Intel Core Ultra 9 185H vs Ultra 7 265H

We compared two 16-core laptop CPUs: the 2.3 GHz Intel Core Ultra 9 185H against the 2.2 GHz Ultra 7 265H. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 265H and 185H
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
  • More modern manufacturing process – 3 versus 7 nanometers
  • Newer - released 1 year and 1 month later
  • Supports up to 128 GB LPDDR5-8400 RAM
  • 21% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 2970 vs 2446 points
  • 4% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.3 GHz vs 5.1 GHz)

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench Scores (156th and 120th place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 1270 MB/sec 1310 MB/sec
Clang compilation 102.8 Klines/sec 122.7 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 342.7 pages/sec 405.7 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 389.7 Mpixels/sec 467.8 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 245.1 pages/sec 325.4 pages/sec
Background blur 45.2 images/sec 66.5 images/sec
Photo processing 131.5 images/sec 150.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 23.3 Mpixels/sec 24.4 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2] – 492 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 97.4 GOps/sec 85.4 GOps/sec
Floating point math 72.2 GOps/sec 108.9 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 123M Primes/sec 335M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 39M Strings/sec 40.7M Strings/sec
Data encryption 19.5 GBytes/sec 26 GBytes/sec
Data compression 334.6 MBytes/sec 334.4 MBytes/sec
Physics 1940 Frames/sec 2493 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 19.9B Matrices/sec 26.8B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 4148 & 1114 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 15.2 PPW 41.1 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 209.4 PPW 550.3 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 446.1 PPW 1214.3 PPW
Blender / Watt 3.08 PPW 8.44 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-28 (Nicholas)Cinebench 202492 / 795
πŸ“˜ 2024-12-29 (Remembered2U)Cinebench 2024107 / 987
πŸ“˜ 2024-11-03 (Anish)Cinebench 2024103 / 886
πŸ“˜ 2024-10-01 (Guest #3)Cinebench 2024108 / 1088
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
No benchmark results yet

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 9 185H and Ultra 7 265H

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Released December 14, 2023 January 6, 2025
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Meteor Lake Arrow Lake
Model number 185H 265H
Integrated GPU Arc Graphics (8-Cores) Arc Graphics 140T
Rival Equivalent - AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS - AMD Ryzen 7 260
Successor - Intel Core Ultra 9 288V -
Intel CPU rating (83rd and 42nd place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 6 6
P-Threads 12 6
Base Frequency (P) 2.3 GHz 2.2 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.1 GHz 5.3 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 10 10
E-Threads 10 10
Base Frequency (E) 1.8 GHz 1.7 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 3.8 GHz 4.5 GHz
Total
Total Cores 16 16
Total Threads 22 16
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 23x 22x
L1 Cache 112K (per core) 192K (per core)
L2 Cache 2MB (per core) 2MB (per core)
L3 Cache 24MB (shared) 24MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No No

Package

Fabrication Process 7 nm 3 nm
TDP (PL1) 35-65 W (configurable) 20-28 W (configurable)
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 115 W 115 W
Socket FCBGA-2049 FCBGA-2049
Peak Temperature 110Β°C 110Β°C
Laptop processors ranking (103rd and 52nd place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Arc Graphics (8-Cores) Arc Graphics 140T
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 300 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 2350 MHz 2300 MHz
Shading Units 1024 1024
TMUs 64 64
ROPs 32 32
Execution Units 128 8
TGP 28 W 35 W
iGPU FLOPS
4.8 TFLOPS
4.7 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - LPDDR5-7467
- LPDDR5x-7467
- DDR5-5600
- LPDDR5-8400
- LPDDR5x-8400
- DDR5-6400
Max. Memory Size 96 GB 128 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
ECC Support No No

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra 9 185H official page Intel Core Ultra 7 265H official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 5.0
PCI Express Lanes 28 28

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
3 (23.1%)
10 (76.9%)
Total votes: 13

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: Intel Core Ultra 7 265H or Ultra 9 185H?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!