Nvidia RTX Pro 1000 Laptop (Blackwell) vs 2000 Ada

We performed a head-to-head comparison of the Nvidia RTX Pro 1000 Mobile (Blackwell) 8 GB with 20 pipelines and 2560 shaders against the 3 years and 1 month older 2000 Ada 16 GB that utilizes 22 pipelines and 2816 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score
The "Energy Efficiency" metric has less impact on the NanoReview Score for desktop GPU.

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of RTX 2000 Ada over RTX Pro 1000 Mobile (Blackwell)
Reasons to consider the Nvidia RTX Pro 1000 Laptop (Blackwell)
  • Has 50% higher memory bandwidth: 384 vs 256 GB/s
  • Supports Nvidia DLSS 4 technology
Reasons to consider the Nvidia RTX 2000 Ada
  • Includes 8 GB more video memory

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
105
65
54
37
-
The Witcher 3
117
93
66
37
-
Counter-Strike 2
170
123
87
41
-
Far Cry 6
90
79
60
34
-
Hogwarts Legacy
63
49
35
19
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
74
64
46
28
-
Ghost of Tsushima
59
44
33
20
-
Cyberpunk 2077
62
59
33
14
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
98
90
61
33
-
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 93 -
1080p Ultra 74 -
1440p Ultra 53 -
4K Ultra 29 -
Margin of Error High High

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 8256 -
Solar Bay 36840 -
Port Royal 5212 -
Fire Strike 21279 -
Wild Life Extreme 18390 -
Night Raid 97812 -
Sources: 3DMark [1]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur 137.7 img/sec 170.5 img/sec
Face Detection 95 img/sec 102.8 img/sec
Horizon Detection 2.99 Gpixels/sec 3.25 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 3.89 Gpixels/sec 4.12 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 4.7 Gpixels/sec 4.06 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 1.11 Gpixels/sec 1.13 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 396.8 Gpixels/sec 353.4 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 12852.4 FPS 12273.1 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark 729 1073
DirectX 11 116 FPS 138 FPS
DirectX 12 72 FPS 71 FPS
GPU Compute 5720 Ops/s 7810 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6] – 592 & 1055 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 19 & 59 samples

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 6114 6382
Image Segmentation (HP) 17332 16489
Image Super Resolution (Q) 15867 17694
Face Detection (HP) 32890 32453
Pose Estimation (Q) 60048 56937
Text Classification (SP) 2929 3097
Machine Translation (HP) 4631 4324
Object Detection (SP) 7844 7656
Depth Estimation (Q) 26902 29700
Style Transfer (SP) 94600 116441
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Nvidia RTX Pro 1000 Laptop (Blackwell) and 2000 Ada

General

Vendor Nvidia Nvidia
Build Discrete Discrete
Released March 18, 2025 February 12, 2022
Launch price (MSRP) - $649
Case Laptop Desktop
Purpose Professional Professional
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture Blackwell 2.0 Ada Lovelace
GPU Codename GB207-300-A1 AD107
Recommended CPU - Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX or above - Intel Core i7 14700K or above
Laptop GPU ranking (#44th place)
Desktop GPU rating (#46th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 1020-1627 MHz (configurable) 1620 MHz
Boost Clock 1627-2407 MHz (configurable) 2130 MHz
Shading Units 2560 2816
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 80 88
Render Output Units (ROPs) 32 48
Compute Units (Pipelines) 20 22
Tensor Cores 80 88
Ray-tracing Cores 20 22
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster 128KB per cluster
L2 Cache 32MB shared 12MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 52-77 GPixel/s 102 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 130-193 GTexel/s 187 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
8.3-12.3 TFLOPS
12 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 5.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 35-115 W (configurable) 70 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 5 nm 5 nm
Die Size 149 mm² 159 mm²
Transistor Count 16.9 billion 18 billion
Transistor Density 113.42 MTr/mm² 113.21 MTr/mm²

Memory

Memory Type GDDR7 GDDR6
Memory Size 8 GB 16 GB
Memory Clock 1500 MHz 2000 MHz
Effective Memory Speed 24000 Mbps 16000 Mbps
Bus 128-bit 128-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth

API

DirectX 12.2 12
Vulkan 1.4 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 3.0 3.0
CUDA 12 8.9
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS DLSS 4 DLSS 3
DisplayPort 2.1b 1.4a

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!