Intel Xe3 Graphics (4-Core) vs Arc 130T

We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Intel Xe3 Graphics (4-Core) with 4 pipelines and 512 shaders against the 1 year older Arc 130T that utilizes 7 pipelines and 896 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of Arc 130T over Xe3 Graphics (4-Core)
Reasons to consider the Intel Xe3 Graphics (4-Core)
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 3 nm process technology
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc 130T
  • 50% higher maximum theoretical performance (3.9 vs 2.6 TFLOPS)
  • Features 80 more tensor cores for effective ML and AI workloads
  • Achieves 56% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (36K vs 23K)
  • Has 75% more shading units (896 vs 512)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5 -
46
26
21
10
The Witcher 3 -
37
29
22
10
Counter-Strike 2 -
40
28
22
-
Far Cry 6 -
34
28
23
11
Hogwarts Legacy -
19
11
-
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III -
29
27
20
11
Ghost of Tsushima -
22
14
11
-
Cyberpunk 2077 -
21
16
11
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider -
34
32
20
13
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High - 31
1080p Ultra - 23
1440p Ultra - 18
4K Ultra - 9
Margin of Error High Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy - 3409
Solar Bay - 12704
Port Royal - 1902
Fire Strike - 8001
Wild Life Extreme - 5990
Night Raid - 36940
Sources: 3DMark [1]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Arc 130T +56%
36282
Background Blur 57.6 img/sec 70.9 img/sec
Face Detection 29.1 img/sec 34.9 img/sec
Horizon Detection 0.79 Gpixels/sec 1.13 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 1.02 Gpixels/sec 1.42 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 1.02 Gpixels/sec 1.96 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.34 Gpixels/sec 0.45 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 61.2 Gpixels/sec 131.5 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 3352.7 FPS 7360.9 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark - 791
DirectX 11 - 42 FPS
DirectX 12 - 27 FPS
GPU Compute - 2620 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5] – 360 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
Sources: Blender [9] – 10 samples

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 4265 3978
Image Segmentation (HP) 11549 8374
Image Super Resolution (Q) 4466 5792
Face Detection (HP) 16012 13023
Pose Estimation (Q) 8425 16149
Text Classification (SP) 1380 1356
Machine Translation (HP) 4037 2594
Object Detection (SP) 4026 4754
Depth Estimation (Q) 10708 12040
Style Transfer (SP) 35823 51653
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Intel Xe3 Graphics (4-Core) and Arc 130T

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Build Integrated Integrated
Released January 5, 2026 January 6, 2025
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Generic
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture Celestial Xe+
GPU Codename Panther Lake Arrow Lake iGPU
Rival Equivalent - - Radeon 840M
Recommended CPU - Intel Core Ultra 9 386H or above - Intel Core Ultra 5 225H or above
Used in CPUs - Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
- Intel Core Ultra 7 366H
- Intel Core Ultra 7 365
- Intel Core Ultra 7 356H
- Intel Core Ultra 7 355
- Intel Core Ultra 5 336H
- Intel Core Ultra 5 335
- Intel Core Ultra 5 325
- Intel Core Ultra 5 225H
Laptop GPU ranking (75th and 99th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 300 MHz 300 MHz
Boost Clock 2500 MHz 2200 MHz
Shading Units 512 896
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 32 56
Render Output Units (ROPs) 16 28
Compute Units (Pipelines) 4 7
Tensor Cores 32 112
Ray-tracing Cores 4 7
L1 Cache 64KB per cluster -
L2 Cache 4MB shared 4MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 40 GPixel/s 62 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 80 GTexel/s 123 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
Arc 130T +50%
3.9 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 5.0 PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 25 W 35 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 3 nm 5 nm
Max. Temperature 100°C 110°C

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
ECC No -

API

DirectX 12.1 12.2
Vulkan 1.4 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 3.0 3.0
CUDA - No
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No
DisplayPort 2.1 2.1

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
1 (33.3%)
2 (66.7%)
Total votes: 3

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!