Dimensity 810 vs Dimensity 800

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 810 (with Mali-G57 MP2 graphics) and Dimensity 800 (Mali-G57 MP4). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 810
  • Higher GPU frequency (~43%)
  • 20% higher CPU clock speed (2400 vs 2000 MHz)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (6 versus 7 nm)
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 800
  • Performs 40% better in floating-point computations
  • Shows better (up to 8%) AnTuTu 11 score – 612K vs 569K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
569913
612841
CPU 228631 253237
GPU 46684 84195
Memory 137506 103380
UX 157092 172029
Total score 569913 612841
Samples [4 tests] Less than 3

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
2221
Asset compression 93.2 MB/sec 111.1 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 49 pages/sec 56 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 70.2 Mpixels/sec 80.9 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 36.2 images/sec 41.6 images/sec
HDR 58.4 Mpixels/sec 64.2 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 5.45 images/sec 6.16 images/sec
Photo processing 20.2 images/sec 22.6 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.78 Mpixels/sec 3.37 Mpixels/sec
Samples Less than 3 Less than 3
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 2.12 images/sec 2.97 images/sec
Face detection 1.03 images/sec 1.48 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.08 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.11 Gpixels/sec 0.15 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.09 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 4.05 Gpixels/sec 5.57 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 242.1 FPS 320.9 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 150 -
Graphics test 1 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 367 -
Graphics test 2 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 8724 -
Video editing score 6058 -
Data manipulation score 7484 -
Photo editing score 26572 -
Writing score 10586 -
Phones tested Less than 3 -

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 77 FPS
[Low]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 42 FPS
[High]
-
Fortnite 26 FPS
[Low]
-
Shadowgun Legends 74 FPS
[Low]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 56 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Genshin Impact 37 FPS
[Low]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 59 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Device Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
1080 x 2400
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 810
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-22 -> FoausAnTuTu 11576268
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-02 (Nam)AnTuTu 11608161
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-05 -> Harsha9849AnTuTu 11579097
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-23 (Klim)AnTuTu 11569913
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-28 (Gab)AnTuTu 11560120
MediaTek Dimensity 800
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2024-09-27 (JawDaw5)Geekbench 6 CPU665 / 2221

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 810 and Dimensity 800

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2400 MHz 2000 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8-A
L1 cache 512 KB 512 KB
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L3 cache 2 MB 2 MB
Process 6 nanometers 7 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 6 W 8 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G57 MP2 Mali-G57 MP4
Architecture Valhall 1st gen Valhall 1st gen
GPU frequency 1068 MHz 748 MHz
Pipelines 2 4
Shading units 32 32
Total shaders 64 128
FLOPS 136.7 Gigaflops 191.5 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 3.0 MediaTek APU 3.0
NPU theoretical performance - 2.4 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17.07 Gb/s 17.07 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 2K at 30FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video playback 2K at 30FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 2770 Mbps Up to 2770 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1250 Mbps Up to 1250 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.1 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Info

Announced August 2021 December 2019
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number MT6833V MT6873
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 810 official site MediaTek Dimensity 800 official site
Successor - MediaTek Dimensity 6080 - MediaTek Dimensity 7050

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
133 (71.9%)
52 (28.1%)
Total votes: 185

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 800 and Dimensity 810, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Samuel28 April 1, 2026 at 11:16 PM
Dimensity 800 was somehow outperforms that 810 why mediatek hasnt use that as a rebrand instead of 810
0 Reply