Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) vs GeForce MX570

We performed a head-to-head comparison of the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) with 96 pipelines and 768 shaders against the 1 year and 5 months newer GeForce MX570 4 GB that utilizes 16 pipelines and 2048 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of GeForce MX570 over Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
Reasons to consider the GeForce MX570
  • 2.5x higher maximum theoretical performance (6 vs 2.4 TFLOPS)
  • Includes 4 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 8 nm process technology
  • Achieves 2.5x more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (42K vs 17K)
  • Has 2.7x more shading units (2048 vs 768)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
21
11
-
-
-
The Witcher 3
12
11
-
-
-
Counter-Strike 2
19
12
9
-
-
Far Cry 6
14
11
-
-
-
Hogwarts Legacy
9
-
-
-
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
14
12
10
-
-
Ghost of Tsushima
11
-
-
-
-
Cyberpunk 2077
-
-
-
-
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
15
13
9
-
-
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 14 -
1080p Ultra 10 -
1440p Ultra - -
4K Ultra - -
Margin of Error Low High

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 1282 -
Fire Strike 4411 -
Wild Life Extreme 3119 -
Night Raid 14097 -
Sources: 3DMark [1]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur 34.5 img/sec 77.2 img/sec
Face Detection 27.4 img/sec 40.3 img/sec
Horizon Detection 0.75 Gpixels/sec 1.65 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 1.11 Gpixels/sec 2.13 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 0.39 Gpixels/sec 2.04 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.18 Gpixels/sec 0.57 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 55.6 Gpixels/sec 181.5 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 3061.7 FPS 5728.6 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark - 375
DirectX 11 - 38 FPS
DirectX 12 - 30 FPS
GPU Compute - 2534 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5] – 50 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
Sources: Blender [9] – 1 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-25 -> op1Geekbench 6 OpenCL16849
📘 2026-07-25 -> sevensraysGeekbench 6 OpenCL16620
📘 2026-04-15 -> maheshkondrajuGeekbench 6 OpenCL15810
GeForce MX570
No benchmark results yet

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 1428 2792
Image Segmentation (HP) 2420 5831
Image Super Resolution (Q) 1551 5115
Face Detection (HP) 3685 9491
Pose Estimation (Q) 6255 19218
Text Classification (SP) 938 1996
Machine Translation (HP) 1028 1992
Object Detection (SP) 1581 2848
Depth Estimation (Q) 4305 10712
Style Transfer (SP) 26119 44344
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) and GeForce MX570

General

Vendor Intel Nvidia
Build Integrated Discrete
Released August 15, 2020 January 1, 2022
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Gaming
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture Generation 12.1 Ampere
GPU Codename Tiger Lake GT2 GA107S
Rival Equivalent - - Radeon 760M
Recommended CPU - Intel Core i7 1160G7 or above - Intel Core i7 1255U or above
Used in CPUs - Intel Core 7 250H
- Intel Core 9 270H
- Intel Core 7 150U
- Intel Core i7 13705H
- Intel Core i9 13905H
- Intel Core i7 1355U
- Intel Core i7 1365U
- Intel Core i7 1360P
- and 23 more
-
Laptop GPU ranking (125th and 84th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 300 MHz 1155 MHz
Boost Clock 950-1550 MHz (configurable) 1477 MHz
Shading Units 768 2048
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 48 64
Render Output Units (ROPs) 24 40
Compute Units (Pipelines) 96 16
Tensor Cores - 64
Ray-tracing Cores - 16
L1 Cache - 128KB per cluster
L2 Cache 1024KB shared 2MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 23-37 GPixel/s 59 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 46-74 GTexel/s 95 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
6 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface Ring Bus PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 15 W 45 W
Manufacturing Intel Samsung
Fabrication Process 10 nm 8 nm
Die Size 146 mm² 200 mm²
Transistor Count - 8.7 billion
Transistor Density - 43.5 MTr/mm²

Memory

Memory Type System Shared GDDR6
Memory Size System RAM Dependent 4 GB
Memory Clock System RAM Dependent 1500 MHz
Effective Memory Speed System RAM Dependent 12000 Mbps
Bus - 64-bit
ECC No -
Memory Bandwidth

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.2 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.1 3.0
CUDA - 8.6
Ray Tracing No Yes
DLSS No No
DisplayPort - 1.4

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
1 (12.5%)
7 (87.5%)
Total votes: 8

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!