Nvidia RTX 5000 Ada vs 4000 Ada

We compared two discrete desktop graphics cards: the Nvidia RTX 5000 Ada 32 GB with 100 pipelines and 12800 shaders against the 4000 Ada 20 GB that utilizes 48 pipelines and 6144 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Value for money (Beta)

We use average GPU prices from all manufacturers by default. Enter the current price of a specific card for better accuracy.
Currency
32 GB GDDR6
VS
20 GB GDDR6
8.5
(Bad)
Value Index
8.8
(Bad)

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of RTX 4000 Ada over RTX 5000 Ada
Reasons to consider the Nvidia RTX 5000 Ada
  • Performs significantly better (up to 2x) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • 2.4x higher maximum theoretical performance (65.3 vs 26.7 TFLOPS)
  • Shows 40% higher average frame rate in modern games at QHD resolution – 129 vs 92 FPS
  • Includes 12 GB more video memory
  • Features 208 more tensor cores for effective ML and AI workloads
  • Achieves 71% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (260K vs 151K)
  • Has 60% higher memory bandwidth: 576 vs 360 GB/s
  • Has 2.1x more shading units (12800 vs 6144)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
201
141
132
98
149
98
91
63
The Witcher 3
212
184
133
73
177
143
103
54
Counter-Strike 2
292
211
158
86
253
201
135
80
Far Cry 6
165
153
132
81
131
123
101
58
Hogwarts Legacy
139
114
92
51
102
82
66
34
CoD: Modern Warfare III
182
176
137
91
126
119
88
56
Ghost of Tsushima
129
106
93
59
94
79
61
33
Cyberpunk 2077
160
143
99
48
112
96
64
30
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
265
241
188
101
175
157
119
65
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 194 147
1080p Ultra 163 122
1440p Ultra 129 92
4K Ultra 76 53
Margin of Error High High

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
28751
14674
Time Spy 18364 14438
Solar Bay 128428 65875
Port Royal 17986 8974
Fire Strike 49922 37396
Wild Life Extreme 52866 -
Night Raid 139369 158480
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
260099
151680
Background Blur 286.6 img/sec 235.3 img/sec
Face Detection 220.4 img/sec 157.9 img/sec
Horizon Detection 9.93 Gpixels/sec 5.53 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 13.7 Gpixels/sec 7.44 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 18.9 Gpixels/sec 7.87 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 2.2 Gpixels/sec 1.58 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 1580 Gpixels/sec 737.7 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 41235.6 FPS 22409.2 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
30791
23708
G2D Mark 1009 1112
DirectX 11 271 FPS 203 FPS
DirectX 12 110 FPS 93 FPS
GPU Compute 20730 Ops/s 11917 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6] – 223 & 1113 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
7698.51
4449.3
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 31 & 68 samples

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
24715
22372
GB6 ML Half Precision
36753
35651
GB6 ML Quantized
19649
17081
Image Classification (SP) 9943 9717
Image Segmentation (HP) 19696 19365
Image Super Resolution (Q) 32252 29227
Face Detection (HP) 43098 40416
Pose Estimation (Q) 138689 105639
Text Classification (SP) 2893 3577
Machine Translation (HP) 4064 4193
Object Detection (SP) 12467 10820
Depth Estimation (Q) 50352 36574
Style Transfer (SP) 265482 200936
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Nvidia RTX 5000 Ada and 4000 Ada

General

Vendor Nvidia Nvidia
Build Discrete Discrete
Released August 9, 2023 August 9, 2023
Launch price (MSRP) $4000 $1250
Case Desktop Desktop
Purpose Professional Gaming
Segment High-end High-end
Architecture Ada Lovelace Ada Lovelace
GPU Codename AD102 AD104
Recommended CPU - Intel Core i9 14900K or above - Intel Core i7 14700K or above
Desktop GPU rating (9th and 35th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 1155 MHz 1500 MHz
Boost Clock 2550 MHz 2175 MHz
Shading Units 12800 6144
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 400 192
Render Output Units (ROPs) 176 80
Compute Units (Pipelines) 100 48
Tensor Cores 400 192
Ray-tracing Cores 100 48
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster 128KB per cluster
L2 Cache 72MB shared 48MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 449 GPixel/s 174 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 1020 GTexel/s 418 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
RTX 5000 Ada +145%
65.3 TFLOPS
26.7 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
TGP 250 W 130 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 5 nm 5 nm
Die Size 609 mm² 294 mm²
Transistor Count 76 billion 35 billion
Transistor Density 124.79 MTr/mm² 119.05 MTr/mm²

Memory

Memory Type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory Size 32 GB 20 GB
Memory Clock 2250 MHz 2250 MHz
Effective Memory Speed 18000 Mbps 18000 Mbps
Bus 256-bit 160-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
360 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 3.0 3.0
CUDA 8.9 8.9
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS DLSS 3 DLSS 3
DisplayPort 1.4a 1.4a

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
3 (60%)
2 (40%)
Total votes: 5

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!