GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop vs GeForce MX570

We compared two discrete laptop gaming GPUs: the GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile 8 GB with 24 pipelines and 3072 shaders against the 1 year and 2 months older GeForce MX570 4 GB that utilizes 16 pipelines and 2048 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Some GPUs come in different configurations. For greater precision, pick a specific config below
TGP / Version
-

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of GeForce MX570 over RTX 4060 Mobile
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop
  • 2.4x higher maximum theoretical performance (14.6 vs 6 TFLOPS)
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 5 nm process technology
  • Includes 4 GB more video memory
  • Supports Nvidia DLSS 3 technology
  • Has 2.7x higher memory bandwidth: 256 vs 96 GB/s
  • Achieves 2.3x more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (97K vs 42K)
  • Features 32 more tensor cores for effective ML and AI workloads
  • Has 50% more shading units (3072 vs 2048)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
120
77
66
44
-
The Witcher 3
141
112
79
42
-
Counter-Strike 2
205
153
110
54
-
Far Cry 6
103
92
75
43
-
Hogwarts Legacy
74
62
45
25
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
95
85
59
37
-
Ghost of Tsushima
74
60
42
23
-
Cyberpunk 2077
82
72
42
21
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
127
116
83
43
-
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 113 -
1080p Ultra 92 -
1440p Ultra 67 -
4K Ultra 37 -
Margin of Error Low High

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 10397 -
Solar Bay 45002 -
Port Royal 5819 -
Fire Strike 26481 -
Wild Life Extreme 19820 -
Night Raid 98330 -
Sources: 3DMark [1]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
97986
Background Blur 142.7 img/sec 77.2 img/sec
Face Detection 103.7 img/sec 40.3 img/sec
Horizon Detection 3.83 Gpixels/sec 1.65 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 4.93 Gpixels/sec 2.13 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 4.63 Gpixels/sec 2.04 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 1.27 Gpixels/sec 0.57 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 430.4 Gpixels/sec 181.5 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 13519.5 FPS 5728.6 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Cinebench 2024 GPU

Hardware benchmark using Maxon's Cinema 4D rendering engine
Cinebench 2024 GPU

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
17346
G2D Mark 731 375
DirectX 11 155 FPS 38 FPS
DirectX 12 72 FPS 30 FPS
GPU Compute 6789 Ops/s 2534 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6] – 22366 & 50 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
3293.54
489.72
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 4321 & 1 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-04 (Viru)Geekbench 6 OpenCL115610
📘 2026-09-04 (Viru)Cinebench 202410216
📘 2026-02-21 (Бенкдикт)Geekbench 6 OpenCL101184
📘 2025-12-18 (AmirtheX)Geekbench 6 OpenCL107583
📘 2025-11-17 (kritan)Cinebench 202410306
GeForce MX570
No benchmark results yet

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
17683
GB6 ML Half Precision
30738
GB6 ML Quantized
13612
Image Classification (SP) 7421 2792
Image Segmentation (HP) 19041 5831
Image Super Resolution (Q) 20913 5115
Face Detection (HP) 35464 9491
Pose Estimation (Q) 67110 19218
Text Classification (SP) 3086 1996
Machine Translation (HP) 4740 1992
Object Detection (SP) 8644 2848
Depth Estimation (Q) 32456 10712
Style Transfer (SP) 142039 44344
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop and GeForce MX570

General

Vendor Nvidia Nvidia
Build Discrete Discrete
Released February 22, 2023 January 1, 2022
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Gaming Gaming
Segment Mid-range Entry-level
Architecture Ada Lovelace Ampere
GPU Codename AD107 (GN21-X4) GA107S
Rival Equivalent - - Radeon 760M
Successor - GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop -
Recommended CPU - Intel Core Ultra 7 155H or above - Intel Core i7 1255U or above
Laptop GPU ranking (43rd and 84th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 1140-2295 MHz (configurable) 1155 MHz
Boost Clock 1470-2370 MHz (configurable) 1477 MHz
Shading Units 3072 2048
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 96 64
Render Output Units (ROPs) 48 40
Compute Units (Pipelines) 24 16
Tensor Cores 96 64
Ray-tracing Cores 24 16
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster 128KB per cluster
L2 Cache 32MB shared 2MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 71-114 GPixel/s 59 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 141-228 GTexel/s 95 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
9-14.6 TFLOPS
6 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 35-140 W (configurable) 45 W
Manufacturing TSMC Samsung
Fabrication Process 5 nm 8 nm
Die Size 156 mm² 200 mm²
Transistor Count 18.9 billion 8.7 billion
Transistor Density 121.15 MTr/mm² 43.5 MTr/mm²

Memory

Memory Type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory Size 8 GB 4 GB
Memory Clock 2000 MHz 1500 MHz
Effective Memory Speed 16000 Mbps 12000 Mbps
Bus 128-bit 64-bit
ECC No -
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
96 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 3.0 3.0
CUDA 8.9 8.6
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS DLSS 3 No
DisplayPort 1.4a 1.4

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
5 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: 5

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!