Home > Smartphone comparison > Vivo X200 vs Magic 7 – which one to choose?

Vivo X200 vs Honor Magic 7

81 out of 100
Vivo X200
VS
85 out of 100
Honor Magic 7
Vivo X200
Honor Magic 7

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.67-inch Vivo X200 (with MediaTek Dimensity 9400) that was released on October 14, 2024, against the Honor Magic 7, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory
  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery life
  6. Camera
  7. Comments

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Honor Magic 7
  • Handles wireless charging up to 80W
  • Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 90W)
  • 16% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3132 and 2693 points

Review

Evaluation of Vivo X200 and Honor Magic 7 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Vivo X200
81*
Magic 7
83*
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Vivo X200
81*
Magic 7
85*
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
56.3
(Average)
Value Index
44.3
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
Vivo X200
vs
Magic 7

Display

Type AMOLED OLED
Size 6.67 inches 6.78 inches
Resolution 1260 x 2800 pixels 1264 x 2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 19.5:9
PPI 460 ppi 453 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness in HDR 4500 nits 5000 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 300 Hz 360 Hz
Screen protection Schott Xensation Alpha Rhino Glass
Screen-to-body ratio 89.6% 91.9%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Peak brightness test (auto)
Vivo X200
1574 nits
Magic 7
n/a

Design and build

Height 160.27 mm (6.31 inches) 162.1 mm (6.38 inches)
Width 74.81 mm (2.95 inches) 75.8 mm (2.98 inches)
Thickness 7.99 mm (0.31 inches) 8 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight 197 g (6.95 oz) 199 g (7.02 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass -
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Gray, Blue White, Black, Gold, Blue
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio
Vivo X200
89.6%
Magic 7 +3%
91.9%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo X200 and Honor Magic 7
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Max clock 3620 MHz 4320 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 1 core at 3.62 GHz: Cortex-X925		 - 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
L3 cache 12 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 890 Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Immortalis-G925 MC12 Adreno 830
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1612 MHz 1100 MHz
FLOPS ~4952.1 GFLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo X200 and Honor Magic 7
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Vivo X200
2693
Magic 7 +16%
3132
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Vivo X200
8706
Magic 7 +10%
9598
Compute Score (GPU)
Vivo X200
23954
Magic 7
n/a
Compute Score (GPU) 23954 -
Single-core score 2693 3132
Multi-core score 8706 9598
Sources: Geekbench [3]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
Vivo X200
2727422
Magic 7 +9%
2967184
CPU 849678 932482
GPU 932204 1156470
Memory 352736 358130
UX 592804 520102
Total score 2727422 2967184
Samples [7 tests] [3 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Vivo X200
2369
Magic 7 +4%
2460
Stability 64% 53%
Graphics test 18 FPS 18 FPS
Graphics score 2369 2460
3DMark Solar Bay
Vivo X200
10403
Magic 7 +11%
11519
Graphics test 40 FPS 44 FPS
Section 1 43 FPS 49 FPS
Section 2 40 FPS 44 FPS
Section 3 35 FPS 37 FPS
Graphics score 10403 11519
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Vivo X200
14338
Magic 7 +39%
19929
Web score 13478 23913
Video editing 5647 8032
Photo editing 28707 36496
Data manipulation 11877 17592
Writing score 23394 26385
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (145th and 128th place)
Submit your benchmark results

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Vivo X200
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-26 (Lancer)AnTuTu 122835451
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-25 (AZA_KEN)AnTuTu 112765026
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-12 (AKZ4R)AnTuTu 112759839
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-27 (Losty)AnTuTu 112661708
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-01 (Nguyeen)AnTuTu 112844416
Add View all (9)
Honor Magic 7
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-03 (Raim152)AnTuTu 112979186
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-28 (Ronti)AnTuTu 112967184
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-21 (reneval_da)AnTuTu 112961082
Add View all (3)

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5333 MHz 5300 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM Funtouch OS 16 MagicOS 10
OS updates 3 years 2 years
Security updates 3 years 3 years

Battery

Capacity 5800 mAh 5650 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 100 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No Yes (80 W)
Reverse charging Yes Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging Yes Yes
Fast charging Yes (78% in 30 min) Yes
Full charging time 0:39 hr -
Battery life tests
Web browsing 10:06 hr -
Watching video 15:50 hr -
Gaming 07:21 hr -
Standby 88 hr -
General battery life
Vivo X200
22:51 hr
Magic 7
n/a
Add your battery life

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 3x Optical, 3x
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 119Β° 122Β°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.6 f/1.9
Focal length 23 mm 24 mm
Sensor Sony IMX921 -
Sensor size 1/1.56" (β‰ˆ 0.64 inch) 1/1.3" (β‰ˆ 0.77 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 1.2 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.6 f/2.4
Focal length 70 mm 68 mm
Sensor Sony IMX882 -
Sensor size 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch) -
Pixel size 0.7 micron -
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 15 mm 12 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN1 -
Sensor size 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch) 1/2.88" (β‰ˆ 0.35 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron -
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 6528 x 4896 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 25 mm 22 mm
Sensor Samsung KD1 -
Sensor size 1/3.42" (β‰ˆ 0.29 inch) 1/2.93" (β‰ˆ 0.34 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.6 micron
Autofocus No -
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes, DP 1.2
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No -
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No -

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced October 2024 October 2024
Release date October 2024 November 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $549 $650
Successor - Vivo X500 - Honor Magic 9
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint		 - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Yes, 100 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Honor Magic 7. It has a better performance, battery life, connectivity, software, design, and sound.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
14 (40%)
21 (60%)
Total votes: 35

Related comparisons

1. Honor Magic 7 vs Honor 400 Pro
2. Honor Magic 7 vs Honor Magic 7 Pro (1)
3. Honor Magic 7 vs Xiaomi 15
4. Vivo X200 vs Samsung Galaxy S25
5. Vivo X200 vs Xiaomi 15
6. Vivo X200 vs Vivo X200 FE
7. Vivo X200 vs Vivo X300
8. Vivo X200 vs Vivo X200 Pro (1)
Compare other phones (860+)

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
EnglishРусский