Apple M4 Max GPU (40-core) vs M3 Ultra GPU (80-core)

We performed a head-to-head comparison of the Apple M4 Max GPU (40-core) with 640 pipelines and 5120 shaders against the 4 months newer M3 Ultra GPU (80-core) that utilizes 1280 pipelines and 10240 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score
The "Energy Efficiency" metric has less impact on the NanoReview Score for desktop GPU.

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of M3 Ultra GPU (80-core) over M4 Max GPU (40-core)
Reasons to consider the Apple M3 Ultra GPU (80-core)
  • Performs better (up to 34%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • 75% higher maximum theoretical performance (28.3 vs 16.2 TFLOPS)
  • Has 50% higher memory bandwidth: 819.3 vs 546 GB/s
  • Achieves 27% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (147K vs 116K)
  • Has 2x more shading units (10240 vs 5120)

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Solar Bay 61312 63597
Wild Life Extreme 36641 47814
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur 195 img/sec 204.5 img/sec
Face Detection 125.9 img/sec 126 img/sec
Horizon Detection 4.82 Gpixels/sec 6.53 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 7.47 Gpixels/sec 10.7 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 5.8 Gpixels/sec 9.5 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 1.06 Gpixels/sec 1.05 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 417.4 Gpixels/sec 560.3 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 17079.9 FPS 25267.8 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Cinebench 2024 GPU

Hardware benchmark using Maxon's Cinema 4D rendering engine
Cinebench 2024 GPU

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
Sources: Blender [9], [10]456 & 31 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Apple M4 Max GPU (40-core)
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2025-07-10 (thomas)GeekBench116478
Apple M3 Ultra GPU (80-core)
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2025-03-16 (Tyler)GeekBench145706
📘 2025-03-16 (Tyler)Cinebench 202419448

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 10302 8094
Image Segmentation (HP) 23763 24595
Image Super Resolution (Q) 29314 25190
Face Detection (HP) 42016 38337
Pose Estimation (Q) 105972 111021
Text Classification (SP) 2963 2786
Machine Translation (HP) 6594 4339
Object Detection (SP) 8935 7668
Depth Estimation (Q) 43143 37488
Style Transfer (SP) 221563 244483
Framework Core ML Core ML
Backend GPU GPU
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Apple M4 Max GPU (40-core) and M3 Ultra GPU (80-core)

General

Vendor Apple Apple
Build Integrated Integrated
Released October 30, 2024 March 5, 2025
Case Laptop Desktop
Purpose Professional Professional
Segment Mid-range High-end
Architecture Apple M GPU Apple M GPU
GPU Codename Custom Custom
Rival Equivalent - GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop - GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
Successor - Apple M5 Max GPU (40-core) - Apple M4 Ultra GPU (80-core)
Recommended CPU - Apple M4 Max (16-Core) or above - Apple M3 Ultra or above
Used in CPUs - Apple M4 Max (16-Core) - Apple M3 Ultra
Laptop GPU ranking (#14th place)
Desktop GPU rating (#30th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 500 MHz -
Boost Clock 1578 MHz 1380 MHz
Shading Units 5120 10240
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 320 640
Render Output Units (ROPs) 160 320
Compute Units (Pipelines) 640 1280
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 252 GPixel/s 442 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 505 GTexel/s 883 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
16.2 TFLOPS
28.3 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface Custom Custom
TGP 50 W 140 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 3 nm 3 nm
Transistor Count - 184 billion
Max. Temperature 100°C 100°C

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
Memory Clock 8533 MHz 6400 MHz
Bus 512-bit 1024-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth
819.3 GB/s

API

Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
16 (51.6%)
15 (48.4%)
Total votes: 31

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!