AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Ryzen 7 9800X3D

We compared two desktop CPUs: the 4.2 GHz AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D with 16-cores against the 4.7 GHz Ryzen 7 9800X3D with 8-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
The "iGPU" and "Power Efficiency" have a minor impact on the NanoReview Score for desktop CPU.
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Value for money (Beta)

Global average CPU prices are used by default! For better accuracy, enter your current prices and click β€œCalculate".
Currency
VS
27.0
(Mediocre)
Value Index
50.2
(Average)

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 9800X3D and 7950X3D
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
  • Has 8 more physical cores
  • Unlocked multiplier
  • Has 32 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming
  • 10% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.7 GHz vs 5.2 GHz)
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
  • Newer - released 1 year and 10 months later
  • More modern manufacturing process – 4 versus 5 nanometers
  • More than 6Β° C higher critical temperature
  • Around 6.4 GB/s (8%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
  • 10% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 3315 vs 3003 points

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Single) - 708
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) - 5087
Cinebench Scores (26th and 87th place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 1550 MB/sec 1730 MB/sec
Clang compilation 228.7 Klines/sec 140.3 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 353.4 pages/sec 356.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 482.7 Mpixels/sec 509 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 303.7 pages/sec 337 pages/sec
Background blur 68.3 images/sec 90.4 images/sec
Photo processing 117.9 images/sec 135.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 54.7 Mpixels/sec 29.1 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2] – 562 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
62301
Integer math 213.3 GOps/sec 116.6 GOps/sec
Floating point math 130.1 GOps/sec 79.4 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 492M Primes/sec 420M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 93.2M Strings/sec 48.4M Strings/sec
Data encryption 47 GBytes/sec 22.1 GBytes/sec
Data compression 783.2 MBytes/sec 467.2 MBytes/sec
Physics 5047 Frames/sec 4071 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 58.4B Matrices/sec 38.7B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 6573 & 25509 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU
539.45

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 16.7 PPW 11.1 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 158.7 PPW 152.9 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 519.2 PPW 332.7 PPW
Blender / Watt 4.5 PPW 2.68 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-03 (TheDude)Cinebench 2024109 / 1803
πŸ“˜ 2025-08-23 (HermesGrey)GeekBench2723 / 17081
πŸ“˜ 2025-06-28 (JenXay)Cinebench 2024117 / 2062
πŸ“˜ 2025-06-08 (Jacob Newman)Cinebench 2024113 / 1958
πŸ“˜ 2025-02-19 (Ph1ps)Cinebench 2024111 / 2735
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-28 (Average)Cinebench 2026735 / 5624
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (looch)Cinebench 2026708 / 5087
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-20 (szegi)Cinebench 2024138 / 1365
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-08 (Spice Master)Cinebench 2026764 / 5801
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-08 (ChronicallyEve)Cinebench 2026721 / 5465

Specifications

Full technical specification of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Ryzen 7 9800X3D

General

Vendor Amd Amd
Released January 4, 2023 October 31, 2024
Type Desktop Desktop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Zen 4 (Raphael) Zen 5 (Granite Ridge)
Model number 7950X3D 9800X3D
Integrated GPU Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) Radeon Graphics
Rival Equivalent - Intel Core i9 13900K -
Successor - AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D -
AMD Ryzen CPU ranking (12th and 14th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 16 8
P-Threads 32 16
Base Frequency (P) 4.2 GHz 4.7 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.7 GHz 5.2 GHz
Total
Total Cores 16 8
Total Threads 32 16
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 42x 47x
L1 Cache 64K (per core) 80K (per core)
L2 Cache 1MB (per core) 1MB (per core)
L3 Cache 128MB (shared) 96MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier Yes No

Package

Transistors 13.1 billions -
Fabrication Process 5 nm 4 nm
TDP (PL1) 120 W 120 W
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 162 W 162 W
Socket AM5 AM5
Peak Temperature 89Β°C 95Β°C
Desktop CPU ranking (23rd and 27th place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) Radeon Graphics
GPU Base Clock 400 MHz 400 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 2200 MHz 2200 MHz
Shading Units 128 128
TMUs 8 8
ROPs 4 4
Execution Units 2 2
TGP 15 W 15 W
iGPU FLOPS
0.6 TFLOPS
0.6 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - DDR5-5200 - DDR5-5600
Max. Memory Size 192 GB 192 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 83.2 GB/s 89.6 GB/s
ECC Support Yes Yes

Misc

Official Site AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D official page AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 5.0
PCI Express Lanes 28 28

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
102 (76.1%)
32 (23.9%)
Total votes: 134

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D or Ryzen 9 7950X3D?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!