 34.1 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2] โ€“ 1031 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
49668
Integer math 134.7 GOps/sec 136.7 GOps/sec
Floating point math 172.7 GOps/sec 96.1 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 419M Primes/sec 144M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 63.8M Strings/sec 46M Strings/sec
Data encryption 40.4 GBytes/sec 25.2 GBytes/sec
Data compression 522.8 MBytes/sec 436.6 MBytes/sec
Physics 2920 Frames/sec 2017 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 41.5B Matrices/sec 26.1B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] โ€“ 2008 & 2714 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU
352.92

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 21.5 PPW 15.6 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 289.9 PPW 251.1 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 764.1 PPW 551.8 PPW
Blender / Watt 5.22 PPW 5.43 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2025-12-18 (supertimm)Cinebench 2024117 / 1831
Intel Core i7 13700
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2025-11-06 (Bughunter47)Cinebench 2024121 / 1237
๐Ÿ“˜ 2025-08-12 (Elektronyx97)Geekbench 6 CPU2772 / 18553
๐Ÿ“˜ 2025-08-12 (Elektronyx97)Cinebench 2024117 / 1581
๐Ÿ“˜ 2024-10-04 (mr b)Cinebench 2024116 / 967
๐Ÿ“˜ 2023-12-07 (Akirafjz)Cinebench 2024119 / 1014

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and i7 13700

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Released December 18, 2024 January 3, 2023
Type Desktop Desktop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Arrow Lake Raptor Lake
Model number 265 i7-13700
Integrated GPU Arc Graphics UHD Graphics 770
Rival Equivalent - - AMD Ryzen 7 7700
Successor - - Intel Core Ultra 7 265
Intel CPU rating (23rd and 59th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 8 8
P-Threads 8 16
Base Frequency (P) 2.4 GHz 2.1 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.3 GHz 5.1 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 12 8
E-Threads 12 8
Base Frequency (E) 1.8 GHz 1.5 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 4.6 GHz 4.1 GHz
Total
Total Cores 20 16
Total Threads 20 24
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 24x 21x
L1 Cache 192K (per core) 80K (per core)
L2 Cache 3MB (per core) 2MB (per core)
L3 Cache 30MB (shared) 30MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No No

Package

Fabrication Process 3 nm 10 nm
TDP (PL1) 65 W 65 W
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 182 W 219 W
Socket FCLGA-1851 LGA-1700
Peak Temperature 105ยฐC 100ยฐC
Desktop CPU ranking (32nd and 60th place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Intel Arc Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 770
GPU Base Clock - 300 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 1950 MHz 1600 MHz
Shading Units - 256
TMUs - 16
ROPs - 8
Execution Units - 32
TGP - 15 W
iGPU FLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - DDR5-6400 - DDR5-5600
- DDR4-3200
Max. Memory Size 256 GB 192 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth - 89.6 GB/s
ECC Support Yes Yes

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra 7 265 official page Intel Core i7 13700 official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 5.0
PCI Express Lanes 24 20

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
1 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: 1

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: Intel Core i7 13700 or Ultra 7 265?
๐ŸŒ Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!