AMD Radeon 760M vs GeForce MX570
VS
AMD Radeon 760M
Phoenix
Nvidia GeForce MX570
GA107S
We performed a head-to-head comparison of the Radeon 760M with 8 pipelines and 512 shaders against the 1 year older GeForce MX570 4 GB that utilizes 16 pipelines and 2048 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.
Review
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Radeon 760M
- Manufactured using a more efficient 4 nm process technology
Reasons to consider the GeForce MX570
- Includes 4 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory
- 2.1x higher maximum theoretical performance (6 vs 2.9 TFLOPS)
- Has 4x more shading units (2048 vs 512)
- Achieves 90% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (42K vs 22K)
Gaming Performance
Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutionsGames
| Forza Horizon 5 | 41 21 17 9 |
- |
| The Witcher 3 | 19 19 9 - |
- |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 35 23 19 - |
- |
| Far Cry 6 | 32 24 19 - |
- |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 15 12 - - |
- |
| CoD: Modern Warfare III | 28 24 17 10 |
- |
| Ghost of Tsushima | 19 11 9 - |
- |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 14 16 9 - |
- |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 26 23 14 - |
- |
| 1080p High | 25 | - |
| 1080p Ultra | 19 | - |
| 1440p Ultra | 13 | - |
| 4K Ultra | - | - |
| Margin of Error | Low | High |
Benchmarks
Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps3D Mark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
| Time Spy | 2372 | - |
| Solar Bay | 9378 | - |
| Port Royal | 975 | - |
| Fire Strike | 7074 | - |
| Wild Life Extreme | 4630 | - |
| Night Raid | 29486 | - |
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
GB6 Compute Score
| Background Blur | 57.8 img/sec | 77.2 img/sec |
| Face Detection | 28.7 img/sec | 40.3 img/sec |
| Horizon Detection | 0.8 Gpixels/sec | 1.65 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge Detection | 1 Gpixels/sec | 2.13 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 0.82 Gpixels/sec | 2.04 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature Matching | 0.29 Gpixels/sec | 0.57 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 85.4 Gpixels/sec | 181.5 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle Physics | 2844.5 FPS | 5728.6 FPS |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
Passmark Graphics
G3D Mark Score
| G2D Mark | 890 | 375 |
| DirectX 11 | 52 FPS | 38 FPS |
| DirectX 12 | 25 FPS | 30 FPS |
| GPU Compute | 2838 Ops/s | 2534 Ops/s |
Blender
Blender GPU
Artificial Intelligence Tests
Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasksGeekBench 6 ML
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
| Image Classification (SP) | 3449 | 2792 |
| Image Segmentation (HP) | 4098 | 5831 |
| Image Super Resolution (Q) | 7937 | 5115 |
| Face Detection (HP) | 12168 | 9491 |
| Pose Estimation (Q) | 29915 | 19218 |
| Text Classification (SP) | 2571 | 1996 |
| Machine Translation (HP) | 3852 | 1992 |
| Object Detection (SP) | 2687 | 2848 |
| Depth Estimation (Q) | 14163 | 10712 |
| Style Transfer (SP) | 59966 | 44344 |
| Framework | ONNX | ONNX |
| Backend | DirectML | DirectML |
Specifications
Technical specifications of Radeon 760M and GeForce MX570General
| Vendor | Amd | Nvidia |
| Build | Integrated | Discrete |
| Released | January 4, 2023 | January 1, 2022 |
| Case | Laptop | Laptop |
| Purpose | Generic | Gaming |
| Segment | Entry-level | Entry-level |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ampere |
| GPU Codename | Phoenix | GA107S |
| Rival Equivalent | - Intel Arc iGPU (4-Cores) | - Radeon 760M |
| Successor | - Radeon 8040S | - |
| Recommended CPU | - AMD Ryzen 5 7640U or above | - Intel Core i7 1255U or above |
| Used in CPUs | - AMD Ryzen 5 230 - AMD Ryzen 5 240 - AMD Ryzen 5 8600G - AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS - AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS - AMD Ryzen 5 8640U - AMD Ryzen 5 7640U - AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS |
- |
Laptop GPU ranking (112th and 84th place)
Graphics Processing Unit
| Base Clock | 800 MHz | 1155 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 2600-2800 MHz (configurable) | 1477 MHz |
| Shading Units | 512 | 2048 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) | 32 | 64 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs) | 16 | 40 |
| Compute Units (Pipelines) | 8 | 16 |
| Tensor Cores | - | 64 |
| Ray-tracing Cores | 6 | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 128KB per cluster | 128KB per cluster |
| L2 Cache | 2MB shared | 2MB shared |
| Instructions Per Cycle | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Raw Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 42-45 GPixel/s | 59 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 83-90 GTexel/s | 95 GTexel/s |
FLOPS (FP32)
Physical
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| TGP | 15 W | 45 W |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | Samsung |
| Fabrication Process | 4 nm | 8 nm |
| Die Size | 178 mm² | 200 mm² |
| Transistor Count | 25.4 billion | 8.7 billion |
| Transistor Density | 142.7 MTr/mm² | 43.5 MTr/mm² |
Memory
| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Size | - | 4 GB |
| Memory Clock | - | 1500 MHz |
| Effective Memory Speed | - | 12000 Mbps |
| Bus | - | 64-bit |
Memory Bandwidth
API
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| CUDA | - | 8.6 |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS | No | No |
| DisplayPort | 2.1 | 1.4 |
Cast your vote
Total votes: < 1