AMD Radeon 610M vs Apple M5 GPU (10-Core)

We compared two integrated laptop graphics cards: the Radeon 610M with 2 pipelines and 128 shaders against the 3 years and 1 month newer Apple M5 GPU (10-Core) that utilizes 160 pipelines and 1280 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of M5 GPU (10-Core) over Radeon 610M
Reasons to consider the Apple M5 GPU (10-Core)
  • Performs significantly better (up to 12x) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • 6.8x higher maximum theoretical performance (4.1 vs 0.6 TFLOPS)
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 3 nm process technology
  • Achieves 14.9x more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (75K vs 5K)
  • Has 10x more shading units (1280 vs 128)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
11
-
-
-
-
Counter-Strike 2
16
11
-
-
-
Far Cry 6
9
-
-
-
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
13
11
9
-
-
Ghost of Tsushima
-
-
-
-
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
-
9
-
-
-
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 9 -
1080p Ultra - -
1440p Ultra - -
4K Ultra - -
Margin of Error Low Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
5337
Time Spy 519 -
Solar Bay 2068 24536
Port Royal 291 -
Fire Strike 1745 -
Wild Life Extreme 998 12278
Night Raid 7335 -
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 GPU Compute

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
75777
Background Blur 12 img/sec 155.7 img/sec
Face Detection 6.42 img/sec 178.1 img/sec
Horizon Detection 0.16 Gpixels/sec 2.22 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 0.23 Gpixels/sec 2.87 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 0.16 Gpixels/sec 5.8 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.95 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 18.2 Gpixels/sec 190.7 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 828.6 FPS 6579.1 FPS
API OpenCL Metal
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Cinebench 2024 GPU

Hardware benchmark using Maxon's Cinema 4D rendering engine
Cinebench 2024 GPU

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark 535 -
DirectX 11 17 FPS -
DirectX 12 7 FPS -
GPU Compute 768 Ops/s -
Sources: PassMark [5] – 194 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
47.48
2011.24
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 47 & 145 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Radeon 610M
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-05-05 (StarSophia)Steel Nomad Light614
Apple M5 GPU (10-Core)
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-01-03 -> RennsportGeekbench 6 OpenCL48688

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
13289
GB6 ML Half Precision
24800
GB6 ML Quantized
23572
Image Classification (SP) 660 6348
Image Segmentation (HP) 627 16813
Image Super Resolution (Q) 2053 30322
Face Detection (HP) 2153 34387
Pose Estimation (Q) 5787 111591
Text Classification (SP) 713 2319
Machine Translation (HP) 1114 5555
Object Detection (SP) 709 6450
Depth Estimation (Q) 3233 53195
Style Transfer (SP) 11091 82314
Framework ONNX Core ML
Backend DirectML GPU
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]
Results were compared using different ML frameworks

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon 610M and Apple M5 GPU (10-Core)

General

Vendor Amd Apple
Build Integrated Integrated
Released October 1, 2022 October 15, 2025
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Professional
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture RDNA 2.0 Apple M GPU
GPU Codename Mendocino Custom
Rival Equivalent - - Adreno X2-90
Successor - - Apple M6 GPU (12-core)
Recommended CPU - AMD Ryzen 5 7520U or above - Apple M5 (10-Core) or above
Used in CPUs - AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX
- AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
- AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX
- AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
- AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
- AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
- AMD Ryzen 7 9700X
- AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
- and 6 more
- Apple M5 (10-Core)
Laptop GPU ranking (129th and 63rd place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 400 MHz -
Boost Clock 1900-2200 MHz (configurable) 1620 MHz
Shading Units 128 1280
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 8 80
Render Output Units (ROPs) 4 40
Compute Units (Pipelines) 2 160
Ray-tracing Cores 2 -
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster -
L2 Cache 2MB shared -
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 8-9 GPixel/s 65 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 15-18 GTexel/s 130 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
0.5-0.6 TFLOPS
4.1 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 Custom
TGP 15 W -
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 6 nm 3 nm
Die Size 122 mm² -
Transistor Count 3.4 billion 28 billion
Transistor Density 27.87 MTr/mm² -
Max. Temperature - 100°C

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
Memory Clock - 9600 MHz
Bus - 128-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth

API

DirectX 12 -
Vulkan 1.3 -
OpenGL 4.6 -
OpenCL 2.0 -
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!