Intel Core Ultra 9 185H vs Ultra 7 265H
We compared two 16-core laptop CPUs: the 2.3 GHz Intel Core Ultra 9 185H against the 2.2 GHz Ultra 7 265H. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
Review
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
Key Differences
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
- More modern manufacturing process β 3 versus 7 nanometers
- Newer - released 1 year and 1 month later
- Supports up to 128 GB LPDDR5-8400 RAM
- 21% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 2970 vs 2446 points
- 4% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.3 GHz vs 5.1 GHz)
Test in Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasksCinebench
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench Scores (156th and 120th place)
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
| File compression | 1270 MB/sec | 1310 MB/sec |
| Clang compilation | 102.8 Klines/sec | 122.7 Klines/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 342.7 pages/sec | 405.7 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 389.7 Mpixels/sec | 467.8 Mpixels/sec |
| Text processing | 245.1 pages/sec | 325.4 pages/sec |
| Background blur | 45.2 images/sec | 66.5 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 131.5 images/sec | 150.8 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 23.3 Mpixels/sec | 24.4 Mpixels/sec |
PassMark
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
| Integer math | 97.4 GOps/sec | 85.4 GOps/sec |
| Floating point math | 72.2 GOps/sec | 108.9 GOps/sec |
| Find prime numbers | 123M Primes/sec | 335M Primes/sec |
| Random string sorting | 39M Strings/sec | 40.7M Strings/sec |
| Data encryption | 19.5 GBytes/sec | 26 GBytes/sec |
| Data compression | 334.6 MBytes/sec | 334.4 MBytes/sec |
| Physics | 1940 Frames/sec | 2493 Frames/sec |
| Extended instructions | 19.9B Matrices/sec | 26.8B Matrices/sec |
Blender
Blender CPU
Performance Per Watt
| Cinebench 2024 / Watt | 15.2 PPW | 41.1 PPW |
| Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt | 209.4 PPW | 550.3 PPW |
| Passmark CPU Mark / Watt | 446.1 PPW | 1214.3 PPW |
| Blender / Watt | 3.08 PPW | 8.44 PPW |
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.
Recent User Tests
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2025-12-28 (Nicholas) | Cinebench 2024 | 92 / 795 |
| π 2024-12-29 (Remembered2U) | Cinebench 2024 | 107 / 987 |
| π 2024-11-03 (Anish) | Cinebench 2024 | 103 / 886 |
| π 2024-10-01 (Guest #3) | Cinebench 2024 | 108 / 1088 |
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
No benchmark results yet
Specifications
Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 9 185H and Ultra 7 265HGeneral
| Vendor | Intel | Intel |
| Released | December 14, 2023 | January 6, 2025 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| Instruction Set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Meteor Lake | Arrow Lake |
| Model number | 185H | 265H |
| Integrated GPU | Arc Graphics (8-Cores) | Arc Graphics 140T |
| Rival Equivalent | - AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS | - AMD Ryzen 7 260 |
| Successor | - Intel Core Ultra 9 288V | - |
Intel CPU rating (83rd and 42nd place)
CPU
| P-Cores | 6 | 6 |
| P-Threads | 12 | 6 |
| Base Frequency (P) | 2.3 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency (P) | 5.1 GHz | 5.3 GHz |
| E-Cores | 10 | 10 |
| E-Threads | 10 | 10 |
| Base Frequency (E) | 1.8 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency (E) | 3.8 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Total Cores | 16 | 16 |
| Total Threads | 22 | 16 |
| Bus Frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 23x | 22x |
| L1 Cache | 112K (per core) | 192K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 2MB (per core) | 2MB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 24MB (shared) | 24MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | No | No |
Package
| Fabrication Process | 7 nm | 3 nm |
| TDP (PL1) | 35-65 W (configurable) | 20-28 W (configurable) |
| Max. Boost TDP (PL2) | 115 W | 115 W |
| Socket | FCBGA-2049 | FCBGA-2049 |
| Peak Temperature | 110Β°C | 110Β°C |
Laptop processors ranking (103rd and 52nd place)
iGPU
| Integrated Graphics | Arc Graphics (8-Cores) | Arc Graphics 140T |
| GPU Base Clock | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| GPU Boost Clock | 2350 MHz | 2300 MHz |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1024 |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| Execution Units | 128 | 8 |
| TGP | 28 W | 35 W |
iGPU FLOPS
More info: Arc 140T compared to iGPU (8-Cores)
Memory Support
| Memory Types | - LPDDR5-7467 - LPDDR5x-7467 - DDR5-5600 |
- LPDDR5-8400 - LPDDR5x-8400 - DDR5-6400 |
| Max. Memory Size | 96 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
Misc
| Official Site | Intel Core Ultra 9 185H official page | Intel Core Ultra 7 265H official page |
| PCI Express Version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express Lanes | 28 | 28 |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 13