Intel Core i7 13700K vs i7 13700

We compared two 16-core desktop CPUs: the 3.4 GHz Intel Core i7 13700K against the 2.1 GHz i7 13700. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
The "iGPU" and "Power Efficiency" have a minor impact on the NanoReview Score for desktop CPU.
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Value for money (Beta)

Global average CPU prices are used by default! For better accuracy, enter your current prices and click β€œCalculate".
Currency
VS
37.3
(Mediocre)
Value Index
26.5
(Mediocre)

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 13700 and 13700K
Advantages of Intel Core i7 13700K
  • Unlocked multiplier
  • 4% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.3 GHz vs 5.1 GHz)

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
1521
Cinebench 2026 (Single) 659 -
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) 6859 -
Cinebench Scores (66th and 149th place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
20193
File compression 1770 MB/sec 1250 MB/sec
Clang compilation 167.5 Klines/sec 147.2 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 528.1 pages/sec 360.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 560.2 Mpixels/sec 466.6 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 288 pages/sec 285.4 pages/sec
Background blur 81 images/sec 66.7 images/sec
Photo processing 187.6 images/sec 122.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 37.6 Mpixels/sec 34.1 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2] – 817 & 1031 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
45614
Integer math 153.8 GOps/sec 136.7 GOps/sec
Floating point math 114.4 GOps/sec 96.1 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 188M Primes/sec 144M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 62.5M Strings/sec 46M Strings/sec
Data encryption 33.1 GBytes/sec 25.2 GBytes/sec
Data compression 591.4 MBytes/sec 436.6 MBytes/sec
Physics 2692 Frames/sec 2017 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 36.4B Matrices/sec 26.1B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 8277 & 2714 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU
401.93
352.92

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 12.2 PPW 15.6 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 161.5 PPW 251.1 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 364.9 PPW 551.8 PPW
Blender / Watt 3.22 PPW 5.43 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core i7 13700K
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-30 (Channel3)Cinebench 2026659 / 6859
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-14 (Xypher)Cinebench 2024121 / 1618
πŸ“˜ 2025-05-28 (Illyctro)Geekbench 6 CPU2671 / 17244
πŸ“˜ 2025-05-27 (JMoor)Cinebench 2024120 / 1543
πŸ“˜ 2025-05-21 (Sighrus)Cinebench 2024126 / 1759
Intel Core i7 13700
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-06 (Bughunter47)Cinebench 2024121 / 1237
πŸ“˜ 2025-08-12 (Elektronyx97)Geekbench 6 CPU2772 / 18553
πŸ“˜ 2025-08-12 (Elektronyx97)Cinebench 2024117 / 1581
πŸ“˜ 2024-10-04 (mr b)Cinebench 2024116 / 967
πŸ“˜ 2023-12-07 (Akirafjz)Cinebench 2024119 / 1014

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core i7 13700K and i7 13700

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Released September 27, 2022 January 3, 2023
Type Desktop Desktop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Raptor Lake Raptor Lake
Model number i7-13700K i7-13700
Integrated GPU UHD Graphics 770 UHD Graphics 770
Rival Equivalent - AMD Ryzen 7 7700X - AMD Ryzen 7 7700
Successor - Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus - Intel Core Ultra 7 265
Intel CPU rating (31st and 59th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 8 8
P-Threads 16 16
Base Frequency (P) 3.4 GHz 2.1 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.3 GHz 5.1 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 8 8
E-Threads 8 8
Base Frequency (E) 2.5 GHz 1.5 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 4.2 GHz 4.1 GHz
Total
Total Cores 16 16
Total Threads 24 24
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 34x 21x
L1 Cache 80K (per core) 80K (per core)
L2 Cache 2MB (per core) 2MB (per core)
L3 Cache 30MB (shared) 30MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier Yes No

Package

Fabrication Process 10 nm 10 nm
TDP (PL1) 125 W 65 W
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 253 W 219 W
Socket LGA-1700 LGA-1700
Peak Temperature 100Β°C 100Β°C
Desktop CPU ranking (40th and 60th place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 770 Intel UHD Graphics 770
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 300 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 1600 MHz 1600 MHz
Shading Units 256 256
TMUs 16 16
ROPs 8 8
Execution Units 32 32
TGP 15 W 15 W
iGPU FLOPS
0.8 TFLOPS
0.8 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - DDR5-5600
- DDR4-3200
- DDR5-5600
- DDR4-3200
Max. Memory Size 192 GB 192 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 89.6 GB/s 89.6 GB/s
ECC Support Yes Yes

Misc

Official Site Intel Core i7 13700K official page Intel Core i7 13700 official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 5.0
PCI Express Lanes 20 20

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
133 (31.8%)
285 (68.2%)
Total votes: 418

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: Intel Core i7 13700 or i7 13700K?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Ean February 18, 2023 at 08:55 PM
Will the slight reduction in performance in the 13700 help with the issues a lot of people be having with the 13700k running hot?
+43 Reply
Avatar
Yavor June 8, 2023 at 03:35 PM
If you are not overclocking, it will certainly ease up the cooling requirements as it draws much less wattage. That being said, modern CPUs are very efficient at running themselves up to TJmax (100Β°C) to extract every bit of performance, and since most high-end motherboards, especially the Z790s, will allow you to pump wattage into the CPU, which will pretty much cancel this statement. So, if you just want a quiet and cool system with minimal loss of performance - go with the non-K version. If you have decent cooling and care more about performance (even on Auto OC) - go with the K version.
+73 Reply