Vivo X200 Ultra vs X100 Ultra

88 out of 100
Vivo X200 Ultra
VS
81 out of 100
Vivo X100 Ultra

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.82-inch Vivo X200 Ultra (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite) that was released on April 21, 2025, against the Vivo X100 Ultra, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and came out 1 year before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200 Ultra
  • 35% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3092K versus 2294K)
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
  • The phone is 1 year newer
  • Supports higher wattage charging (90W versus 80W)
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 4.0
  • 41% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2979 and 2119 points
Reasons to consider the Vivo X100 Ultra
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS

Review

Evaluation of Vivo X200 Ultra and X100 Ultra crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
37.3
(Mediocre)
Value Index
41.7
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.82 inches 6.78 inches
Resolution 1440 x 3168 pixels 1440 x 3200 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.8:9 20:9
PPI 510 ppi 517 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1800 nits -
Max rated brightness in HDR 4500 nits 3000 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate - 300 Hz
Screen protection Armor glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 90.3% 89.5%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 99.9% -
PWM 121 Hz -
Response time 2 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Peak brightness test (auto)
1834 nits
1811 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 163.14 mm (6.42 inches) 164.1 mm (6.46 inches)
Width 76.76 mm (3.02 inches) 75.6 mm (2.98 inches)
Thickness 8.69 mm (0.34 inches) 9.2 mm (0.36 inches)
Weight 229 g (8.08 oz) 229 g (8.08 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Silver, Red White, Gray
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio
90.3%
89.5%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo X200 Ultra and Vivo X100 Ultra
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Max clock 4320 MHz 3300 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
- 2 cores at 2.27 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 2 cores at 2.96 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3.15 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4
L3 cache 8 MB 12 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Adreno 830 Adreno 750
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1100 MHz 903-1000 MHz
FLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS ~2774 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo X200 Ultra and Vivo X100 Ultra
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
X200 Ultra +41%
2979
2119
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
X200 Ultra +44%
9353
6486
Compute Score (GPU)
X200 Ultra +71%
24604
14403
Compute Score (GPU) 24604 14403
Single-core score 2979 2119
Multi-core score 9353 6486
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
X200 Ultra +35%
3092340
2294102
CPU 819790 695131
GPU 1185591 685799
Memory 429927 402587
UX 657032 510585
Total score 3092340 2294102
Samples [11 tests] Less than 3
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
X200 Ultra +56%
2561
1642
Stability 50% 83%
Graphics test 19 FPS 12 FPS
Graphics score 2561 1642
3DMark Solar Bay
X200 Ultra +45%
11897
8230
Graphics test 45 FPS 31 FPS
Section 1 51 FPS 35 FPS
Section 2 46 FPS 32 FPS
Section 3 39 FPS 27 FPS
Graphics score 11897 8230
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Stability - 76%
Graphics test - 28 FPS
Graphics score - 4738
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
X200 Ultra +17%
16679
14201
Web score 15343 10974
Video editing 7121 6450
Photo editing 35679 33109
Data manipulation 14476 12481
Writing score 21329 18970
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (83rd and 185th place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Vivo X200 Ultra
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-08-01 (Tt_murco730)AnTuTu3172230
📘 2026-06-07 (L_8888)AnTuTu3074394
📘 2026-06-02 (Obsessed)AnTuTu3179659
📘 2026-05-15 (Хзшник)AnTuTu3172230
📘 2026-03-29 (Tijet)AnTuTu3033519
Vivo X100 Ultra
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2025-01-12 (kyroskoh)GeekBench GPU14403
📘 2025-01-12 (kyroskoh)GeekBench CPU2119 / 6486

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz 4200 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 15)
ROM OriginOS 6 OriginOS 5
OS updates - 3 years
Security updates - 3 years

Battery

Capacity 6000 mAh 5500 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 80 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (40 W) Yes (30 W)
Reverse charging Yes Yes
Bypass charging Yes -
Fast charging Yes (64% in 30 min) Yes (65% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:49 hr 0:48 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing 12:14 hr 10:19 hr
Watching video 14:52 hr 14:26 hr
Gaming 06:38 hr 05:35 hr
Standby 95 hr 99 hr
General battery life
24:25 hr
22:58 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 3.7x Optical, 3.7x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 120FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 960 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 116° 116°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 200 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 200 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.7 f/1.8
Focal length 35 mm 23 mm
Sensor Sony LYT-818 Sony LYT-900
Sensor size 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) 1/0.98" (≈ 1.02 inch)
Pixel size 1.22 micron 1.6 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Laser autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 200 MP 200 MP
Aperture f/2.3 f/2.7
Focal length 85 mm 85 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL HP9 Samsung ISOCELL HP9
Sensor size 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch)
Pixel size 0.56 micron 0.56 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.2
Focal length 14 mm 14 mm
Sensor Sony LYT-818 Sony LYT-600
Sensor size 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) 1/2.0" (≈ 0.5 inch)
Pixel size 1.22 micron 0.7 micron
Stabilization Optical Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh 175 -
Zoom 159 -
Samples Photo samples of Vivo X200 Ultra from DxOMark -

Selfie camera

Megapixels 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/2.5 f/2.5
Focal length 24 mm 24 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL JN1 -
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus -
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
87.4 dB

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced April 2025 May 2024
Release date April 2025 May 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $1099 $900
Successor - - Vivo X200 Ultra
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 80 W Yes, 80 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo X200 Ultra is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
165 (60.9%)
106 (39.1%)
Total votes: 271

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!