Home > Laptop comparison > Predator Triton 500 SE or Predator Helios 300 (PH315-53) – what's better?

Acer Predator Triton 500 SE vs Helios 300 (PH315-53)

51 out of 100
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE
VS
42 out of 100
Acer Predator Helios 300 (PH315-53)
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE
Acer Predator Helios 300 (PH315-53)
Please select specific configurations for the laptops to get a more accurate comparative review
Display 2560 x 1600
CPU Intel Core i9 11900H
GPU
RAM
Storage

Review

Evaluation of Acer Predator Triton 500 SE and Helios 300 (PH315-53) important characteristics
Performance
System and application performance
Gaming
Performance in popular 3D games
Display
Viewing angle, color accuracy, brightness
Battery Life
Potential battery life in light and average use
Connectivity
Ports, webcam and other interfaces
Portability
Design, materials, durability and usability
NanoReview Score
Pick the usage scenario that best matches your needs
Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

Please input up-to-date prices for the selected laptop configurations to get an accurate value-for-money index.
Currency
VS
24.2
(Mediocre)
Value Index
23.1
(Mediocre)

Key Differences

What are the key differences between the notebooks
Advantages of the Acer Predator Triton 500 SE
  • Higher screen refresh rate: 165 versus 144 Hz
  • Around 2.5x better multi-core CPU performance in the Cinebench 2024 test
  • Higher number of cutting-edge USB Type-C ports: 2 versus 1
  • Thinner bezels and 9% higher screen-to-body ratio
  • Provides 317% higher max. screen brightness: 1250 vs 300 nits
  • 34% sharper screen – 189 versus 141 pixels per inch (PPI)

Tests and Specifications

Comparison table of test results and technical specs
Laptop:
Predator Triton 500 SE
vs
Predator Helios 300 (PH315-53)

Case

Weight 2.44 kg (5.38 lbs) 2.5 kg (5.51 lbs)
Dimensions 358.1 x 261.6 x 19.9 mm
14.1 x 10.3 x 0.78 inches		 363.4 x 255 x 22.9 mm
14.31 x 10.04 x 0.9 inches
Area 937 cm2 (145.2 inches2) 927 cm2 (143.7 inches2)
Screen-to-body ratio ~79.2% ~72.4%
Side bezels 6.8 mm 9 mm
Colors Gray Black
Material Aluminum Top: Aluminum
Middle: Aluminum
Bottom: Plastic
Transformer No No
Size comparison
Cooling solution
Cooling system Active Active
Vapor chamber No No
Number of fans 3 2
Noise level (max. load) - 51 dB

Display

Size 16 inches 15.6 inches
Type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Refresh rate 165 Hz 144 Hz
PPI 189 ppi 141 ppi
Aspect ratio 16:10 16:9
Resolution 2560 x 1600 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels
HDR support No No
Sync technology G-Sync -
Touchscreen No No
Coating Matte Matte
Ambient light sensor - No
Screen space comparison
Predator Triton 500 SE
16″ (16:10 ratio) = 115.1 in2
Predator Helios 300 (PH315-53)
15.6″ (16:9 ratio) = 104 in2
~10% more screen space
Display tests
Contrast - 1000:1
sRGB color space 100% -
Max. brightness

Battery

Capacity
Battery type Li-Ion Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Fast charging Yes Yes
Charging via USB (Power Delivery) - No
Charging port position Left Bottom
Charge power 230 W 230 W
Weight of AC adapter - 600 grams

CPU

CPU name
Base frequency 2.1-2.5 GHz 2.5 GHz
Turbo frequency 4.9 GHz 4.5 GHz
Cores 8 4
Threads 16 8
L3 Cache 24 MB 8 MB
Integrated GPU Intel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (32 EU) Intel UHD Graphics 630
Fabrication process 10 nm 14 nm

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi-Core)
Submit your benchmark results

Graphics Card

GPU name
TGP 105 W 100 W
Nvidia Optimus MUX Yes
Type Dedicated Dedicated
Fabrication process 8 nm 8 nm
GPU base clock 1305 MHz 1267 MHz
GPU boost clock 1642 MHz 1605 MHz
FLOPS 12.6 TFLOPS 12.3 TFLOPS
Memory size 6 GB 6 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory bus 192 bit 192 bit
Memory speed 14 Gbps 14 Gbps
Shading units (cores) 3840 3840
Texture mapping units (TMUs) 120 120
Raster operations pipelines (ROPs) 48 48
GPU performance 12.6 TFLOPS 12.3 TFLOPS

GPU Benchmarks

Steel Nomad Lite Score
Blender GPU 2315 2358
Solar Bay 35497 35446
Expected FPS based on average performance across 9 popular games. Details
Add your GPU benchmark result

RAM

RAM size
Channels 1x8 GB 2x8 GB
Clock 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Type DDR4 DDR4
Upgradable Yes Yes
Total slots 1 2
Max. ram size 32 GB 64 GB

Storage

Storage size
Bus PCI-E Gen 3.0 (4x) PCI-E Gen 3.0 (4x)
Storage type SSD (M2) SSD (M2)
Channels 1x512 GB 1x512 GB
Upgradable Yes Yes
Total slots 1 2
NVMe Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers 2.0 2.0
Dolby Atmos - No
Loudness - ~81 dB
Microphones 2 2

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard v6 v6
Bluetooth v5.1 v5
Fingerprint Yes No
Infrared sensor - No
Optical drive No No
Webcam Above the display Above the display
Webcam resolution - 1280 x 720
Ports
USB-A 2x USB 3.2 2x USB 3.2
USB Type-C 2x USB 3.2 1x USB 3.2
Thunderbolt Thunderbolt 4 No
HDMI 1x HDMI 2.1 1x HDMI 2.0
DisplayPort No 1x v1.4
VGA No No
Audio jack (3.5 mm) Yes Yes
Ethernet (RJ45) No Yes
SD card reader Yes No
Proprietary charging port Yes Yes

Input

Keyboard
Keyboard type Island Island
Numpad No Yes
Backlight Yes Yes
Touchpad
Surface - Plastic
Windows Precision Yes Yes
*Disclaimer! Ports, speakers, display, and other specifications can vary depending on the laptop's specific configuration or region.

Cast your vote

So, which laptop would you choose?
10 (83.3%)
2 (16.7%)
Total votes: 12

Related Comparisons

1. Acer Predator Helios 300 (PH315-53) vs Asus ROG Strix G15 G513
2. Acer Predator Helios 300 (PH315-53) vs Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16” (AMD) (1)
3. Acer Predator Helios 300 (PH315-53) vs Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506
4. Acer Predator Helios 300 (PH315-53) vs Lenovo Legion 5 15" (2021, AMD)
5. Acer Predator Triton 500 SE vs Acer Predator Triton 300 SE (2021)
Compare other laptops (1100+)

Comments

Write your opinion about the comparison of Acer Predator Helios 300 (PH315-53) and Triton 500 SE or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
EnglishРусский