AMD Radeon 610M vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)

We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Radeon 610M with 2 pipelines and 128 shaders against the 2 years and 2 months older Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) that utilizes 80 pipelines and 640 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) over Radeon 610M
Reasons to consider the Radeon 610M
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 6 nm process technology
  • Ray-tracing support with 2 dedicated RT cores
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)
  • Performs significantly better (up to 92%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • 3.2x higher maximum theoretical performance (1.9 vs 0.6 TFLOPS)
  • Achieves 2.8x more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (14K vs 5K)
  • Has 5x more shading units (640 vs 128)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
11
-
-
-
21
10
-
-
The Witcher 3 -
12
9
-
-
Counter-Strike 2
16
11
-
-
16
11
9
-
Far Cry 6
9
-
-
-
13
10
-
-
Hogwarts Legacy -
-
-
-
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
13
11
9
-
12
12
10
-
Ghost of Tsushima
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
-
9
-
-
12
12
-
-
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 9 12
1080p Ultra - 9
1440p Ultra - -
4K Ultra - -
Margin of Error Low Medium

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 519 1230
Solar Bay 2068 -
Port Royal 291 -
Fire Strike 1745 4196
Wild Life Extreme 998 2124
Night Raid 7335 15167
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur 12 img/sec 31 img/sec
Face Detection 6.42 img/sec 23.3 img/sec
Horizon Detection 0.16 Gpixels/sec 0.61 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 0.23 Gpixels/sec 0.87 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 0.16 Gpixels/sec 0.36 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.15 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 18.2 Gpixels/sec 36.1 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 828.6 FPS 2493.2 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark 535 392
DirectX 11 17 FPS 16 FPS
DirectX 12 7 FPS 12 FPS
GPU Compute 768 Ops/s 1158 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6] – 194 & 69410 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
Sources: Blender [9] – 47 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Radeon 610M
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-05-05 (StarSophia)Steel Nomad Light614
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)
No benchmark results yet

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 660 1149
Image Segmentation (HP) 627 1796
Image Super Resolution (Q) 2053 1394
Face Detection (HP) 2153 2775
Pose Estimation (Q) 5787 5476
Text Classification (SP) 713 981
Machine Translation (HP) 1114 905
Object Detection (SP) 709 1277
Depth Estimation (Q) 3233 3737
Style Transfer (SP) 11091 22348
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon 610M and Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)

General

Vendor Amd Intel
Build Integrated Integrated
Released October 1, 2022 August 15, 2020
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Generic
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture RDNA 2.0 Generation 12.1
GPU Codename Mendocino Tiger Lake GT2
Recommended CPU - AMD Ryzen 5 7520U or above - Intel Core i5 1130G7 or above
Used in CPUs - AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX
- AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
- AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX
- AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
- AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
- AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
- AMD Ryzen 7 9700X
- AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
- and 6 more
- Intel Core 5 220U
- Intel Core 5 220H
- Intel Core i5 1334U
- Intel Core 5 120U
- Intel Core i5 1335U
- Intel Core i5 1345U
- Intel Core i5 1340P
- Intel Core i5 13500H
- and 14 more
Laptop GPU ranking (126th and 134th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 400 MHz 300 MHz
Boost Clock 1900-2200 MHz (configurable) 850-1500 MHz (configurable)
Shading Units 128 640
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 8 40
Render Output Units (ROPs) 4 20
Compute Units (Pipelines) 2 80
Tensor Cores - No
Ray-tracing Cores 2 No
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster -
L2 Cache 2MB shared 1024KB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 8-9 GPixel/s 17-30 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 15-18 GTexel/s 34-60 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
0.5-0.6 TFLOPS
1.1-1.9 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 Ring Bus
TGP 15 W 15 W
Manufacturing TSMC Intel
Fabrication Process 6 nm 10 nm
Die Size 122 mm² 146 mm²
Transistor Count 3.4 billion -
Transistor Density 27.87 MTr/mm² -

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
Memory Size - System RAM Dependent
Memory Clock - System RAM Dependent
Effective Memory Speed - System RAM Dependent
ECC No No

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.0 2.1
Ray Tracing Yes No
DLSS No No

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
10 (17.9%)
46 (82.1%)
Total votes: 56

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!