AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT vs RX 6800
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
Navi 32
AMD Radeon RX 6800
Navi 21
We compared two discrete desktop gaming GPUs: the Radeon RX 7800 XT with 3840 shaders against the 2 years and 11 months older RX 6800 that utilizes 3840 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.
Review
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score
Value for money (Beta)
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 7800 XT
- Performs better (up to 25%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
- 2.3x higher maximum theoretical performance (37.3 vs 16.2 TFLOPS)
- Manufactured using a more efficient 5 nm process technology
- Shows 20% higher average frame rate in modern games at QHD resolution – 115 vs 96 FPS
- Has 22% higher memory bandwidth: 624.1 vs 512 GB/s
Gaming Performance
Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutionsGames
| Forza Horizon 5 | 197 135 111 86 |
175 114 95 66 |
| The Witcher 3 | 205 174 132 66 |
172 148 108 57 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 297 206 147 80 |
265 193 131 75 |
| Far Cry 6 | 166 145 124 77 |
146 129 106 61 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 122 101 79 45 |
106 86 68 36 |
| CoD: Modern Warfare III | 169 168 122 80 |
146 135 97 63 |
| Ghost of Tsushima | 124 105 85 54 |
110 89 70 43 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 132 121 80 39 |
113 98 65 32 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 212 199 151 77 |
179 168 122 63 |
| 1080p High | 180 | 157 |
| 1080p Ultra | 150 | 129 |
| 1440p Ultra | 115 | 96 |
| 4K Ultra | 67 | 55 |
| Margin of Error | Low | Low |
Benchmarks
Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps3D Mark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
| Time Spy | 20095 | 16227 |
| Solar Bay | 80667 | 64715 |
| Port Royal | 10917 | 8145 |
| Fire Strike | 50073 | 44367 |
| Wild Life Extreme | 37173 | 29767 |
| Night Raid | 160762 | 142456 |
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
GB6 Compute Score
| Background Blur | 300.7 img/sec | 298.6 img/sec |
| Face Detection | 200.5 img/sec | 186.2 img/sec |
| Horizon Detection | 5.77 Gpixels/sec | 4.75 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge Detection | 8.05 Gpixels/sec | 6.68 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 6.44 Gpixels/sec | 5.58 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature Matching | 1.25 Gpixels/sec | 1.16 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 566.4 Gpixels/sec | 579 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle Physics | 20533.6 FPS | 18755.1 FPS |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
Cinebench 2024 GPU
Cinebench 2024 GPU
Passmark Graphics
G3D Mark Score
| G2D Mark | 1194 | 1002 |
| DirectX 11 | 250 FPS | 211 FPS |
| DirectX 12 | 96 FPS | 90 FPS |
| GPU Compute | 13608 Ops/s | 10751 Ops/s |
Blender
Blender GPU
Recent User Tests
Radeon RX 7800 XT
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-06-03 (RekrutV) | GeekBench | 156177 |
| 📘 2026-06-03 (RekrutV) | Steel Nomad Light | 19225 |
| 📘 2026-05-14 (RekrutV) | GeekBench | 152506 |
| 📘 2026-05-14 (RekrutV) | Steel Nomad Light | 18724 |
Radeon RX 6800
No benchmark results yet
Artificial Intelligence Tests
Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasksGeekBench 6 ML
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
| Image Classification (SP) | 13913 | 11245 |
| Image Segmentation (HP) | 18416 | 13617 |
| Image Super Resolution (Q) | 31387 | 27747 |
| Face Detection (HP) | 51780 | 38124 |
| Pose Estimation (Q) | 177217 | 119493 |
| Text Classification (SP) | 3655 | 2425 |
| Machine Translation (HP) | 6216 | 5228 |
| Object Detection (SP) | 15073 | 11986 |
| Depth Estimation (Q) | 57318 | 46083 |
| Style Transfer (SP) | 347420 | 281860 |
| Framework | ONNX | ONNX |
| Backend | DirectML | DirectML |
Specifications
Technical specifications of Radeon RX 7800 XT and RX 6800General
| Vendor | Amd | Amd |
| Build | Discrete | Discrete |
| Released | September 6, 2023 | October 28, 2020 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | $579 |
| Case | Desktop | Desktop |
| Purpose | Gaming | Gaming |
| Segment | High-end | High-end |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| GPU Codename | Navi 32 | Navi 21 |
| Rival Equivalent | - GeForce RTX 4070 | - GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
| Successor | - Radeon RX 9070 XT | - |
| Recommended CPU | - Intel Core i5 13600K or above | - Intel Core i5 12600 or above |
Desktop GPU rating (25th and 38th place)
Graphics Processing Unit
| Base Clock | 1295 MHz | 1700 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 2430 MHz | 2105 MHz |
| Shading Units | 3840 | 3840 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) | 240 | 240 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs) | 96 | 96 |
| Tensor Cores | - | No |
| Ray-tracing Cores | 60 | 60 |
| L1 Cache | 128KB per cluster | 128KB per cluster |
| L2 Cache | 4MB shared | 4MB shared |
| Instructions Per Cycle | 4 IPC | 2 IPC |
Raw Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 233 GPixel/s | 202 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 583 GTexel/s | 505 GTexel/s |
FLOPS (FP32)
Differences in GPUs' instructions per clock make TFLOPS values not directly comparable.
Physical
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| TGP | 263 W | 250 W |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Fabrication Process | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Die Size | 346 mm² | 520 mm² |
| Transistor Count | 28 billion | 26 billion |
| Transistor Density | 80.92 MTr/mm² | 50 MTr/mm² |
Memory
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Size | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Clock | 2438 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Effective Memory Speed | 19500 Mbps | 16000 Mbps |
| Bus | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| ECC | No | No |
Memory Bandwidth
API
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.2 | 2.1 |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS | No | No |
| DisplayPort | 2.1 | 1.4a |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 12