Intel Core Ultra 7 366H vs Ultra 7 270K Plus

We compared two CPUs: the 2.0 GHz Intel Core Ultra 7 366H (laptop) with 16-cores against the 3.7 GHz Ultra 7 270K Plus (desktop) with 24-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
The "iGPU" and "Power Efficiency" have a minor impact on the NanoReview Score for desktop CPU.
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
🔌 Usage Scenario:

Value for money (Beta)

Global average CPU prices are used by default! For better accuracy, enter your current prices and click “Calculate".
Currency
VS

Key Differences

What are the key differences between Plus and 366H
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 7 366H
  • More modern manufacturing process – 2 versus 3 nanometers
  • More powerful Intel Xe3 Graphics (4-Core) integrated graphics: 2.6 vs 2 TFLOPS
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
  • Has 18 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming
  • Unlocked multiplier
  • Supports up to 256 GB DDR5-7200 RAM
  • Has 8 more physical cores
  • 31% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 3750 vs 2858 points
  • 13% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.4 GHz vs 4.8 GHz)

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Single) - 595
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) - 9722
Cinebench Scores (116th and 3rd place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 1330 MB/sec 2000 MB/sec
Clang compilation 122.4 Klines/sec 297.3 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 435.8 pages/sec 635.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 507.4 Mpixels/sec 716 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 285.5 pages/sec 447.5 pages/sec
Background blur 70.7 images/sec 116 images/sec
Photo processing 174.4 images/sec 210.5 images/sec
Ray tracing 26.9 Mpixels/sec 59 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2]

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 83.9 GOps/sec 175.8 GOps/sec
Floating point math 104 GOps/sec 229.2 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 328M Primes/sec 612M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 40.3M Strings/sec 96.8M Strings/sec
Data encryption 26.1 GBytes/sec 59 GBytes/sec
Data compression 331.2 MBytes/sec 803 MBytes/sec
Physics 2892 Frames/sec 4038 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 27.3B Matrices/sec 63.4B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4]270 & 1837 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 46.3 PPW 19.9 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 661.3 PPW 219.2 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 1348 PPW 547.7 PPW
Blender / Watt 7.94 PPW 4.92 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core Ultra 7 366H
No benchmark results yet
Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-08-12 (coolguy)Cinebench 20260 / 8872
📘 2026-06-25 (Adnan)Cinebench 2024144 / 2490
📘 2026-06-13 (sparehobos)Cinebench 2024147 / 2614
📘 2026-04-11 (Daniel Comeau)Cinebench 2026568 / 8929
📘 2026-04-07 (IdiotStick)Cinebench 2026595 / 9722

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 7 366H and Ultra 7 270K Plus

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Released January 5, 2026 March 12, 2026
Type Laptop Desktop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Panther Lake Arrow Lake
Model number 366H 270K+
Integrated GPU Xe3 Graphics (4-Core) Arc iGPU (4-Cores)
Rival Equivalent - AMD Ryzen AI 7 Pro 360 - AMD Ryzen 9 9950X
Intel CPU rating (54th and 1st place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 4 8
P-Threads 4 8
Base Frequency (P) 2.0 GHz 3.7 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 4.8 GHz 5.4 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 12 16
E-Threads 12 16
Base Frequency (E) 1.6 GHz 3.2 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 3.6 GHz 4.7 GHz
Total
Total Cores 16 24
Total Threads 16 24
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 20x 37x
L1 Cache 192K (per core) 192K (per core)
L2 Cache 2560K (per core) 3MB (per core)
L3 Cache 18MB (shared) 36MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No Yes

Package

Transistors - 17.8 billions
Fabrication Process 2 nm 3 nm
TDP (PL1) 15-25 W (configurable) 125 W
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 80 W 250 W
Socket FCBGA2540 FCLGA-1851
Peak Temperature 100°C 105°C
Desktop CPU ranking (#1st place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Intel Xe3 Graphics (4-Core) Intel Arc iGPU (4-Cores)
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 300 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 2500 MHz 2000 MHz
Shading Units 512 512
TMUs 32 32
ROPs 16 16
Execution Units 4 64
TGP 25 W 14 W
iGPU FLOPS
2.6 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - LPDDR5X-8533
- DDR5-7200
- DDR5-7200
Max. Memory Size 128 GB 256 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 115.2 GB/s 115.2 GB/s
ECC Support No Yes

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra 7 366H official page Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 5.0
PCI Express Lanes 20 24

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus or Ultra 7 366H?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!