Honor 50 vs Honor 90
Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.57-inch Honor 50 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G) that was released on June 16, 2021, against the Honor 90, which is powered by Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 Accelerated Edition and came out 2 years after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Honor 50
- Shows 20% longer battery life (23:01 vs 19:10 hours)
Reasons to consider the Honor 90
- Delivers 58% higher peak brightness (1170 against 742 nits)
- Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
- Comes with 700 mAh larger battery capacity: 5000 vs 4300 mAh
- Has 33% more RAM: 8GB versus 6GB
- More recent OS version: Android 14 versus 13
- 11% higher pixel density (435 vs 392 PPI)
- The phone is 2 years newer
- The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
- Ready for eSIM technology
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | OLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.57 inches | 6.7 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels | 1200 x 2664 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.98:9 |
| PPI | 392 ppi | 435 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 525 nits | 1000 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 750 nits | 1600 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10 | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | 300 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7% | 90.4% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 100% | 99.7% |
| PWM | 120 Hz | 728 Hz |
| Response time | 2.4 ms | 1 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | ∞ Infinity |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | 161.9 mm (6.37 inches) |
| Width | 73.8 mm (2.91 inches) | 74.1 mm (2.92 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm (0.31 inches) | 7.8 mm (0.31 inches) |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 183 g (6.46 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | White, Black, Green, Red | Black, Silver, Blue, Green |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G | Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 Accelerated Edition |
| Max clock | 2400 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55) - 3 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78) - 1 core at 2.4 GHz: Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78) |
- 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A510 - 3 cores at 2.36 GHz: Cortex-A710 - 1 core at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A710 |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | Samsung |
| Lithography process | 6 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 770 | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Adreno 642L | Adreno 644 |
| GPU shading units | 512 | 768 |
| GPU clock | 550 MHz | 443 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~563.2 GFLOPS | ~680.4 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 2132 | 2963 |
| Single-core score | 1025 | 1110 |
| Multi-core score | 3011 | 2968 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 307838 | 324311 |
| GPU | 99708 | 119050 |
| Memory | 157428 | 174797 |
| UX | 235703 | 255415 |
| Total score | 800677 | 873573 |
| Samples | [2 tests] | [8 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | - | 98% |
| Graphics test | - | 2 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 276 |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Graphics test | - | 5 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 857 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | - | 10439 |
| Video editing | - | 7300 |
| Photo editing | - | 27068 |
| Data manipulation | - | 9185 |
| Writing score | - | 11979 |
Recent User Tests
Honor 50
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-20 (Carlos) | AnTuTu 12 | 858274 |
| 📘 2026-04-08 (Dako086) | AnTuTu 11 | 800677 |
| 📘 2025-11-23 -> Yoyska | AnTuTu 11 | 751019 |
| 📘 2024-05-18 (hailoon) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 2132 |
| 📘 2024-05-18 (hailoon) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 1025 / 3011 |
Honor 90
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-06 (STEVEN MP) | AnTuTu 11 | 920942 |
| 📘 2026-08-23 (Zamorokk) | AnTuTu 11 | 886048 |
| 📘 2026-05-10 (Damon) | AnTuTu 11 | 805921 |
| 📘 2026-04-01 (MrVolt) | AnTuTu 11 | 836065 |
| 📘 2026-02-19 (Zhiger) | AnTuTu 11 | 876570 |
Memory
| RAM size | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 11 (Can be upgraded to Android 13) | Android 13 (Can be upgraded to Android 14) |
| ROM | Magic UI 7.1 | MagicOS 8.0 |
| OS size | 21 GB | 23 GB |
Battery
| Capacity | 4300 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 66 W | 66 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (61% in 30 min) | Yes (80% in 35 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:54 hr | 1:12 hr |
| Web browsing | 09:06 hr | 08:26 hr |
| Watching video | 12:48 hr | 11:56 hr |
| Gaming | 05:24 hr | 04:40 hr |
| Standby | 118 hr | 84 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 108 megapixels | 200 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 12032 x 9024 | 16256 x 12192 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 240 FPS (720p) | 960 FPS (720p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 120° | 112° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 108 MP 2) Ultrawide: 8 MP 3) Macro: 2 MP 4) Depth: 2 MP |
1) Standard: 200 MP 2) Ultrawide: 12 MP 3) Depth: 2 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 108 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KHM2 | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.52" (≈ 0.66 inch) | 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.7 micron | 0.56 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 17 mm | - |
| Sensor size | 1/4" (≈ 0.25 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | - | 1.12 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Image resolution | 2 MP | - |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | - |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | - | 60 |
| Preview | - | 64 |
| Zoom | - | 86 |
| Samples | - | Photo samples of Honor 90 from DxOMark |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 6528 x 4896 | 8160 x 6112 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | - |
| Focal length | 22 mm | - |
| Sensor | Samsung JD1 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/3.14" (≈ 0.32 inch) | - |
| Autofocus | No | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | - |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC, SBAS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | 18 | 18 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | Mono |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | June 2021 | May 2023 |
| Release date | June 2021 | June 2023 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $350 | $499 |
| Successor | - | - Honor 500 Pro |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 66 W | Yes, 66 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Honor 90 is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 257
Related comparisons
4.
Honor 90 vs Honor X9b (2)