Intel UHD Graphics 770 vs GeForce RTX 5060

We performed a head-to-head comparison of the Intel UHD Graphics 770 with 32 pipelines and 256 shaders against the 3 years and 6 months newer GeForce RTX 5060 8 GB that utilizes 30 pipelines and 3840 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score
The "Energy Efficiency" metric has less impact on the NanoReview Score for desktop GPU.

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of RTX 5060 over UHD Graphics 770
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 5060
  • Performs significantly better (up to 23.4x) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • 24x higher maximum theoretical performance (19.2 vs 0.8 TFLOPS)
  • Shows 17x higher average frame rate in modern games at QHD resolution – 85 vs 5 FPS
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 5 nm process technology
  • Ray-tracing support with 30 dedicated RT cores

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
16
-
-
-
142
94
84
58
The Witcher 3
-
-
-
-
166
137
100
53
Counter-Strike 2
14
10
-
-
238
188
131
74
Far Cry 6
10
-
-
-
125
116
93
53
Hogwarts Legacy -
94
79
59
30
CoD: Modern Warfare III
-
-
-
-
117
108
80
51
Ghost of Tsushima
9
-
-
-
85
71
55
30
Cyberpunk 2077 -
99
89
56
27
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
-
-
-
-
156
141
106
57
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 9 136
1080p Ultra - 114
1440p Ultra - 85
4K Ultra - 48
Margin of Error Low Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
RTX 5060 +2243%
13989
Time Spy 809 13751
Solar Bay - 64641
Port Royal - 8694
Fire Strike 2899 37594
Wild Life Extreme 1960 26198
Night Raid 11888 133318
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
RTX 5060 +1455%
127848
Background Blur 17.9 img/sec 209.1 img/sec
Face Detection 11.6 img/sec 134.3 img/sec
Horizon Detection 0.32 Gpixels/sec 4.67 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 0.51 Gpixels/sec 6.13 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 0.31 Gpixels/sec 6.39 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.1 Gpixels/sec 1.36 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 20.2 Gpixels/sec 607.8 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 1156.4 FPS 18827.5 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
RTX 5060 +980%
20623
G2D Mark 551 1145
DirectX 11 11 FPS 200 FPS
DirectX 12 9 FPS 77 FPS
GPU Compute 816 Ops/s 10396 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6] – 13496 & 16484 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
RTX 5060 +3016%
3690.41
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 2 & 721 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel UHD Graphics 770
No benchmark results yet
GeForce RTX 5060
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-08-20 -> bangGeekbench 6 OpenCL143443

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) - 8362
Image Segmentation (HP) - 22831
Image Super Resolution (Q) - 22375
Face Detection (HP) - 41955
Pose Estimation (Q) - 84685
Text Classification (SP) - 3296
Machine Translation (HP) - 5083
Object Detection (SP) - 11023
Depth Estimation (Q) - 38817
Style Transfer (SP) - 155103
Framework - ONNX
Backend - DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Intel UHD Graphics 770 and GeForce RTX 5060

General

Vendor Intel Nvidia
Build Integrated Discrete
Released November 4, 2021 April 15, 2025
Launch price (MSRP) - $299
Case Laptop Desktop
Purpose Generic Gaming
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture Generation 12.2 Blackwell 2.0
GPU Codename Alder Lake GT1 GB206-250
Rival Equivalent - - Radeon RX 9060 XT
Recommended CPU - Intel Core i5 12500 or above - Intel Core Ultra 5 245K or above
Used in CPUs - Intel Core i7 14700HX
- Intel Core i7 14650HX
- Intel Core i5 14500HX
- Intel Core i9 14900KS
- Intel Core i9 14900
- Intel Core i7 14700
- Intel Core i5 14600
- Intel Core i5 14500
- and 24 more
-
Laptop GPU ranking (#136th place)
Desktop GPU rating (#42nd place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 300 MHz 2280 MHz
Boost Clock 1350-1650 MHz (configurable) 2500 MHz
Shading Units 256 3840
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 16 120
Render Output Units (ROPs) 8 48
Compute Units (Pipelines) 32 30
Tensor Cores No 120
Ray-tracing Cores No 30
L1 Cache - 128KB per cluster
L2 Cache - 32MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 11-13 GPixel/s 120 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 22-26 GTexel/s 300 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
0.7-0.8 TFLOPS
RTX 5060 +2300%
19.2 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface Ring Bus PCIe 5.0 x8
TGP 15 W 145 W
Manufacturing Intel TSMC
Fabrication Process 10 nm 5 nm
Die Size - 181 mm²
Transistor Count - 21.9 billion
Transistor Density - 120.99 MTr/mm²
Max. Temperature 100°C 89°C

Memory

Memory Type System Shared GDDR7
Memory Size - 8 GB
Memory Clock - 1750 MHz
Effective Memory Speed - 28000 Mbps
Bus - 128-bit
ECC - No
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12.2
Vulkan 1.2 1.4
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 3.0 3.0
CUDA - 12.0
Ray Tracing No Yes
DLSS No DLSS 4
DisplayPort 1.4a 2.1b

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
0 (0%)
4 (100%)
Total votes: 4

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
6 7 January 8, 2026 at 10:12 PM
5060 is very good :)
0 Reply