Radeon RX 6600M vs Radeon 780M

We performed a head-to-head comparison of the Radeon RX 6600M 8 GB with 28 pipelines and 1792 shaders against the 1 year and 8 months newer Radeon 780M that utilizes 12 pipelines and 768 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of Radeon 780M over RX 6600M
Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 6600M
  • Performs significantly better (up to 2.6x) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • Shows 3.1x higher average frame rate in modern games at QHD resolution – 49 vs 16 FPS
  • Includes 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory
  • 81% higher maximum theoretical performance (7.8 vs 4.3 TFLOPS)
  • Achieves 2.2x more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (71K vs 32K)
  • Has 2.3x more shading units (1792 vs 768)
Reasons to consider the Radeon 780M
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 4 nm process technology

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
113
60
50
31
52
26
22
11
The Witcher 3
98
78
53
30
26
26
13
-
Counter-Strike 2
161
110
78
37
44
31
21
9
Far Cry 6
87
75
57
28
39
29
21
10
Hogwarts Legacy
56
45
33
17
22
15
11
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
75
69
45
31
34
29
19
12
Ghost of Tsushima
60
49
35
19
21
15
10
-
Cyberpunk 2077
58
51
29
13
19
20
10
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
103
90
61
31
36
31
20
9
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 90 33
1080p Ultra 70 25
1440p Ultra 49 16
4K Ultra 26 -
Margin of Error Low Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
RX 6600M +163%
7010
Time Spy 8006 2787
Solar Bay 29953 11525
Port Royal 3880 1579
Fire Strike 23177 7885
Wild Life Extreme 14422 5305
Night Raid 94761 33367
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
RX 6600M +117%
71125
32713
Background Blur 176.1 img/sec 86.4 img/sec
Face Detection 102.4 img/sec 35.8 img/sec
Horizon Detection 2.19 Gpixels/sec 1.03 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 3.1 Gpixels/sec 1.36 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 2.8 Gpixels/sec 1.41 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.78 Gpixels/sec 0.41 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 313.2 Gpixels/sec 132.4 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 8768.9 FPS 4470.7 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Cinebench 2024 GPU

Hardware benchmark using Maxon's Cinema 4D rendering engine
Cinebench 2024 GPU

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
RX 6600M +104%
13784
G2D Mark 722 885
DirectX 11 136 FPS 65 FPS
DirectX 12 51 FPS 30 FPS
GPU Compute 5566 Ops/s 3577 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6] – 1025 & 12072 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
RX 6600M +244%
902.36
262.58
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 97 & 179 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Radeon RX 6600M
No benchmark results yet
Radeon 780M
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-08-17 -> RennsportGeekbench 6 OpenCL32197
📘 2026-02-26 (iFraan)Geekbench 6 OpenCL28558

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
RX 6600M +54%
14016
GB6 ML Half Precision
RX 6600M +22%
16471
13510
GB6 ML Quantized
RX 6600M +63%
11065
Image Classification (SP) 6355 3860
Image Segmentation (HP) 7183 5435
Image Super Resolution (Q) 16962 10580
Face Detection (HP) 20793 12855
Pose Estimation (Q) 65012 34716
Text Classification (SP) 2139 2578
Machine Translation (HP) 3411 3897
Object Detection (SP) 5102 3078
Depth Estimation (Q) 26194 14989
Style Transfer (SP) 139748 78608
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon RX 6600M and Radeon 780M

General

Vendor Amd Amd
Build Discrete Integrated
Released June 1, 2021 January 4, 2023
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Gaming Generic
Segment Mid-range Mid-range
Architecture RDNA 2.0 RDNA 3.0
GPU Codename Navi 23 Phoenix
Rival Equivalent - GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop - Intel Arc iGPU (8-Cores)
Successor - - Radeon 8050S
Recommended CPU - AMD Ryzen 5 5600H or above - AMD Ryzen 7 7840U or above
Used in CPUs - - AMD Ryzen 7 H 255
- AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS
- AMD Ryzen 7 250
- AMD Ryzen 7 260
- AMD Ryzen 9 270
- AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
- AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
- AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
- and 6 more
Laptop GPU ranking (74th and 98th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 1489 MHz 800 MHz
Boost Clock 1520-2177 MHz (configurable) 2700-2800 MHz (configurable)
Shading Units 1792 768
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 112 48
Render Output Units (ROPs) 64 32
Compute Units (Pipelines) 28 12
Ray-tracing Cores 28 12
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster 128KB per cluster
L2 Cache 2MB shared 2MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 97-139 GPixel/s 86-90 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 170-244 GTexel/s 130-134 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
RX 6600M +81%
5.4-7.8 TFLOPS
4.1-4.3 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 50-100 W (configurable) 15 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 7 nm 4 nm
Die Size 237 mm² 178 mm²
Transistor Count 11.06 billion 25.4 billion
Transistor Density 46.67 MTr/mm² 142.7 MTr/mm²

Memory

Memory Type GDDR6 System Shared
Memory Size 8 GB -
Memory Clock 1750 MHz -
Effective Memory Speed 14000 Mbps -
Bus 128-bit -
ECC No -
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.2 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.1 2.1
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No
DisplayPort 1.4 2.1

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
4 (66.7%)
2 (33.3%)
Total votes: 6

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!