Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra vs Note 9
70
out of 100
VS
48
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.8-inch Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (with Exynos 2200) that was released on February 9, 2022, against the Samsung Galaxy Note 9, which is powered by Exynos 9 Octa 9810 and came out 3 years and 7 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
- The rear camera has a 10x optical zoom
- 2.4x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1434K versus 606K)
- Higher display refresh rate – 120 Hz
- Better camera quality (According to DxOMark rating)
- Delivers 91% higher peak brightness (1266 against 663 nits)
- Comes with 1000 mAh larger battery capacity: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
- Shows 19% longer battery life (23:05 vs 19:26 hours)
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.2)
- Supports higher wattage charging (45W versus 15W)
- Has a 0.4 inch larger screen size
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 10
- More energy-efficient CPU – Exynos 2200
- Uses a faster type of memory: LPDDR5
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Note 9
- Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 512GB
- Weighs 27 grams less
- Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Size | 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3088 pixels | 1440 x 2960 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.3:9 | 18.5:9 |
| PPI | 500 ppi | 514 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (24-120 Hz) | No |
| Max rated brightness | 830 nits | 520 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 1750 nits | - |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10 |
| Screen protection | Gorilla Glass Victus Plus | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.8% | 84% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- Always-On Display |
| RGB color space | 98.2% | 144.6% |
| PWM | 120 Hz | 227 Hz |
| Response time | 1 ms | 8 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | ∞ Infinity |
Screen space comparison
Galaxy S22 Ultra
6.8″ (19.3:9 ratio) = 17.7 in2
Galaxy Note 9
6.4″ (18.5:9 ratio) = 16.1 in2
~9% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 163.3 mm (6.43 inches) | 161.9 mm (6.37 inches) |
| Width | 77.9 mm (3.07 inches) | 76.4 mm (3.01 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm (0.35 inches) | 8.8 mm (0.35 inches) |
| Weight | 228 g (8.04 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP68 | IP68 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | - |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Black, Gray, Blue, Green, Red | Black, Blue, Brown |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, rear |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9810 |
| Max clock | 2800 MHz | 2700 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.82 GHz: Cortex-A510 - 3 cores at 2.52 GHz: Cortex-A710 - 1 core at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-X2 |
- 4 cores at 1.9 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 4 cores at 2.9 GHz: Exynos M3 |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | - |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | Samsung |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 10 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Xclipse 920 | Mali-G72MP18 |
| GPU shading units | 384 | 216 |
| GPU clock | 1306 MHz | 572 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~1003 GFLOPS | ~247.1 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | - | 4340 |
| Single-core score | 1648 | 683 |
| Multi-core score | 4351 | 1853 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 472427 | 246972 |
| GPU | 390230 | 93460 |
| Memory | 216173 | 127081 |
| UX | 355339 | 139080 |
| Total score | 1434169 | 606593 |
| Samples | [17 tests] | [4 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 66% | - |
| Graphics test | 7 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 900 | - |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Stability | 65% | - |
| Graphics test | 15 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 18 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 15 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 12 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 3874 | - |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Stability | 66% | - |
| Graphics test | 11 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 1967 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 13423 | 5745 |
| Video editing | 7399 | 5461 |
| Photo editing | 24771 | 9629 |
| Data manipulation | 12643 | 5819 |
| Writing score | 16337 | 6229 |
Recent User Tests
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-07-21 (RAID_0) | GeekBench GPU | 10479 |
| 📘 2026-07-12 (João_Rosário_67) | AnTuTu | 1474557 |
| 📘 2026-06-09 (Unknown) | AnTuTu | 1318666 |
| 📘 2026-04-18 (Fsoceinty) | AnTuTu | 1329673 |
| 📘 2026-03-28 (Bakzhan) | AnTuTu | 1530447 |
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-06-16 (PatrickVN) | AnTuTu | 606593 |
| 📘 2026-05-31 (Fermallow) | GeekBench CPU | 676 / 2002 |
| 📘 2026-05-31 (Fermallow) | AnTuTu | 629687 |
| 📘 2025-10-16 (Tuâns 🇻🇳) | AnTuTu | 591549 |
| 📘 2025-10-11 (OnionTails) | AnTuTu | 594285 |
Memory
| RAM size | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | - | 1794 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card | No | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | - | Up to 512 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 12 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) | Android 8.1 (Can be upgraded to Android 10) |
| ROM | One UI 8.0 | One UI 2.5 |
| OS size | 26.8 GB | 19 GB |
| OS updates | 4 years | - |
| Security updates | 5 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 5000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 45 W | 15 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (15 W) | Yes, Qi/PMA (15 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | No |
| Bypass charging | No | - |
| Fast charging | Yes (60% in 30 min) | Yes, Samsung Adaptive Fast Charge (50% in 35 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:59 hr | 1:40 hr |
| Web browsing | 09:06 hr | 07:31 hr |
| Watching video | 13:47 hr | 11:36 hr |
| Gaming | 05:57 hr | 05:01 hr |
| Standby | 113 hr | 96 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 108 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 12000 x 9000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Zoom | Optical, 10x | Optical, 2x |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 24FPS | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 120FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 960 FPS (720p) | 960 FPS (720p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 120° | - |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 108 MP 2) Telephoto: 10 MP 3) Telephoto: 10 MP 4) Ultrawide: 12 MP |
1) Standard: 12 MP 2) Telephoto: 12 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Image resolution | 108 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.5 - 2.4 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KHM3 | Samsung SAK2L3 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.33" (≈ 0.75 inch) | 1/2.55" (≈ 0.39 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | 1.4 micron |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 10 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/4.9 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 230 mm | 52 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX574 | Samsung |
| Sensor size | 1/3.52" (≈ 0.28 inch) | 1/3.4" (≈ 0.29 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | 1 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 12 MP | - |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | - |
| Focal length | 13 mm | - |
| Sensor | Sony IMX563 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/2.55" (≈ 0.39 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.4 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | - |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | 70 | - |
| Preview | 73 | - |
| Zoom | 141 | - |
| Samples | Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra from DxOMark | Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy Note 9 from DxOMark |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 40 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 7864 x 5200 | 3264 x 2448 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 25 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | Samsung S5K3H1 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.82" (≈ 0.35 inch) | 1/3.6" (≈ 0.28 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.7 micron | 1.22 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 1440p at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
DxOMark front camera
| Photo | 139 | - |
| Video | 145 | - |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, LE, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.1 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes, DP 1.2 | - |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | Yes |
| LTE Cat* | 20 | 18 |
| 5G support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | Yes |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | February 2022 | August 2018 |
| Release date | March 2022 | August 2018 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1199 | $1000 |
| Successor | - | - Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
| SAR (head) | 1.05 W/kg | 0.381 W/kg |
| SAR (body) | 1.58 W/kg | 1.509 W/kg |
| Sensors | - Hall-effect sensor - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Hall-effect sensor - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Not included | - |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 284
