AMD Radeon 760M vs Intel Arc 130T

VS
Intel Arc 130T
Arrow Lake iGPU

We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Radeon 760M with 8 pipelines and 512 shaders against the 2 years and 1 month newer Intel Arc 130T that utilizes 7 pipelines and 896 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of Arc 130T over Radeon 760M
Reasons to consider the Radeon 760M
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 4 nm process technology
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc 130T
  • Performs significantly better (up to 41%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • Shows 38% higher average frame rate in modern games at QHD resolution – 18 vs 13 FPS
  • 34% higher maximum theoretical performance (3.9 vs 2.9 TFLOPS)
  • Achieves 61% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (36K vs 22K)
  • Has 75% more shading units (896 vs 512)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
41
21
17
9
46
26
21
10
The Witcher 3
19
19
9
-
37
29
22
10
Counter-Strike 2
35
23
19
-
40
28
22
-
Far Cry 6
32
24
19
-
34
28
23
11
Hogwarts Legacy
15
12
-
-
19
11
-
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
28
24
17
10
29
27
20
11
Ghost of Tsushima
19
11
9
-
22
14
11
-
Cyberpunk 2077
14
16
9
-
21
16
11
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
26
23
14
-
34
32
20
13
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 25 31
1080p Ultra 19 23
1440p Ultra 13 18
4K Ultra - 9
Margin of Error Low Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Arc 130T +41%
2904
Time Spy 2372 3409
Solar Bay 9378 12704
Port Royal 975 1902
Fire Strike 7074 8001
Wild Life Extreme 4630 5990
Night Raid 29486 36940
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
22589
Arc 130T +61%
36282
Background Blur 57.8 img/sec 70.9 img/sec
Face Detection 28.7 img/sec 34.9 img/sec
Horizon Detection 0.8 Gpixels/sec 1.13 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 1 Gpixels/sec 1.42 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 0.82 Gpixels/sec 1.96 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.29 Gpixels/sec 0.45 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 85.4 Gpixels/sec 131.5 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 2844.5 FPS 7360.9 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
Arc 130T +15%
6114
G2D Mark 890 791
DirectX 11 52 FPS 42 FPS
DirectX 12 25 FPS 27 FPS
GPU Compute 2838 Ops/s 2620 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6] – 2585 & 360 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
237.24
Arc 130T +155%
604.09
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 37 & 10 samples

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
8097
7262
GB6 ML Half Precision
11246
9964
GB6 ML Quantized
6004
5008
Image Classification (SP) 3449 3978
Image Segmentation (HP) 4098 8374
Image Super Resolution (Q) 7937 5792
Face Detection (HP) 12168 13023
Pose Estimation (Q) 29915 16149
Text Classification (SP) 2571 1356
Machine Translation (HP) 3852 2594
Object Detection (SP) 2687 4754
Depth Estimation (Q) 14163 12040
Style Transfer (SP) 59966 51653
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon 760M and Intel Arc 130T

General

Vendor Amd Intel
Build Integrated Integrated
Released January 4, 2023 January 6, 2025
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Generic
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture RDNA 3.0 Xe+
GPU Codename Phoenix Arrow Lake iGPU
Rival Equivalent - Intel Arc iGPU (4-Cores) - Radeon 840M
Successor - Radeon 8040S -
Recommended CPU - AMD Ryzen 5 7640U or above - Intel Core Ultra 5 225H or above
Used in CPUs - AMD Ryzen 5 230
- AMD Ryzen 5 240
- AMD Ryzen 5 8600G
- AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS
- AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS
- AMD Ryzen 5 8640U
- AMD Ryzen 5 7640U
- AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS
- Intel Core Ultra 5 225H
Laptop GPU ranking (112th and 100th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 800 MHz 300 MHz
Boost Clock 2600-2800 MHz (configurable) 2200 MHz
Shading Units 512 896
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 32 56
Render Output Units (ROPs) 16 28
Compute Units (Pipelines) 8 7
Tensor Cores - 112
Ray-tracing Cores 6 7
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster -
L2 Cache 2MB shared 4MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 42-45 GPixel/s 62 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 83-90 GTexel/s 123 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
2.7-2.9 TFLOPS
Arc 130T +34%
3.9 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 15 W 35 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 4 nm 5 nm
Die Size 178 mm² -
Transistor Count 25.4 billion -
Transistor Density 142.7 MTr/mm² -
Max. Temperature - 110°C

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared

API

DirectX 12 12.2
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.1 3.0
CUDA - No
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No
DisplayPort 2.1 2.1

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
1 (16.7%)
5 (83.3%)
Total votes: 6

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!